Consulting firms linked to the White House’s leading Ukraine policy architects – including Secretary of State Antony Blinken and Deputy Secretary of State Victoria Nuland – appear to be advising the Ukrainian government on its reconstruction efforts funded by U.S. taxpayers.
The unearthed connections come amidst over $110 billion being sent to the notoriously corrupt country, with staunch opposition to curtailing the flow of cash or even auditing where the funds are actually being spent. Strategy papers obtained from these White House-linked consulting firms appear to call for a “multi-decade” continuation of foreign aid to Ukraine, even admitting the war provided a “window of opportunity” to achieve changes that would have been “politically difficult to achieve.”
Nuland, currently a top State Department official believed to be behind U.S. efforts to orchestrate Ukraine’s 2014 Maidan Revolution, was a former Senior Counselor at the Albright Stonebridge Group, a global business strategy firm based in Washington, D.C. In addition to Nuland, Albright Stonebridge Group counts several high-ranking White House officials linked to Ukraine policy as its alumni: United Nations Ambassador Linda Thomas-Greenfield, Deputy Secretary of State for Management and Resources Richard Verma, Nominee for Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs James O’Brien.
Despite the robust conflict of interest, Albright Stonebridge appears to be involved in advising on the issue of Ukraine reconstruction. The firm published a white paper -“Land Value Capture Can Finance Ukraine’s Reconstruction, Reduce Corruption, And Boost Productivity” – outlining a variety of economic strategies for rebuilding Ukraine with foreign aid packages, predominantly underwritten by U.S. taxpayers.
The rot is displayed front and center in this article.
It is obvious the Ukraine War was provoked by US neocons who control NATO in order to: 1) destabilize Russia and 2) destroy Ukraine and denude it of population and military males so that Ukraine can be rebuilt by US neocons in their image and for their gain. This is the real meaning of ‘Build Back Better.’
Strategists willing and able to pursue goals as destructive and selfish as these cannot be expected to back down because they lost the war. In their minds, they have succeeded in one-half of their mission—destroying Ukraine—and will not flinch from escalating the war to control the 2024 US election probably through new emergency war powers.
Many signs show the neocons also want to destabilize and destroy Europe and for the same reasons—Build Back Better in their own image. My sense is that Poland and the Baltics are being bribed and pushed into entering the war, thus making it a full-on NATO responsibility. The timing of this will be linked to the US elections. The covid psyop, which controlled the elections of 2020, began in early 2020 so it is reasonable to expect similar timing in 2024. This time it will be a war psyop probably starting around the end of this year. ABN
UPDATE: If the war goes nuclear and then global, destroying Russia, China, Europe and USA, I do not believe the neocons in control of these policies will be bothered in the least. They know that when the dust settles they will be in control of all of it—the entire world, which will have a greatly reduced and compliant population, allowing them complete freedom to Build Back in any way they choose. ABN