Do your best. Speak the truth.
At this time, not verified beyond some X posts, but X is probably more reliable than MSM. This appears to be conspicuous escalation which will lead to more of the same, and ultimately WW3 if no one pulls back. By all signs, WW3 seems to be the next goal for the Western cabal. ABN
Russia should not be our enemy, Ukraine’s enemy or Europe’s enemy. USA/NATO forced Russia’s hand and is right now escalating toward WW3 for no reason that is good for any Western country, including Russia, which is properly an integral and extremely valuable part of Europe. Whatever your feelings, Danilov’s act of heroism is worthy of respect. ABN
He is right and also his statements prove: 1) the core of globalist thinking is anti-Western and thus this core is not itself Western; smarmy Western toadies, opportunists, traitors and hangers-on are numerous and being used at all levels but they are not at the core; 2) the core globalists are not just anti-Western, they are anti-everyone in the world who is not them and thus they will not stop until they have achieved global domination, the essence of the word globalist. In this light, all peoples in the world who are not part of the core anti-Western/ anti-everyone who is not them globalists should fear and oppose core globalists. All peoples in the world who are not them are grossly mistaken to frame the world’s plight in anti-Western or anti-White or anti-Christian terms because after Russia falls and the West is entirely cucked, destroyed and conquered, they will be next. ABN
This is the inevitable escalation Western cabal has been working towards. Possible consequences are numerous — full-scale nuclear war; less drastically, prolonged war between Europe and Russia; thus keeping Russia occupied while Israel-USA do full-scale conventional war in Middle East; elections in USA cancelled or postponed; economic chaos throughout the world as chaos always benefits the strongest, which is how Western cabal (probably rightly for now) sees itself. It must also be considered that the West has a super-weapon which global chaos will both facilitate and conceal the use of. This is possibly that super-weapon, outlandish as that may seem. It could also be something else. ABN
A few agitated commenters have once again begun denouncing Prof. Jeffrey Sachs for allegedly being responsible for the Western looting of Russia during the 1990s.
Frankly, a decade or two ago I’d vaguely had the same opinion since I’d always seen him described in the newspapers as one of the key economic advisors to the Russian government of that period and had read some article somewhere making that claim. But I’d never explored this matter and over the last couple of years I’ve become convinced that my impression was entirely mistaken.
Therefore, I’d urge that people read Sachs’ article providing his version of the history, very similar to what he’d said in his 2005 book, which I’d read earlier this year. I’d also strongly suggest that people watch his detailed interview, which he apparently arranged after Taibbi and the other hosts had casually made that same mistaken accusation in a previous show.
Over the last couple of years I’ve watched a number of his interviews in which he discussed these matters, and all I can say is that he’s either being honest or he’s about the best liar in the history of the human species.
As far as I can tell, the only reason people believe Sachs was responsible was one 1998 article published in the Nation plus portions of Naomi Klein’s 2007 book. Mistaken ideas sometimes get into circulation and are then repeated back and forth so many times that everyone assumes they’re correct. But I’ve carefully read those two sources and I found Sachs’ account much more persuasive.
More importantly, President Putin and the top Russian leaders have denounced the 1990s policies as one of the greatest economic disasters of the 20th century and have been scathing in their denunciations of the American advisors who they blamed for the looting of their country and the total impoverishment of the Russian population. However, they’ve never included Sachs in that category, and instead they have always treated him with respect and friendship.
I think that Putin and his leadership team have a much better idea of what really happened during the 1990s than any of us do, and the identities of the heroes and the villains. So I trust Putin’s judgment on such things.
This issue has major importance because of Sachs’ current status as one of the foremost critics of American policies. Indeed, in my articles I’ve made that point that Sachs has probably now become the highest-ranking American ideological defector of the last one hundred years, or at least no other obvious names come to mind:
I have been extremely suspicious of Sachs and avoided posting any of his material on this site. I am willing to consider Ron’s argument but also can’t not notice, once again, it’s one Jew defending another. ‘The best way to control the opposition is to lead them’. If you click on the link to Ron’s comments and read some other comments, you will get a fuller picture of this issue. I, for one, remember the rape of Russia and that Sachs was a prominent exponent of economic ‘shock therapy’ not only in Russia but also South America, if memory serves. I may be wrong and am willing to change my view of Sachs but am not eager to do so. Below is a recent video of Sachs commenting on Ukraine. In that video, he blames everything on ‘USA’ when the reality appears to be different and rife with his tribe always at or near the top. So, I dunno. Best to be suspicious, yet at the same time ready to forgive anyone who honestly repents and changes their ways. Of course, Sachs is claiming he never was doing bad things in Russia and Ron’s use of Putin’s non-criticism of Sachs is illuminating, but there are surely many dark wrinkles inside of that. A non-confession, non-repentance, I-was-always-right-and-good argument might be true, but consider the sources. ABN
US officials and lawmakers shot back after Vladimir Putin said that Nato’s potential lifting of restrictions on Ukraine to launch long-range strikes over the border into Russian territory would mean Nato countries were “at war” with Russia.
The prime minister, Keir Starmer, met with the US president, Joe Biden, on Friday at the White House, where the two were expected to discuss – though not necessarily announce – a loosening of restrictions on Storm Shadow missiles that would allow Ukraine to strike targets as far as 155 miles inside Russia.
“This will mean that Nato countries – the United States and European countries – are at war with Russia,” Putin told Russian reporters on Thursday. “And if this is the case, then, bearing in mind the change in the essence of the conflict, we will make appropriate decisions in response to the threats that will be posed to us.”
The missiles are jointly produced in the UK and France, and both countries appear to be seeking Biden’s go-ahead to loosen restrictions on the use of the long-range missiles. Western officials have indicated that the US is not planning to allow its own missiles to be used to strike targets deeper inside Russia.
Like all things political, there are many shells in this game. Escalation of the KOBK ultimate goal of world domination is one shell, while another is interference with the US 2024 elections. In real-world game theory, chaos benefits the strongest player and will be pursued by the player that believes they are the strongest. Hence, endless wars in the Middle east, escalating chaos and war in Europe. Escalating chaotic immigration in Western countries proves the top KOBK rulers of the West are not themselves Westerners. ABN
Russia and Europe are next. These are the results of an ongoing KOBK battle at the top of the world power structure. It has ever been escalating and will continue escalating. There are more fronts than kinetic war. As people are displaced in the Middle East, they are transported into Europe where whites are displaced. NATO is now planning bombing from Ukraine deep inside Russia. Putin says that means war with Europe. Chaos, escalation, it won’t stop. Ukraine is already destroyed. Over one-half of the population has already fled, never to return. WW3 is already happening. The savagery is wherever you look. ABN
Latvia should make conscription mandatory for women, the Baltic country’s defense minister said Tuesday.
“Moving toward comprehensive national defense, I support the mandatory conscription of women into the national defense service. 2028 could be the optimal time to start it,” Andris Sprūds posted on X, reiterating his comments in an interview with local media earlier Tuesday.
Latvia, which shares a border with Russia, reintroduced conscription only last year, after abolishing it in 2006. The country, which has a population of less than 2 million, selects conscripts at random and aims to have 4,000 soldiers by 2028.
The Baltic nation was one of the last countries near Russia to bring back conscription, as Sweden and Lithuania decided to do so shortly after Moscow illegally annexed Ukraine’s Crimea in 2014.
The Baltics should have declared neutrality after achieving independence and worked to be a bridge between Europe and Russia. Foreign policies based on hatred and fear from their Soviet pasts have been a mistake for all three Baltic mini-states. Money from the EU has been cool but teach a man a skill and he will be happier his whole life than accepting handouts. As a bridge, the Baltics would have benefitted economically but more importantly, they would have benefitted intellectually and spiritually. The bold move of putting their Soviet years behind them and creating the future they wanted to live in would have stimulated them to abandon the habit of being someone else’s bitch. Latvia wants to raise a military of 4,000, surely yet another one of the hidden costs of those ‘free’ EU handouts. It’s not too late to change course. I hope at least one of the Baltics or even Finland will break with the war-mongers and train 4,000 diplomats, economists, and statesmen instead of soldiers. Ukraine has lost 500,000 of its military, dead, for zero benefit except to the oligarchs who now own all of their destroyed nation. ABN
Sounds reasonable from his angle, but Mearsheimer either pretends he doesn’t know or really doesn’t know that destroying Ukraine was always the plan. Destroying Russia along with or after destroying Ukraine is also the plan. Destroying Europe is also the plan. The people doing this are not irrational. They are aiming for global domination. You have to think like them to understand what they are doing and why. All policies they control are designed to weaken and destroy the entire West so that they can control all of it. It’s a perfectly reasonable strategy and it has worked extremely well for them. Included in this strategy has been multigenerational clandestine infiltration of all Western institutions accompanied by disabling promising young Westerners (especially boys and young men) so there can be no one left to fight back. Notice how virtually all Ukrainian men of military age have been slaughtered, many of them forced to the front, many of them underage teenagers. Zelensky is not Ukrainian but rather a member of the cabal that has destroyed Ukraine. They are happy to kill as many Ukrainians as they can, already 700,000 and counting. Europe and Russia are next. I like Mearsheimer, but like so many other alternate voices to mainstream cabal, he assumes they think like him, or pretends they do. Maybe he believes pure reason (based on his classical assumptions about right and wrong) will convince an incorrigible adversary to change its ways. Mearsheimer is a ‘realist’ who analyzes ‘great powers’ based on their perceived needs. Why has he not realized that the ‘great power’ controlling the West is hidden, secreted behind veils of misdirection? They are behaving exactly as his political philosophy dictates, but based on different assumptions and different goals. ABN
Dear Americans, please pay attention to what’s happening in Europe right now. The globalist takeover is happening at an incredibly fast pace over here.
France just arrested Pavel Durov, founder & CEO of Telegram.
The UK is locking up its own citizens for years and years for the ‘crime’ of standing up against mass migration and writing posts about it online.
In the meantime Europeans keep getting randomly stabbed by immigrants on a daily basis and since the legacy media does nothing but protect the establishment and hide the truth from us, their next main goal is to ban @X
. The only platform where we can find and speak the truth.
It’s so clear what they’re doing and frankly it’s not looking good for us – especially because we don’t have a Second Amendment that could protect us against tyranny.
So please, vote wisely in November. For your sake and ours: Vote for
Readers of this site have seen this coming for years. There are several obvious fronts that may soon climax in violence and ruthless totalitarian takeover: Regional war in the ME possibly escalating to WW3; war in Ukraine spreading into Russia and leading to wider war in Europe and WW3; assassination of Trump; another stolen election; crackdown on speech à la Europe; asymmetric war in USA incited by illegal immigrant military operatives; economic crash; digital internet crash; another plandemic, a mixture of any or all of the above. Beyond these, there are many other plans to seize totalitarian control. We are on the edge of an extremely dangerous precipice. Yes, human history has ever been thus. Except this time the powers of the totalitarians are many orders of magnitude greater than ever before.
We are right now living through the culmination of a KOBK battle at the top of the global power structure. Some readers have wondered why I have written about KOBK. The reason is KOBK describes the ‘game theory’ and ‘morality’ forced on people at the summits of political power. Those people have no choice but to seize all the power they can get. If they back away, someone else will do it. If they are not strong enough, they will be killed and they know it. KOBK is the ultimate zero sum game. There will be only one winner and their win will always be only temporary no matter how ruthless they are. The world has ever been thus but the power and means to attain power have never been as extreme as today. The odds of the world descending into an abyss of savage totalitarianism have never been greater. ABN
The Department of State has information that Russia is stepping up efforts to launch strikes against Ukraine’s civilian infrastructure and government facilities in the coming days. Russian strikes in Ukraine pose a continued threat to civilians and civilian infrastructure. The U.S. Embassy urges U.S. citizens to depart Ukraine now using privately available ground transportation options if it is safe to do so.
Three days ago, in the aftermath of the WSJ report seeking to radically shift the narrative over the Nordstream sabotage, where instead of the CIA being blamed for the explosion of the critical gas pipeline from Russia to Europe, unnamed “intelligence” sources forged on with a hilarious script according to which a top Ukraine general (operating initially under the instructions of Zelensky but then going rogue wen Z got “cold feet”) was responsible for coordinating the sabotage using a handful of rank amateurs who somehow managed to sneak to the bottom of the Baltic sea and conduct an unprecedented military operation, we said that – no matter the laughable veracity of the report – relations between Germany and Ukraine are “about to turn ugly”, and we asked why this story is coming out just now?
We didn’t have long to wait to get the answer: as German media reports, this U-turn in the narrative (which according to some meant that NATO should now unleash its full military power against…. Ukraine, which had single-handedly attacked German assets by blowing up the Nordstream) was meant to soften the blow from Germany’s decision to finally cut off Ukraine’s – and Zelensky’s – unprecedented grift.
According to a Saturday report in the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (FAZ), the German government will stop new military aid to Ukraine as part of the ruling coalition’s plan to reduce spending. The report, which cited non-public documents and emails as well as discussions with unnamed sources, goes on to note that the moratorium on new assistance – which is already in effect – will affect new requests for funding, not previously approved aid.
American Buddhist Net 