The Genetic Arms Race | How CRISPR and AI Destroy the World

This vid is a bit silly but it may be worth watching because vastly improved IVF technology is inevitable. And so are other forms of gene manipulation. Today, there are already many reports of women in China and India using Northern European gametes for IVF pregnancies. Given a choice, people will choose the best genes available for their offspring. The dawning age of ‘digital babies’, which will allow extensive gene selection, will profoundly change our sense of what our lineage, tribe, nation, heritage even is. I believe we can be hopeful about what is coming since new technologies will surely raise the IQs of people across the world. Higher intelligence generally leads to better ethical behavior. The main downside I see is higher intelligence can also result in more intelligent criminals, or worse, groups of more intelligent criminals, or politicians. ABN

UPDATE: Here’s another take on this topic. I do not see the harm in spreading good genes worldwide nor is it possible to stop this technology from spreading and improving. Given the choice, parents will opt for the best for their children. ABN

Future Science – The Wave Genome – Quantum Holography of DNA with Ulrike Granögger

UPDATE: This video is thought provoking and surely valid in many ways.

I am going to align two core ideas presented in the video and briefly explain how they relate to FIML practice:

DNA can be spoken to

and

while the chemical structure of DNA molecules will be almost the same in virtually all organisms, the electromagnetic informational signals or holographic images that travel upon these molecules can be vastly different

a language/semiotic signal occurs in a context. when we correct a language/semiotic signal through FIML we prevent an error from changing the context, which it is liable to do.

by doing this many times, we strengthen a healthy (mutual & individual) mind context; strengthen its coherence and efficiency while also strengthening the method for doing this

in a wider sense, “correcting” for good ends could also be “manipulating” for bad ends.* in a narrow context between two people playing the FIML game, manipulative correcting for bad ends could happen but would be difficult to maintain over a wide/large interpersonal context though this is possible. an evil FIML partner is possible. it is also possible for both partners to be evil

that said it is easier to be good and more satisfying to be good, so more FIML partners will tend toward the good than the bad. good FIML partners will strengthen their shared holographic context and expand it in good ways

*scams, propaganda, cheating, etc

DO NOT MISS THIS TALK: Geert Vanden Bossche with Bret Weinstein on covid vaccines

BE SURE TO WATCH THIS. Bret does an excellent job of making Geert’s ideas clear as a bell. Use CC (closed captions) to help with Geert’s accent. This is very important material we all should know.

UPDATE: In two places Bret indicates a very strict lockdown in USA for a couple weeks would have stopped coivd early on. This is wrong because: 1) lockdowns never work; and 2) even if you could perfectly lockdown USA and it did work here, the rest of the world would still have covid and we would be reinfected. Geert seems to have gently corrected this mistake by mentioning that variants in India and Brazil also affect us. I may have misunderstood Bret and for this reason said nothing when I posted this video. Since posting, others have independently brought up the problem, so I am adding this update. ABN