An example of KOBK information hegemony

__________

Everyone knows the ‘force’ Carlson refers to is either CIA or Jewish Supremists or a combination of both. What they are hiding is Israel’s and CIA’s roles in the JFK killing and the Epstein espionage and blackmail racket. Carlson implies as much very strongly and gives a loud voice to those who already know. He seems to be doing his best to inform the public, to give them correct information. If Israel is perceived as playing a major if not the major role in the assassination of JFK, gigantic silos of bad information will implode across the world and especially in USA. Epstein videos, if released, would be even more graphic and explosive because they are closer in time and implicate many prominent people who are still alive. The big question today is how long can the powers that be continue hiding this information? The Bondi-Patel standstill alone is proof everyone is cowed, including Trump, or so it seems. Only a very powerful player can keep these lies going. But, the harder they come the harder they fall. ABN

Trump border czar Tom Homan threatens green card holders amid massive immigration crackdown

Donald Trump’s border czar Tom Homan said that Mahmoud Khalil could be the first of many green cards holders to be deported amid his widespread crackdown on legal and illegal immigrants. 

President Trump boasted about the arrest of Khalil earlier Monday, warning it was ‘the first of many to come’ – even though Khalil is a legal resident who has not been convicted of a crime.

Khalil – a Palestinian who was born and raised in Syria – helped to lead protests against Israel at Columbia University last year. He also acted as a negotiator between students and university officials. 

A judge has since stepped in to temporarily block the deportation of the 27-year-old pro-Palestine activist, pending a further ruling on the matter.

Homan, who has led Trump’s agenda on the border at full force, said that ‘absolutely we can’ deport green card holders such as Khalil. 

link

Information war plays by KOBK (Kill-Or-Be-Killed) game theory rules. Kill-Or-Be-Killed in this case is silencing, or ‘killing’, pro-Palestinian information to benefit Israel and ostensibly Jews, though this argument/battle may turn against Jews and do them more harm than good, much as the argument/battle against ‘men in women’s sports’ has devastated the ‘trans women are women’ argument. We the people must understand that freedom of speech is our best weapon against Big Government suppression of reason itself as well as individual rights. I am not sure where I stand on the above case. Selectively prosecuting people to help Jews is not good because: 1) in today’s world, it is not helping them as much as in the past; and 2) why should Jews get so much special treatment when it comes to information? Jewish Supremists have been playing the KOBK information game for centuries, with frenetic intensity for the past 100 plus years. Most readers of this site know all that. What I am pointing our today is at the core of information at large, there is often a KOBK battle. Different sides fight over the information. Leftists who believe Anthropogenic Global Warming support electric car mandates, but then burn Tesla dealers to harm Musk, whom they perceive as being right-wing. It’s all a KOBK battle over information hegemony. I conclude this is a major reason why we must keep promoting good/correct information while destroying bad/incorrect information. ABN

Musk reveals Ukraine may be behind ‘massive’ cyberattack on X

Elon Musk has revealed the large cyberattack that took down his social media app X on Monday seemingly originated in Ukraine

His revelation followed repeated glitches with the site, which has been down for much of the day. 

‘Well, we’re not sure exactly what happened,’ Musk told Fox Business Network on Monday afternoon. But there was a massive cyber attack to try to bring down the X system with IP addresses originating in the Ukraine area.’

Musk had confirmed earlier in the day that X was being targeted by a ‘massive cyberattack.’

The world’s richest man noted during the interview that the social media site is now back up and running.

His statement came after the platform had been down for users worldwide. They had complained about issues with the app and website since as early as 5:30am ET.

Musk shared on X that the hack involved so many resources that he believes it could only be the work of a ‘coordinated group’ or a foreign country.

link

Trump removes Antony Blinken, Letitia James, Alvin Bragg’s security clearances among others

President Donald Trump has decided to remove security clearances for several Democrats, including former Secretary of State Antony Blinken, Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, and New York Attorney General Letitia James, both of whom are vocal Trump critics. 

Former National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan, Biden’s Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco, and attorneys Andrew Weissmann, Mark Zaid and Norm Eisen.

The move comes a day after Trump stripped his predecessor, former President Joe Biden, of his security clearance and his access to presidential daily briefs. 

link

New angle on Livelsberger Las Vegas Tesla bomb incident — Michaela Fachar

I’m blowing the whistle. I’m done listening to this.

My name is Michaela Fachar. I am a U.S. Air Force veteran 1N0 All Source analyst. From October 2020-2021, I was deployed to the CENTCOM Air Operations Center at Al Udeid Air Base, Qatar.

I was an E-4 at the time, and my job was to process mission reports (MISREPS) from pilots conducting sorties within CENTCOM theatre. My job was to report on daily significant activity reports (SIGACTS) and publish graphic intel summaries (GRINTSUMS) to all air units in CENTCOM. Task forces reported a TON of UAP activity, but because we had no framework of reporting those requirements, we didn’t. There is evidence of all of this on Kessel Run, the databse that we process these reports on.

From October 2020 to around January 2021, I worked night shift, at a time when very few people worked. As I was reporting on events, news came of blue on blue fratricide [blue on blue means friendly fire]. While I was compiling the reporting, a CIA officer came out of his room and tapped me on the shoulder. He told me not to report on it. We had other blue on blue events, and we received orders to not report on those events due to the potential for “diplomatic scandals.”

I live on Fort Bragg, NC, and I am still in the individual ready reserve (IRR). I have reached out to Jeremy, Sarah Adams, Shawn Ryan, and Shoe separately, but have no received word from you.

I want to testify to Rep. Tim Burchett because I am concerned about the Biden administration and our national security apparatus. They lack a fundamental understanding of the national security picture with China, and they are ramping us up for war. I believe that what I witnessed can corroborate the concerns that Matt Livelsberg addressed in his email manifesto.

link

Fachar provides yet another warning on Chinese drone or plasmid UAPs and the danger they pose to USA. Her info is worth considering. I wonder how Shawn Ryan will deal with it. I doubt China is strong enough to take on USA or daring enough to try even if they were. That said, I do not dismiss Fachar’s warning or Livelsberger’s . And that said, who cannot see a scenario where scores of terrorist attacks occur in USA and the West. These will galvanize Western populations making them clamor for war. Add Trump (rightly) deporting millions of illegals, which in itself will accustom the public to thinking in large numbers… and we are all set for WW3, a massive battle in the Middle East which will result in USA destroying all of Israel’s enemies and establishing Greater Israel, while inside USA and the West, the public accedes to a super spy state with all the high tech in place forever because we (maybe) really will need it to ID terrorists. Is Fachar, Ryan, and many others preprogramming us for WW3? Forty million Zionist Christians will be ecstatic when it begins. When the muddle of indeterminable information meets kinetic war, action is all that matters. ABN

ALL Wikileaks files are now online

ALL Wikileaks files are now online.

A feast: Harpy Hillary’s emails; Vegas shooting by an FBI sniper; Steve Jobs’ letter on HIV; Afghanistan, Syria, Libya, Iran, Israel; the military-financial complex; Mafiosi galore; CIA agents arrested for rape; Conspiracy Heaven; CIA false-flags; WHO pandemic – and  more.

https://file.wikileaks.org/file/

Hillary’s emails:

https://file.wikileaks.org/file/clinton-emails/

Have a ball.

source

PSA concerning Shawn Ryan and MK-ULTRA

PSA concerning Shawn Ryan and MK-ULTRA

Shawn is actively involved (perhaps unwitting) in CIA and Co. military-media mind control programs stemming from MK-ULTRA.

Shawn’s former friend and SRS researcher became self-aware as a subject in MONARCH after I contacted them in early 2023. They were cut off from Shawn immediately – then there were attempts to route them to Monroe Institute – which is 100% known to be involved and is where many are sent for reprogramming or closeout.

This isn’t about slamming Shawn or the show, but issues have already been whitewashed. This is dangerous for the American people. SRS served just enough to hook a very important demographic and is an extremely effective limited hangout and narrative steering operation.

link

I have no idea what to make of this any more than I do of Shawn Ryan. Our universal inability to be certain of who or what is in power and what information is correct or false is the core basis of KOBK game theory. Shawn himself cannot be sure of where he is situated in whatever hierarchy he imagines he may be in. Neither can the hierarchs at the top, save in rare situations, be completely sure they are really at the top. Bosses get offed all the time. Our uncertainty of all information does not go away as we become more powerful, influential, or wealthy. Who controls Elon Musk? Surely, Elon knows, right? No, he has no idea if who he believes are his masters are his masters. Those ‘masters’ might just be messengers, handlers, spies. If one hierarch decisively defeats his rival he can probably be sure the rival has been defeated, but KOBK does not stop there because someone might stab him in the back in the next second. People at the top are surely holding themselves in a tight grid of oaths, omerta, volitional bribe material, and the sure threat of death and disgrace if they break rank. The reward is wealth and power. Top people probably can and do quit or retire but their oaths remain. Xi Jinping is an example of a particularly ruthless/strong hierarch. But now that China is declining, his hold is weakening. I would not be surprised if he were overthrown soon. It is important to note that Xi’s hold on power is weakening due to his bad policies, but more importantly due to growing popular opposition to his leadership. That’s all we the plebs ever have, but it is a lot. ABN

Steven Greer on deep black ops

I take all info with salt. Is SR a Tucker Carlson of his domain? No way to know. Greer? In a global (and cosmic) environment, all of us are playing some part. Each life matters. At what level is information valuable or distracting? Information considered occupies brain-space. All influencers are, in an important sense, is occupiers of brain-space and/or disseminators of information that occupies brain-space. ABN

Trump Urges SCOTUS to delay Tik Tok ban

The central argument is this. “Whether the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act (“the Act”), as applied to petitioners, violates the First Amendment.”

Congress enacted a law that effectively bans the social media app TikTok, or at the very least, forces the sale of the company to a non-foreign owned entity. The Supreme Court is scheduled to hear arguments on the First Amendment aspect. Biden signed the law that requires TikTok’s China-based parent company ByteDance to divest from the app or face a ban on U.S. networks and app stores.

Mitch McConnell [SEE HERE] and Mike Pence [See Here] are asking the Supreme Court to support the law and support the forced sale or ban. However, President Trump is urging the Supreme Court to be very careful.  [SEE HERE]

After initially supporting the ban on Tik Tok in 2020, President Trump changed his opinion and now contemplates whether a ban against the popular platform is in America’s best interest.

…Many people have wondered what changed President Trump’s mind, with some pointing to President Trump’s meeting with TikTok CEO Shou Chew at Mar-a-Lago earlier this month.   Additionally, Elon Musk and the Silicon Valley tech team, including JD Vance, are opposed to Tik Tok.  However, the shift in Trump’s thinking since 2020 makes sense if you look at the timeline.

TikTok is a content and information platform that presents a significant issue from an American perspective.  It is a Chinese platform available in the USA, but American platforms are banned in China. As a consequence, there is a particular conflict on geopolitical interests. Thus, in 2020 President Trump was against TikTok as an equity/fairness issue.

However, if most or all of the USA social media platforms are under the influence and control of government, which they are. And when President Trump became a victim from that influence and control, which he did. And when the only counterpoint for pushback against the Mis-Dis-Mal information scheme of the U.S. Govt., is to use an external platform to deliver information…. Then the relative issues in the platform discrimination argument take on a different context.

If you look at the timeline, after he was silenced by the U.S government’s influence in Big Tech, President Trump changed his position on Tik Tok.

link

Origin of cultural learning: babies imitate because they are imitated

For the study, the researchers looked at the interaction between mother and child over several months. The babies came into the lab for the first time at the age of 6 months, while their final visit was when they were 18 months old. As they engaged in various play situations, the interactions and imitations of mother and child were analyzed.

The longitudinal study shows that the more sensitive a mother was in her interactions with her six-month-old child and the more often she imitated the infant, the greater the child’s ability was at the age of 18 months to imitate others.

In the interaction between parents and child, mutual imitation is a sign of communication. Parents respond to the signals given by the child and reflect and amplify them. A mutual imitation of actions and gestures develops. “These experiences create connections between what the child feels and does on the one hand and what it sees on the other. Associations are formed. The child’s visual experience is connected to its own motor activity,” says Markus Paulus, explaining the neuro-cognitive process.

Children learn a variety of skills through imitation, such as how to use objects, cultural gestures like waving, and the acquisition of language. “Children are incredible imitators. Mimicry paves the way to their further development. Imitation is the start of the cultural process toward becoming human,” says Markus Paulus. In psychology, the theory that the ability to imitate is inborn held sway for a long time. The LMU study is further evidence that the ability is actually acquired.

source

Mutual imitation and/or rapport are fundamental to interpersonal communication and a constant of it. FIML practice is a metacognitive method for making these processes ‘objective’ and thus mutually understandable, analyzable, and correctable or transformable as needed or desired. FIML works with objective material, which is defined as material both partners agree on. Real-world, real-time mutually agreed upon moments of micro communication discovered during FIML practice are some of the best objective psychological material you will ever acquire. Analyzing it with your partner is a total blast! There is no other way to do it except through FIML practice. ABN

UPDATE: This study reveals the profound importance of imitation for the infant brain. Imitation is one of the first things humans learn and it establishes a basis for social interactions from then on. Imitation is a major foundation of all cultures. People within any culture always imitate each other a lot. This includes adults who form new cultures or conform to deep transitions within their already accepted cultures. Often, cultural transitions are so large, the original culture is lost to time. This instinct to keep up with the group through imitation is a major factor in behavioral mind-control. This video provides an excellent example of how blunt, crude, nasty and deeply fear-based mind-controlled cultural transitions often are. Not only are viewers lured into being terrified of the invisible virus, they are also bullied into conforming to the one and only way to save themselves—taking a dangerous and untested vax. When children and then babies were also sucked into this whirlpool of anti-science, all morality was gone and all that was left was fear and insane conformity. If the mind-controllers learned anything from this, they will probably leave pregnant women and babies alone next time. More likely is they will cause even greater fear. ABN

Study supports FIML practice

This study—Neural Correlates of People’s Hypercorrection of Their False Beliefs—supports the contention that FIML practice can produce deep, wide-ranging, and enduring changes within the brain/mind of practitioners.

The basic finding of the study is:

Despite the intuition that strongly held beliefs are particularly difficult to change, the data on error correction indicate that general information errors that people commit with a high degree of belief are especially easy to correct. (Emphasis added.)

According to the study, this happens due to:

…enhanced attention and encoding that results from a metacognitive mismatch between the person’s confidence in their responses and the true answer.

This is exactly what happens when a FIML query shows the questioner that his/her assumptions about what their partner’s thoughts or intentions were wrong.

Initially, FIML partners may experience some embarrassment or disbelief at being wrong. But since FIML queries are generally based on negative impressions, after some practice being shown to be wrong will typically produce feelings of relief and even delight.

A FIML query will generally arise out of a state of “enhanced attention” and usually further increase it by being spoken about. Incidentally, this is probably the most difficult aspect of FIML practice—controlling the emotions that accompany enhanced attention, especially when that attention concerns our own emotional reactions.

With continued practice of FIML, however, even strongly held erroneous interpersonal beliefs will be fairly easily corrected whenever they are discovered during a FIML discussion. Correcting core false beliefs (mistaken interpretations) has a wide-ranging, beneficial effect on all aspects of a person’s life.

Since the hypercorrection effect discussed in the linked study only occurs during moments of enhanced attention, the FIML technique of focusing quickly on good data agreed upon by both partners can be seen as a way of inducing states of enhanced attention that will lead to deep changes in both partners. This technique (using good data) also turns the discussion from one about feelings to one about “information,” which the study finds makes errors “especially easy to correct.”

Furthermore, since FIML practice tends to deal with very small incidents, the enhanced attention FIML induces works like a laser that quickly and painlessly excises erroneous thoughts and feelings while they are still small and have not been allowed to grow into full-blown emotional reactions.

first posted OCTOBER 31, 2015

Tucker Carlson’s Non-Denial Denialism of the Holocaust

Well, the Jewish Lobby is at it again. In the latest kerfuffle over “Holocaust denial,” Jews and their sycophants are in an uproar over a podcast interview aired on September 2 in which Tucker Carlson spoke at length with a “popular historian” named Darryl Cooper. The two-hour episode is titled “The True History of the Jonestown Cult, WWII, and How Winston Churchill Ruined Europe”—a bit of a stretch for a single show, but with the central theme that conventional or orthodox history is often wrong about events small and large, and thus frequently in need of revision. History is not only written by the victors, it is sustained by powerful lobbies that have a vested interest in a certain interpretation of past events. This much is so obvious that it scarcely needs mentioning.

And yet, when it comes to World War Two and especially the Holocaust, all rules go out the window. The “victors” cannot be named; alternate interpretations are not allowed; and revisionism is declared a crime. In the interview, Cooper offers the mildest of mild statements regarding his thoughts on WW2 and on what happened to “civilians and prisoners of war” at that time. Two points seemed to have raised the greatest ire: that Churchill, not Hitler, was the true villain of the war; and that the millions of people who died—presumably meaning millions of Jews—were, in effect, accidental victims rather than targets of a premediated and planned genocide. Our cultural guardians are upset by the first point but truly enraged by the second.

The horror of stating such views was too much for both our Jewish media and for our Jewish-inspired Biden regime. The headlines are alarming: “Tucker Carlson Criticized for Hosting Holocaust Revisionist” (NYT); “Tucker Carlson Welcomes a Hitler Apologist to His Show” (NYT, Michelle Goldberg); “White House condemns Tucker Carlson’s ‘Nazi propaganda’ interview as ‘disgusting and sadistic insult’” (CNN); “Tucker Carlson Blasted for Interview with Holocaust Revisionist” (The Hill). CNN reports that the Biden administration took the unusual step of publicly “denouncing Tucker Carlson” and his guest. Deputy press secretary Andrew Bates issued a formal statement, not only calling the interview “a disgusting and sadistic insult to all Americans” but also condemning Carlson for “giving a microphone to a Holocaust denier who spreads Nazi propaganda.” Bates’ chief concern seems to be with “the over 6 million Jews who were genocidally murdered by Adolf Hitler.” “Hitler was one of the most evil figures in human history,” Bates assures us—“full stop.” Certainly no revisionism allowed in this most “freedom-loving” of nations.

This whole incident is worthy of some reflection. Let me start with what exactly Cooper said. Here are the relevant statements (from 46:30 to 49:00):

When [the Germans] went into the East, in 1941, they launched a war where they were completely unprepared to deal with the millions and millions of prisoners of war, local political prisoners, and so forth, that they were going to have to handle. They went in with no plan for that. And they just threw these people into camps and millions of people ended up dead there.

You have letters as early as July, August 1941 from commandants of these makeshift camps that they’re setting up for these millions of people who were surrendering or people they are rounding up. And it’s two months after [Operation] Barbarossa was launched [in June], and they’re writing back to the high command in Berlin saying, “We can’t feed these people…” And one of them actually says, “Rather than wait for them all to slowly starve this winter, wouldn’t it be more humane to just finish them off quickly now?”

At the end of the day, [Hitler] launched that war [against the USSR] with no plan to care for the millions and millions of civilians and prisoners of war that were going to come under [his] control. And millions of people died because of that.

link

Good essay, food for thought. Provides a brief, interesting outline of the information chaos surrounding WW2 and who died the most and why and who to believe. When there are laws against interpretations of historical events, you can be sure something is deeply wrong. ABN