Tag: law
Good discussion of 2020 election fraud and what Congress can do about it
Sidney Powell on 2020 Election Lawsuits
Texas GOP Chairman Allen West’s Statement on Supreme Court Decision
The Supreme Court, in tossing the Texas lawsuit that was joined by seventeen states and 106 US congressman, has decreed that a state can take unconstitutional actions and violate its own election law. Resulting in damaging effects on other states that abide by the law, while the guilty state suffers no consequences. This decision establishes a precedent that says states can violate the US constitution and not be held accountable. This decision will have far-reaching ramifications for the future of our constitutional republic. Perhaps law-abiding states should bond together and form a Union of states that will abide by the constitution.
According to SCOTUS, voters in a federal election and all citizens, including the president, have “no standing”? Justice Kavanaugh, we backed you when you were insulted, shamed, vilified, but you turn your back on us now? ABN
Very good piece on the SCOTUS decision to punt
There is no short passage that covers the gist of this essay, which is not long, so I am just providing the title and link: The Meaning Of The Alito/Thomas “Statement”.
The Alito/Thomas statement of dissent is key to understanding the crux of why the SCOTUS decision to run and hide is a disgrace. Half the country at least is concerned about conspicuous fraud and does not believe the results are honest. But according to SCOTUS we have no “standing” to bring the case to them.
There is an argument that defends the court by saying if they took this case, they would be forced to take many other cases concerning the residents of one state claiming harm by the actions of another state. But this argument is weak since SCOTUS has “original jurisdiction” concerning disputes between states; and there could hardly be a more serious dispute than this one.
Riveting analysis on the deliberate misuse of language: Phillip Kline on Wisconsin election fraud
Pennsylvania responds
In case you ever wanted to know what is legalspeak for REEEEEEEE, now you know. This is the introduction to the PA Supreme Court filing. It’s not exactly impressive.
Texas seeks to invalidate elections in four states for yielding results with which it disagrees. Its request for this Court to exercise its original jurisdiction and then anoint Texas’s preferred candidate for President is legally indefensible and is an afront to principles of constitutional democracy.
What Texas is doing in this proceeding is to ask this Court to reconsider a mass of baseless claims about problems with the election that have already been considered, and rejected, by this Court and other courts. It attempts to exploit this Court’s sparingly used original jurisdiction to relitigate those matters. But Texas obviously lacks standing to bring such claims, which, in any event, are barred by laches, and are moot, meritless, and dangerous. (link)
MOTION OF DONALD J. TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, TO INTERVENE IN HIS PERSONAL CAPACITY AS CANDIDATE FOR RE-ELECTION, PROPOSED BILL OF COMPLAINT IN INTERVENTION, AND BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO INTERVENE
Well-worth reading. A sample below:
…In the 2020 election, under the guise of responding to the COVID-19 pandemic, election officials in several key states, sometimes on their own and sometimes in connection with court actions brought by partisan advocates, made a systematic effort to weaken measures to ensure fair and impartial elections by creating new rules for the conduct of the elections—rules that were never approved by the legislatures of the defendant states as required by Article II of the United States Constitution. These new rules were aimed at weakening, ignoring, or overriding provisions of state law that are aimed at ensuring the integrity of the voting process.
As more particularly alleged in the Bill of Complaint filed by the State of Texas, for the first time in history, these officials flooded their States with millions of ballots sent through the mail, or placed in drop boxes, with little or no chain of custody and, at the same time, intentionally weakened or eliminated the few existing security measures protecting the integrity of the vote—signature verification and witness requirements.
For example, Pennsylvania’s Secretary of State issued guidance purporting to suspend the signature verification requirements, in direct violation of state law. In Michigan, the Secretary of State illegally flooded the state with absentee ballot applications mailed to every registered voter despite the fact that state law strictly limits the ballot application process. In Wisconsin, the largest cities all deployed hundreds of unmanned, unsecured absentee ballot drop boxes that were all invalid means of returning absentee votes under state law. In Georgia, the Secretary of State instituted a series of unlawful policies, including processing ballots weeks before election day and destructively revising signature and identity verification procedures.
In all cases, absentee ballots were mailed to people without even a perfunctory attempt to verify the recipient’s identity or eligibility to vote, including residency, citizenship, and criminal records. When returned and counted, the ballots were typically separated from their security envelopes, divorcing them from any information that could have helped determine whether the votes were legally cast. (link to original)
Oath of office of the President of the United States
I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.
DECLARATION OF DR. NAVID KESHAVARZ-NIA on election fraud
…I conclude with high confidence that the election 2020 data were altered in all battleground states resulting in a hundreds of thousands of votes that were cast for President Trump to be transferred to Vice President Biden. These alterations were the result of systemic and widespread exploitable vulnerabilities in DVS, Scytl/SOE Software and Smartmatic systems that enabled operators to achieve the desired results. In my view, the evidence is overwhelming and incontrovertible.
EXECUTED ON: November 25, 2020 By: Navid Keshavarz-Nia, Ph.D., Ed.D
The above quote is from the conclusion. The entire declaration is well worth reading. It’s nine pages and can be found here.
Good overview of how election fraud may be resolved
“It is indeed a very foul mess… and I am going to expose every one of them”: Sidney Powell on election FRAUD
Strongest words thus far on what a majority of Americans now realize was criminal election fraud; a conspiracy to steal massive numbers of votes and overthrow the US federal government.
Rudy Giuliani: “I have an email that didn’t come out in the Post…”
Big Tech CENSORS real news. Does anyone really want this?
This is the story they are censoring: Smoking-gun email reveals how Hunter Biden introduced Ukrainian businessman to VP dad.
And here is more information about that: Bookmark Today’s Date – Big Tech Has Crossed The Event Horizon to Protect Joe Biden…
