A protein in the lungs that blocks Covid and forms a natural barrier to the virus has been discovered by scientists at the University of Sydney.
The naturally occurring protein, LRRC15, works by attaching itself to the virus like Velcro, preventing the Covid particles from binding with more vulnerable cells – as well as reducing the chance of infection.
The astonishing find may finally explain why some people suffer serious illness with the virus, or even death, while others never get sick or appear symptomless.
LRRC15 is not known to be present in humans until the virus enters the body, but it appears after infection.
Christie Grace is a specialist in RNA and lipid nanoparticles and was a project manager at the top plasmid company in the world manufacturing recombinant proteins such as monoclonal antibodies, CRISPR, SpCas9, gene editing, and IVT mRNA production.
For two years Christie has been raising the alarm over harms that can be caused by lipid nanoparticles and has concerns over cold chain management, vaccine production quality assurance/control and the medical community’s unwillingness to look at the scientific data.
This is a deep and specific conversation delving into the science of lipid nanoparticles which may become the next target for scientific investigation of vaccination injuries and death.
UPDATE: I’ve watched 20 minutes of this video and it is excellent! ABN
UPDATE2: Grace says the fibrous clots we have been seeing in cadavers are real and explains how and why they form from the lipid nanoparticles, at ~ 20 min point. ABN
UPDATE3: Just finished the entire interview. It’s very good. Grace brings a new point of view due to her expertise in nanoparticles and manufacturing monoclonals. She says, ‘At the end of the day, the vaccine is a total failure.’
The video falters a little at the end as Grace and Wong wrestle with politics and science and not sounding crazy. Factor in jabbing children and babies, masks and vax mandates in schools and military, lockdowns, banning IVM and HCQ, mandating Remdesivir in hospitals and much more and it’s clear the science of covid is also political science. Great interview, don’t miss it. ABN
Researching our book—The Courage to Face COVID-19: Preventing Hospitalization and Death While Battling the Bio-Pharmaceutical Complex—was often a distressing and maddening experience. The systematic lying about hydroxychloroquine to suppress its use in the outpatient setting was infuriating. However, for me, the most upsetting stories were about people who died in hospital after being systematically denied ivermectin. The sheer brutality of hospital chiefs and their attorneys, who fought tooth and nail against the administration of ivermectin to dying patients, must surely be the most morally repugnant story in modern medical history.
As of the latest CDC NowCast Update, we really only have one variant which is of concern nationwide. It is in the tail of its Hope-Simpson season in the northeastern states.
Question is, what happens next? No new Course of variants has arisen.
Evidence has emerged casting serious doubt over the authenticity of tests carried out by BioNTech (Marketing Authorisation Holder) and Pfizer to prove the fidelity of their product by demonstrating that only the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 is expressed in cells by the nucleoside-modified mRNA Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine (BNT162b2).
Several Western Blot tests were conducted to evaluate the protein expression of the mRNA in HEK cells transfected with the vaccine taken from different lots. Using this technique, the expressed proteins showed up as highly unusual looking ‘bands.’
Certain independent scientific experts have described these Western blots as the “smoking gun” evidence (particularly the “duplication” of the results) which suggest that BioNTech and Pfizer falsified key data as part of their submissions to the European Medicines Agency and the Federal Drugs Agency for securing emergency use authorisation (conditional) and later marketing authorisation approval of their product.
The bombshell evidence was dropped without so much as a ripple in the sea of brewing scandals washing up on the shores of the behemoth pharmaceutical company and its partner, BioNTech. However, some in the scientific community have taken notice and written about this scandal, known on social media as #Blotgate.
The fact there could be actual evidence to prove that Pfizer and BioNTech engaged in fraud by fabricating critical data would have major ramifications. For instance, their indemnity status (protection from any legal liability resulting from deaths or injuries caused by their product) which was written into their purchasing contracts and signed by many countries, would cease to apply.
prompted to start at beginning of the Healthy User Bias explanation
Basically, wealthy people are healthier. When that is accounted for, we find zero vaccine efficacy. So, for no efficacy you incur considerable vaccine risk. Not a good deal. ABN
Can anyone explain how all-cause mortality in the UK in April 2020 spiked at exactly the same time in every region when travel routes into the UK are overwhelmingly via the South East?
Travel is undertaken by only a fraction of the population at any one time, so the idea that “COVID” could be spread by travel as explanation of this sporadic pattern of worldwide spread seems unlikely.
It should spread locally – predominantly.
Yet there was basically no increase in all-cause mortality outside of Wuhan in mainland China for 2 years.
This is truly a major finding. Be sure to look at the Twitter link just above as the author answers follow-up questions.
UPDATE: In addition to everything included in the above thread, what is also explained is the explosive spread of covid in China following their ending of zero-covid policies in November 2022. In previous posts I have commented on this not being possible through natural spread but only through deliberate release of the pathogen by drones and other means. This also implicates China in the origin and spread of early covid-19 as they are using the same MO.
Furthermore, this explains how both China and bad actors in the West may have or probably did conspire to do this in concert to: 1) remove Trump from office by creating new rules that permit election fraud; 2) aggrandize power through medical tyranny; and 3) relieve China of the psychological and economic burden of losing the trade war to Trump.
This also contributes to our understanding of a major anomaly in the Ukraine War, namely all NATO/neocon policies appear to have been designed not only to harm Russia but also to destroy Ukraine; to force civilians to flee to other countries while also killing as many military-age men as possible. What’s worse is NATO neocon policies also appear to be designed to provoke a nuclear war between Europe/USA and Russia—and this indicates the top designers of these policies are not Westerners. From that line of thought we can also theorize that the release of covid on the world may have been done at the top by non-Western actors, many of whom have infiltrated Western institutions and surely compromised many Westerners into cooperating.
We may also surmise that China has been infecting its own people for over two months: to remove the weak; to discipline those who remain; to destroy internal enemies in large numbers under cover of covid; to prepare not to take Taiwan but for WW3, which will begin in Europe-Russia, spread to include USA, and probably then include China. If any of this is true, the greatest danger before us is these bad actors must act—they must use nukes—before their plans are widely understood or understood by people in top positions who might be able to stop them, if there are any such people. ABN
“After querying all pilots across the DOD, for all-cause morbidity and mortality, I found a stunning increase in the number of reportable events, spiking from an average of 226 reportable events a year (2016-2019) to 4,059 reports in 2022,” she explained.
A DOD reportable event is any patient safety event resulting in death, permanent harm, or severe temporary harm—and all require a comprehensive systematic analysis and a follow-on corrective action implementation plan report.
“The point is there is a statistically significant increase in death, permanent harm, or severe temporary harm in young healthy fit pilots,” she continued.
Such injuries were more obviously shown in this population. Because aviation pilots are required to have a superior level of health and fitness, and their health conditions are under more strict monitoring, according to Long.
I’m a simple guy. If you’ve developed a 95% effective vaccine that’s a safe preventative for the 3rd leading cause of death in your society, then total deaths CANNOT increase. Any attempt to attribute that increase in death to something else is farcical because, sure, it’s possible, but it’s blatantly unreasonable. I’m an attorney, and I remind people that we don’t execute criminals based on proof; we execute them based on proof BEYOND a reasonable doubt. When you start vaccinating & total deaths increase, you have no reasonable doubt – the vaccines must end. Over-intellectualizing, over-thinking are extremely dangerous trends, especially for the intelligent. It’s very easy to persuade yourself that there’s some universe in which these vaccines work, or there are 73 genders, or that socialism just hasn’t been tried, but none of these beliefs are reasonable – they’re all nuts.
It’s really very simple: if you “cure” the third leading cause of death, then total deaths MUST decline. Anyone claiming there’s an exception to that rule must present extraordinary evidence, not speculation. Indeed, the exception would be obvious (like CA fell into the ocean & drowned millions). It’s not some BS about masks make people sad, which makes them sick…such subtle things are not plausible in light of the obvious: you’ve “cured” the 3rd leading cause of death but deaths increased.
Please stop taking the world “reasonable” out of your analysis/discussions. It’s great that you have theories about how the vaccines might not be to blame, but are those theories reasonable? That’s the threshold question we must demand our adversaries answer. (You reason from what you know to what you don’t, not from what you don’t know. We know deaths are increasing despite the cure; what do we infer from that? Granted, we don’t know why deaths are increasing, but so what? Uncertainty drives INACTION, not action. That is, you don’t vaccinate until you know it’s unsafe; you STOP vaccinating until you KNOW it’s safe.
The full article is well-worth reading and can be found here: A Weltanschauung causal model of excess deaths. This article provides an excellent overview of the factors in a statistical model and how to consider them. Many readers may already appreciate the problems. I am glad I read the whole thing because it is valuable confirmation. But the comment above is more or less how I felt at the end. Next to all the science arguments is an argument about rhetoric. How do we best present our case so it is noticed but not so sensational or oversimplified it can be easily refuted with concomitant simplifications? In my view, we need to be brief and forceful in what we say. Some amount of error, oversimplification, and sensationalism must be tolerated if it communicates with more people and/or gets them to research the topic and discover supporting complexities themselves. We have the winning argument and should sound like it when addressing a wide audience. Lives are at stake. My own brother was deeply affected by Died Suddenly. That’s an example of the power of rhetoric. He has done more research and reading since viewing that film than anything else. ABN
American Buddhist Net 