The European Union appears undeterred by years of calamitous climate policies, with EU Commission Chief Ursula von der Leyen demanding new taxes and other schemes to take green agenda investment into the “trillions”.
Leaders from around the world descended (many of whom on private jets) upon the oil-rich Arabian nation of Dubai for the 28th instalment of the United Nation’s top annual climate summit, in which politicians demand that ordinary citizens bankroll their lofty visions of a so-called green future.
Despite people suffering across Europe under an energy crisis as a result of the war in Ukraine and the years of dumping money into dubious ‘renewable’ energy sources, EU Chief Ursula von der Leyen’s takeaway was to double down on the very same policies that precipitated Europe’s precarious energy situation.
“More is needed,” the German politician urged, proclaiming: “We have to move from billions to trillions.”
The EU leader admitted that to accomplish such a goal, Brussels will need to “find new sources of revenue”. To do so, von der Leyen said that she “fully supports” the plan proposed by Kenyan President William Ruto and French President Emmanuel Macron to impose a global green tax targeting financial transactions to “raise more money for climate action.”
My partner often reminds me that our world is filled with very good science—the sciences of mind-control, mass hypnosis, fraud, corruption, censorship, propaganda, infiltration, mass murder, unrestricted war. ABN
Mass immigration is very obviously intended to destroy Western nations so they can be more easily controlled by globalists. There is no doubt the West is controlled by a cabal and one could argue philosophically that this might even be a good thing since democracy is a failed joke (witness mass immigration, etc). BUT none of what cabal has done is good. Nothing they do causes our nations to thrive. All of what they do is power-aggrandizement for themselves coupled with suppression of all other voices and ideas. The West is right now facing its greatest disaster in history. ABN
BRUSSELS — As the investigation into damage to Baltic Sea critical infrastructure continues, Finland’s Minister of European Affairs Anders Adlercreutz said it’s hard to believe sabotage to the undersea gas pipeline was accidental — or that it happened without Beijing’s knowledge.
“I’m not the sea captain. But I would think that you would notice that you’re dragging an anchor behind you for hundreds of kilometers,” Adlercreutz said in an interview Thursday in Brussels. “I think everything indicates that it was intentional. But of course, so far, nobody has admitted to it.”
Finland and Estonia have been investigating the rupture of the Balticconnector, a 77-kilometer-long gas pipeline that connects the two NATO members beneath the Baltic Sea. The pipeline was damaged around October 7-8, along with two telecoms cables connecting Estonia to Finland and Sweden.
At dinner last night, I was questioned about Twitter and the recent remarks of Elon Musk. My opinion is somewhat out of variance with the mainstream considerations.
I believe the demise of Twitter was essentially determined long ago. Musk stepped into a scenario that was tenuous at best, and the government control of the platform was always the fulcrum issue. Musk’s prior intent with the platform may be up for debate; however, against his recent remarks, I would argue Musk is presenting the potential collapse of the platform as a martyr scenario.
Musk said recently the platform may collapse without advertisers, but he will not acquiesce to corporate blackmail. Sounds great, but keep in mind that Musk has known about the fulfillment of the DOJ search warrant for user data since January of this year; we only recently discovered it. Put that background reality into the overlay of your opinion, given the year of comments about users shared by Musk, and the known lack of platform privacy.
Musk knew as an outcome of the platform fulfillment of the court order, the release of all user metadata who supported, followed, liked, or shared the tweets of Donald Trump, that the government created the “his kind” list earlier this year. Yet, he never discussed the issue of compromised privacy throughout his commentary; he did exactly the opposite while assuring people the platform would protect users. [Ex. How did the encrypted DM promise work out?]
Now Musk positions himself as the martyr, the victim of leftist targeting…. and his hired CEO Linda Yaccarino is doing the same thing [SEE HERE]. What better way to guide the platform into a controlled collapse than to be a martyred hero as the Twitter platform potentially disappears. Just think about it.
Over his career, Daniel Sheehan has participated in numerous legal cases of public interest, including the Pentagon Papers case, the Watergate Break-In case, the Silkwood case, the Greensboro massacre case, the La Penca bombing case and others. He established the Christic Institute and the Romero Institute, two non-profit public policy centers. Since 2015 Sheehan has lectured on American history, politics and the assassination of John F. Kennedy at the University of California, Santa Cruz.[2] Sheehan is currently Chief Counsel of the Romero Institute, where his focus is the Lakota People’s Law Project. Sheehan and The Lakota People’s Law Project participated in legal cases related to the Dakota Access Pipeline protests. In 2013 Sheehan published Daniel Sheehan: The People’s Advocate, a memoir, through Counterpoint Publishing.
UPDATE: This is a very important interview. I have watched about one-half of it and am pretty sure, given Kill-Or-Be-Killed rules, there is no chance significant information will be released to the public.
KOBK itself is not precisely a morality but it does force moral decisions on top people. They have no choice but to play by KOBK rules. Their only way out of KOBK is defeat. KOBK is winner-take-all, loser-loses-all.
Any technology that can yield a super-weapon will be pursued and will not be given up or shared with ‘the world’ which obviously includes KOBK adversaries.
Right now there are three main contenders for world domination. We do not know precisely who they are but can roughly locate them geographically. They are: 1) the powers that control the West; 2) the powers that control China; and 3) the powers that control Russia.
KOBK rules force Russia and China to cooperate, for now. They also force Western power(s) to pursue world-domination against any alliance that may threaten it. This of course means China and Russia today.
It may feel weird to think from the point of view of a top KOBK player, but try it. If you are at the top of Western power, would you give up a super-weapon or the chance of creating a super-weapon, with or without alien technology?
To do so would cause your defeat in the KOBK arena by gifting to your adversaries—who are as ruthless as you—the best means you have to win the battle for global domination.
Another take on this is the alien stuff is a bluff. The super-weapon is a bluff to unsettle KOBK adversaries, keep them wondering, keep them in check. Before you weigh this possibility, factor in how recklessly and apparently ‘incompetently’ Westerns powers have been behaving. Incompetence can be a ruse as well as an excuse.
Did top KOBK players in the West seize control of the West through incompetence and recklessness? Or did they seize control of the West through strategic competence and well-calculated daring?
If we factor in their past behavior, we would do well to assume they are very savvy deep players who have beaten everyone to get to the top and who do not back down. This is why I do not believe we will see anything significant coming from this bill. ABN
American Buddhist Net 