Tag: crime
Georgia State Senate meeting on 2020 Election Fraud 12/30/20
This video is absolutely worth viewing. It’s long so jump around to get an idea of how the fraud happened. The testimony is riveting, detailed, and provided by highly credentialed experts. Given the importance of this election and the importance of fair elections to our political system, the testimony presented in this video is crucial to understanding what our country is facing today.
A Simple Test for the extent of Vote Fraud with Absentee Ballots in the 2020 Presidential Election: Georgia and Pennsylvania Data
Posted: 29 Dec 2020
US Department of Justice
This study provides measures of vote fraud in the 2020 presidential election. It first compares Fulton county’s precincts that are adjacent to similar precincts in neighboring counties that had no allegations of fraud to isolate the impact of Fulton county’s vote-counting process (including potential fraud). In measuring the difference in President Trump’s vote share of the absentee ballots for these adjacent precincts, we account for the difference in his vote share of the in-person voting and the difference in registered voters’ demographics. The best estimate shows an unusual 7.81% drop in Trump’s percentage of the absentee ballots for Fulton County alone of 11,350 votes, or over 80% of Biden’s vote lead in Georgia. The same approach is applied to Allegheny County in Pennsylvania for both absentee and provisional ballots. The estimated number of fraudulent votes from those two sources is about 55,270 votes.
link to original
Second, vote fraud can increase voter turnout rate. Increased fraud can take many forms: higher rates of filling out absentee ballots for people who hadn’t voted, dead people voting, ineligible people voting, or even payments to legally registered people for their votes. However, the increase might not be as large as the fraud if votes for opposing candidates are either lost, destroyed, or replaced with ballots filled out for the other candidate. The estimates here indicate that there were 70,000 to 79,000 “excess” votes in Georgia and Pennsylvania. Adding Arizona, Michigan, Nevada, and Wisconsin, the total increases to up to 289,000 excess votes.
Full paper available at above link.
Good discussion of 2020 election fraud and what Congress can do about it
Did you see this speech? President Trump explains election fraud
Georgia: Burden of proof is on officials not citizens
It is not the duty of citizens to prove election fraud happened. It is the duty of election officials and legislators to prove fraud could not have happened. By no stretch of the imagination can they do this in Georgia and elsewhere: thus election results are at best uncertifiable.
It is not necessary to prove election fraud but only to show that significant fraud could have happened. What we see in Georgia and other swing states is not only that fraud could have happened but that it obviously did happen. The odds of so many unprecedent anomalies and irregularities all being in favor of Biden are so small, it is obvious election fraud happened and that it was massive. Biden did not win. Trump did. No reasonable person who looks at the evidence can conclude otherwise.
Election results in Georgie and other swing states are clearly uncertifiable. It is the duty of state legislatures to ensure that their election have been run fairly and results have not been tampered with, that they are not fraudulent; that there has been no ballot stuffing, that ballot counting was honest and observed by both sides, that voting machines were not connected to the internet and that they could not possibly have been manipulated by anyone at any time. Georgia and other swing states cannot do this. It is a national disgrace that mainstream media, virtually all Democrats and far too many Republicans dare pretend otherwise.
Scott Adams: “Why can’t that victim accept his mugging? What is wrong with him?”
On the ODNI report delay
Readers who are aware of how important this time period is may feel disappointed—even conned—by the delay of the expected report from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, scheduled to be released on or before 12/18.
The following comment is a very good read. It explains why missing the deadline can be seen as a good thing. Be sure to read the whole comment, available at the link below:
…In this election we are “learning” the importance of law and dates and REQUIREMENTS (Shall, MUST, may, can, order, authorize). These words and dates may [sic] meaning and power.
There would be a very real National Security Interest to NOT PROVIDE congress with a serious real active and clear and present danger and threat to this country if said threat and the reporting of it substantively the JUDGEMENT AND EXCERCISE OF EXCLUSIVE EXECUTIVE POWER. (comment link)
Further reading: 2020 Election Fraud is CCP ‘Assassin’s Mace’: Patrick Byrne
Below is a screen shot of the ODNI announcement of delay:
Patrick Byrne: “On behalf of the FBI …I bribed Hillary Clinton”
Here is the full Byrne segment.
Byrne starts at 34:33. Video is prompted, just hit play,
Worldwide CCP infiltration revealed: “Details of nearly two million members”
…“Along with the personal identifying details of 1.95 million communist party members, mostly from Shanghai, there are also the details of 79,000 communist party branches, many of them inside companies”. (Major leak ‘exposes’ members and ‘lifts the lid’ on the Chinese Communist Party)
Sidney Powell describes multilayered criminal activity in election
There are three short videos to watch at this link. ABN
How Dominion Voting Machines work
Longer version:
MOTION OF DONALD J. TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, TO INTERVENE IN HIS PERSONAL CAPACITY AS CANDIDATE FOR RE-ELECTION, PROPOSED BILL OF COMPLAINT IN INTERVENTION, AND BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO INTERVENE
Well-worth reading. A sample below:
…In the 2020 election, under the guise of responding to the COVID-19 pandemic, election officials in several key states, sometimes on their own and sometimes in connection with court actions brought by partisan advocates, made a systematic effort to weaken measures to ensure fair and impartial elections by creating new rules for the conduct of the elections—rules that were never approved by the legislatures of the defendant states as required by Article II of the United States Constitution. These new rules were aimed at weakening, ignoring, or overriding provisions of state law that are aimed at ensuring the integrity of the voting process.
As more particularly alleged in the Bill of Complaint filed by the State of Texas, for the first time in history, these officials flooded their States with millions of ballots sent through the mail, or placed in drop boxes, with little or no chain of custody and, at the same time, intentionally weakened or eliminated the few existing security measures protecting the integrity of the vote—signature verification and witness requirements.
For example, Pennsylvania’s Secretary of State issued guidance purporting to suspend the signature verification requirements, in direct violation of state law. In Michigan, the Secretary of State illegally flooded the state with absentee ballot applications mailed to every registered voter despite the fact that state law strictly limits the ballot application process. In Wisconsin, the largest cities all deployed hundreds of unmanned, unsecured absentee ballot drop boxes that were all invalid means of returning absentee votes under state law. In Georgia, the Secretary of State instituted a series of unlawful policies, including processing ballots weeks before election day and destructively revising signature and identity verification procedures.
In all cases, absentee ballots were mailed to people without even a perfunctory attempt to verify the recipient’s identity or eligibility to vote, including residency, citizenship, and criminal records. When returned and counted, the ballots were typically separated from their security envelopes, divorcing them from any information that could have helped determine whether the votes were legally cast. (link to original)
The president’s martial law powers explained & why he may need to use them
I do not mind saying that the Nov 3 election is obviously rife with fraud; and that if relevant state legislatures do not either decertify or redo their elections; and/or if the Supreme Court does not rule in a way that significantly corrects fraudulent returns; I favor president Trump using his martial law powers to: 1) either redo the election under the auspices of the US military; or 2) redress the wrongs by other reasonable legal means. In my view, if this election stands as is, our republic is finished.
The video below provides a good explanation of how and why martial law is a reasonable course of action, all others failing.
Edit 10 AM: Texas Sues: Looks Like A Game Changer
American Buddhist Net 