The scenario described below looks plausible to me. Another possibility is the DNI Report on election fraud has shown Congress that Trump can prove not only the fraud but also that they knowingly certified it. ABN

POTUS has been ridiculed and labelled as a tyrant, a narcissist, a power hungry racist… you know the things. For him to step in with a military operation and arrest the criminals then all those brainwashed TDS liberals will start a civil war…or worse. Right? So how do you solve the problem.

a. You step aside. You give the appearance you are leaving and out of the way. You are no longer relevant. Having no twitter, Facebook, etc. is a moot issue because you have no power, no authority and nothing to say. Agree? Because he literally just did that with his last video. Granted he didn’t actually concede and he is still the President. You go silent. (10 days of darkness)

b. You replace your Attorney General and Director of National Intelligence. He just did that. Why? Why now? They are loyal. Why is this important? Consider what we know today.

Evidence is now in the open regarding how Italy rigged the election through the compromised voting machines. It appears it is unarguable and indisputable. The affidavit in hand is the guy who actually made the downloads. He knows exactly how many votes he flipped for whom and in which states. So, if not POTUS, who’s responsibility is it to take action? Foreign interference that didn’t just interfere with our election but actually dictated the outcome is again unarguably a HUGE National Security Threat.

Enter stage left… John Ratcliff (Director of National Intelligence) For Ratcliff to ignore this threat is an egregious act of incompetence. He can NOT responsibly ignore such a major threat to the United States of America. Here is a guy in a foreign country with a foreign entity testifying he changed the outcome of our U.S. election for the highest office in our land. Ratcliff must step in and take action. He really has no choice.

Ratcliff’s action would in-turn cause a huge legal problem for the Department of Justice. He would expose the unarguable fact the 2nd branch of government (Congress) just ratified electoral votes absolutely created and manufactured by a foreign influence. This breaks all kinds of laws not to mention the U.S. Constitution itself. For the Department of Justice to ignore this is an egregious dereliction of duty. Enter stage right… Jeffrey Rosen. Rosen MUST address this malfeasance and act.

The election problem is then solved efficiently, immediately and completely.

Result? Donald J. Trump is still our President!

Then what? Then in DJT 2nd term the Patrick Byrne data, the Lin Wood data, the Sidney Powell/Rudy data, and yes even the John Durham data can all be combined and do a thorough swamp sanitization! Boom!

I think this might be the plan.

-my two cents.

link to original

Joint Statement from Senators Cruz, Johnson, Lankford, Daines, Kennedy, Blackburn, Braun, Senators-Elect Lummis, Marshall, Hagerty, Tuberville

…“On January 6, it is incumbent on Congress to vote on whether to certify the 2020 election results. That vote is the lone constitutional power remaining to consider and force resolution of the multiple allegations of serious voter fraud.

“At that quadrennial joint session, there is long precedent of Democratic Members of Congress raising objections to presidential election results, as they did in 1969, 2001, 2005, and 2017. And, in both 1969 and 2005, a Democratic Senator joined with a Democratic House Member in forcing votes in both houses on whether to accept the presidential electors being challenged.

“The most direct precedent on this question arose in 1877, following serious allegations of fraud and illegal conduct in the Hayes-Tilden presidential race. Specifically, the elections in three states-Florida, Louisiana, and South Carolina-were alleged to have been conducted illegally.

“In 1877, Congress did not ignore those allegations, nor did the media simply dismiss those raising them as radicals trying to undermine democracy. Instead, Congress appointed an Electoral Commission-consisting of five Senators, five House Members, and five Supreme Court Justices-to consider and resolve the disputed returns.

“We should follow that precedent. To wit, Congress should immediately appoint an Electoral Commission, with full investigatory and fact-finding authority, to conduct an emergency 10-day audit of the election returns in the disputed states. Once completed, individual states would evaluate the Commission’s findings and could convene a special legislative session to certify a change in their vote, if needed.

“Accordingly, we intend to vote on January 6 to reject the electors from disputed states as not ‘regularly given’ and ‘lawfully certified’ (the statutory requisite), unless and until that emergency 10-day audit is completed.

I doubt there is a politician anywhere in the USA who does not know the election was massively and criminally fraudulent. Well more than fifty percent of the US population knows it was rigged.