Free speech is now our most important right. 2A is not going to stop totalitarian mind-control. They already search and seize whatever they want. So far, though, we still have a fundamental right to free speech even if we can be isolated by algorithms. We want and need more but at least we have what we have. Eva has a prominent voice and is using it well. I urge everyone to use your freedom of speech. Say what you think not just online but to your friends and family, your neighbors. Wide-open toleration of strong opinions is the bloodstream of a free society, a real civilization. ABN
Ursula is pushing leftist ‘soft’ totalitarianism, wrapped in smarmy ‘morality’. What she wants is to control European minds by controlling what they can say and hear. At this juncture, as AI advances rapidly and security controls become increasingly omnipotent, we must insist on free speech, unrestricted free speech. Restricting speech based on bogus claims of ‘misinformation’ or ‘hate speech’ or whatever Ursula doesn’t like, serves only the totalitarians. With free speech on as many platforms as possible, the citizens of the West will constitute the only repository of information that can compete with AI. ABN
As Palantir continues to expand its reach, concerns about its role in facilitating targeted killings and oppressive surveillance grow. The company’s collaborations with military agencies, especially in Israel, have raised alarms about its technology being used for extrajudicial actions that contradict international humanitarian laws. Observers fear that Palantir’s capabilities could enable governments to monitor, control, and eliminate opposition movements, both domestically and internationally. The author argues that the ongoing partnership between Palantir and powerful governmental entities signifies a shift towards a more authoritarian model of governance, where technology serves not just to enhance security but to maintain the status quo and suppress dissent. The discussion surrounding Palantir encapsulates broader fears about the intersection of technology, surveillance, and power in modern society, making it a focal point for debates on civil liberties and the future of democracy.
Spying on everyone and killing anyone you deem to be a threat for whatever reason you like is the ultimate Kill-Or-Be-Killed (KOBK) move. This is where we are headed.
KOBK game theory is primarily a military game theory. It covers the psychology, morality, aims, and methods of players who are involved in any sort of power struggle. Its main premise is that players in KOBK conflicts, by definition, do not know for certain how powerful they are vis-a-vis their adversaries or how powerful their adversaries are. Moreover they do not know for certain the aims, motivations, and/or methods of their adversaries.
These conditions force all adversaries to kill-or-be-killed. They must kill their adversary or be killed by them. Kill does not necessarily mean death. It just means to render their adversary provably powerless. Joe Biden was ousted as a presidential candidate against his will. In the KOBK sense, he was ‘killed’.
The more paranoid and crazy the KOBK players are, the more dangerous they are to themselves and others. The linked article above claims: ‘Alex Karp, Thiel’s partner, is first and foremost, an anti-White Zionist and Leftist whose contempt for humanity and dissent knows no bounds’. If true, Karp’s aggressive stance will stimulate rival KOBK players to equal levels of fanaticism. Jewish Supremacism, which Karp appears to be embody and support is especially dangerous for its cultish practice of actual violence against all enemies, both real and imagined. ABN
This flap all but certainly proves there is real division between elite factions in USA. Trump and the activist judges, including Roberts, are not on the same side. What the judges are doing looks amateur. They lack not only a professional sense of public imaging but also good reason to do what they are doing. One can only assume they are desperate to prevent exposure of something even worse than massive corruption throughout the government. They appear to be battling for their elite faction’s hold on power. These rabbit holes are deep and ugly. Almost all of Congress is rolling in ill-gotten gains from (CIA-controlled) USAID NGOs. Now, even SCOTUS has no moral compass. ABN
A state Supreme Court has given the green light for children to be force-vaccinated without their parents’ knowledge or consent.
On Tuesday, Maine’s Supreme Court dismissed a medical malpractice lawsuit filed by a father whose 5-year-old daughter had been injected with a Covid mRNA “vaccine” against his wishes.
The father, Jeremiah Hogan, filed the lawsuit against Lincoln Medical Partners and its parent company, MaineHealth, Inc.
The case Hogan v. Lincoln Medical Partners raised significant legal questions about the scope of immunity under the federal Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act.
The high court’s March 4 ruling also raises concerns as it sets a precedent for institutions to begin vaccinating children against their parents’ wishes.
Besides the obvious, DEI has also been widely used to create mini-fiefdoms, where the family and friends of socialist autocrats get all the jobs, all the NGO grants, and ruin whatever they touch. It happens at local, state, and federal levels in all major institutions. ABN
I definitely see the bad but some good may come of this. NSA has the data on the parasite which has infested our country. Used properly, they can target all of it simultaneously and remove it. This could happen with a big splash or be done quietly with almost no one noticing. Either way, the result would be a much cleaner and more efficient nation with much less violence. Time will tell. ABN
Therefore, totalitarianism is inevitable. Advances in technology are now and will continue to be used by KOBK players against each other and against any and all potential rivals, including the masses.
That’s all there is to it. Nothing can stop it.
The only options are better or worse totalitarianism. I can imagine a fairly decent state with very low crime and a thriving population. I can also imagine something really bad.
A really bad state would lobotomize any potential enemy within, even for minor disruption. Lobotomies are already being used to control populations in many parts of the world, including USA. There will be even more of it. There will be less need to cut off your digital dollars or monitor your face because it’s much easier to simply lobotomize you without your permission or knowledge.
Who will be in ultimate control? Whichever group is strongest, most cohesive, most ruthless. How will we know them? Secrecy is to their advantage, so it’s highly probable we will never know who they are.
Who was in control of the Biden administration? Who controls US IC, Five Eyes? How much power do Jews really have? How much power do European royal families really have? How much power does Putin or Xi have?
Empires are inevitable due to the basic reality of KOBK game theory — that players in KOBK conflicts do not know for certain how powerful they are vis-a-vis their adversaries or how powerful their adversaries are. Moreover they do not know for certain the aims, motivations, and/or methods of their adversaries.
This is why hierarchies always grow and always strive to become more powerful. There is not going to be a multipolar world in any other sense than more than one empire competing with the other(s). Within each empire, totalitarianism. Total control. ABN
I largely agree with this but what’s even more important for ‘them’ is to thoroughly weaken and debase the population in preparation for full totalitarian takeover. If it were just about the money, why were they flooding the country with illegals? Why the rash spending spree under Biden? Why all the money to Ukraine on a senseless war? Why the wasteful green energy and DEI boondoggle? In every policy we see the same or similar motive to poison the population, ruin education, poison the wells of truth and prosperity. This indicates wholesale war on USA through infiltration and takeover. Just one example is Mayorkas who acted like a hostile general working against USA by encouraging a flood of illegals while at the same time denying he was doing it. There are deeper and much worse motives than just balancing the books at play here. ABN
To date, I, personally, have not seen anything particularly wise or interesting coming from Dugin. But since Ricardo posted this video, it is worth thinking about. A world of well-defined empires would resemble the 19th Century to some extent. I imagine each empire would have to be more responsive to its citizenry, while inter-empire politics would rely on 20th Century ‘Mutually Assured Destruction’ (MAD). MAD is a semi-stable world order, a semi-stasis of KOBK global game theory. This state of affairs, assuming non-violent or low violence to get there, would probably be better than any form of one-world government, which would always be susceptible to overweening conformity, mind-control, totalitarian abuse of individuals. I fear the left much more than the right, based on historical precedents. I have not yet watched the Dugin video above but plan to. It may change my views on him or what I say here. Notice, I am not shilling for empire, I am simply saying what is obvious — that KOBK game theory is real with potentially horrific outcomes. Any decent stasis is better than mutual destruction of the whole world. ABN
There is nothing reconcilable about American Liberty when contrast with a looming surveillance state. There is no facet of American values, the essential core of what we define as Americanism, that can exist without true liberty.
While the Declaration of Independence is long regarded as the greatest written declaration of purpose, the latter created Bill of Rights, the first Ten original amendments to the U.S. Constitution, is just as important. The first declared our intent; the second defined how our founders intended to retain the intent during our collective assembly. Together they outline what set the course to make America great.
We have allowed the foundational intent of both sets of documents to be compromised, because, well, simply we were lazy and complacent. Now we are engaged in a time of great consequence that will determine whether or not the purpose of our assembly can continue.
We are, in factual reality, now deep inside a debate carried out in the world of politics. The stakes have never been higher.
In nine days, President Donald J Trump is scheduled to be sworn in as President of the United States. In my non-pretending world, this is likely to be the last time in our lifetime to drag the conversation of how we define liberty into the American psyche. All of my research in the past two decades indicates this likelihood is not hyperbole. We have one shot at this, and our time is now.
Liberty, the fundamental decision to retain it or lose it, is the context for all other contexts that have preceded it. The principles of liberty that we have defined for generations cannot exist in an American surveillance state. Thus, the secretive courts, the unlawful usurpation of the 4th Amendment, the short-sighted ramifications of the Patriot Act, the weaponization of our federal law enforcement and police agencies, all of it, must be reviewed through this fundamental core issue, Liberty.
I have traveled throughout the East and West to gain perspective on what makes us different, and what I can assert with clarity is that if we lose the Liberty argument, then the ideological representatives behind Barack Obama will have succeeded, the fundamental transformation will be irreversible.
This frames the cornerstone of my viewpoints on all of the characters in politics. It is not a matter of debate that on these core issues of Liberty and the stopping of the Surveillance State, everything else is a downstream consequence. The tiered system of constitutional protections for particular categories of personage must be rebuked. On this matter there cannot be compromise, because every outcome that impedes our way of life is a derivative of this value.
I will oppose all interests who refuse to confront the Surveillance State. I will draw bold attention to those who are willingly creating it, and I promise you I will call out every operational interest that is willfully blind to its creation.
…After spending years asking every representative of consequence why they support the FISA-702 process, I can tell you every one of them says they believe it is needed because the IC tells them there are just too many domestic terror threats that need to be monitored.
It is impossible to find a person in DC who will forcefully try to stop FISA-702 reauthorization.
If you ask me why in hindsight, I now take the position that FISA-702 is the gateway to the massive surveillance system currently being put into place using Real ID and the AI facial recognition software provided by Palantir (CIA exploit). In essence, the gateway that allows the full-scale surveillance state, is opened by the prior authorization of FISA-702 that negates any 4th amendment protection.
Why? Because all of the surveillance mechanisms within the network being updated and enhanced by AI search and capture, comes from the IC being allowed to exploit the NSA database. That same database access allowance is the targeting mechanism for FISA-702. If warrantless searches of the NSA database were stopped, the Palantir/IC and Tech Bro collaboration could hit a brick wall.
Against this backdrop, the SSCI telling Tulsi Gabbard that her nomination approval is contingent upon her support for FISA-702, simply makes sense.
This is also a big part of the reason why the DC Deep State will easily confirm Kash Patel to be Donald Trump’s FBI Director. Kash Patel is a big believer in the value of FISA-702.
My position on this topic is we the plebs should talk about it and investigate it openly and honestly for as long as it is illegal to discuss in Europe and until we are satisfied we have a decent take on what really happened. This is one of several major topics that merely discussing defies totalitarian mind-control. JFK is another one. 9/11 and Epstein’s client list are two more. The real reasons WW1 and WW2 started is another one. It behooves us to keep talking about these topics because we want to live in a world that pursues truth and cares about it. A world with honest values and an honest valuation of history and current events. ABN
American Buddhist Net 
