AAPS Letter to AMA Re: Ivermectin and COVID

AMA does not specify any recommended early treatments, but simply urges face masks, distancing, and vaccination.

Our members would appreciate clarification of the AMA’s stand on the following questions:

1) What are the criteria for advocating that pharmacists override the judgment of fully qualified physicians who are responsible for individual patients?

2) What are the criteria for forbidding off-label use of long-approved drugs, which constitute at least 20 percent of all prescriptions?

3) On what basis does AMA demand use only within a clinical trial for ivermectin, but call for virtually universal vaccination outside of controlled trials, despite FDA warnings of potential cardiac damage in healthy young patients, and no information about long-term effects?


Preventing early treatment with safe drugs known to work against covid is a crime against humanity. It’s not even a soft crime of a bunch of dumb bureaucrats never knowing what to do. This is a conscious well-considered directive from the AMA. I do not see any difference between this and an order to kill. ABN

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s