The Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare (NBHW) recently published new treatment guidelines which completely abandon recommendations that children with gender identity issues undergo so-called “gender-affirming care.”
Sweden’s new treatment guidelines for youth with “gender dysphoria,” which came out last week, say that the first line of treatment should be psychosocial support rather than giving kids dangerous drugs to stop puberty or mutilating their bodies.
“Psychosocial support that helps the young person live with the body’s pubertal development without medication needs to be the first option when choosing care measures,” the new guidelines read.
According to NBHW, “the risks of puberty suppressing treatment with GnRH-analogues and gender-affirming hormonal treatment currently outweigh the possible benefits, and that the treatments should be offered only in exceptional cases.”
“Although the prevalence of detransition is still unknown, the knowledge that it occurs and that gender confirming treatment thus may lead to a deteriorating of health and quality of life (i.e. harm), is important for the overall judgment and recommendation,” the new guidelines explain.
Another factor that played a role in Sweden’s decision to ditch WPATH’s guidelines was the sharp rise in the number of young people with gender dysphoria for no clear reason, especially among teenage girls who had never had gender distress before.
I’m getting a lot of questions on how do we FIGHT BACK against MEDICAL INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX and BIG PHARMA.
Here’s what I think, we need to use the SAME tactics that PHARMA uses against us. Let me share with you one.
2. In the Pharma industry, you must understand that there is a SYMBIOTIC relationship between Physicians and Pharma. Physicians are people like us too. They also want to have career progressions like the rest of us.
3. One of the paths to progress your career is by riding Pharma’s machinery.
In Pharma, we categorize a group of Physicians as Key Opinion Leaders.
4. What are key opinion leaders? Basically, we rank every doctor according to 4 criteria.
a. The number of papers they published
b. The number of talks they have given
c. The frequency of talks they have given
d. Their medical association/ranks
There are other criterias too.
5. “Key Opinion Leaders” are doctors who SHAPES the general conversation or narratives. For example, these are the ones that will say “The Vaccines are Safe and Effective” and all other doctors simply follow their guidelines.
6. You must understand that doctors are extremely busy with patients/paper work. They don’t have much time to read and critically analyse Clinical Papers/Research etc.
7. One of the things that doctors MUST do to maintain their license is to get CME Points. They need CME points to renew their medical license to continue their work. CME stands for “Continuous Medical Education”.
8. CME Points are awarded by regulators on Speaker Events and conferences. These events and conferences are like educational talks where a doctor must go to renew their knowledge, get the points and renew the licenses. It’s called “CME Accredited Events”.
[This is an important thread. It clearly shows how doctors are brought into a system of controlled thought through a process that continuously maintains that system. Since we all experienced this aberrant medical system first-hand during covid, we should be able to rather easily extrapolate it to academia, police, military, law, journalism, politics, and so on. Our society and its “mass formation psychosis” has been engineered in this way over several generations beginning at the end of WW2. Virtually all professions and most walks of life have been indoctrinated into systems much like the one described in this post. ABN]
Before this study, there was no prospective data on post-vaccination myocardial lesions during vaccination with an RNA vaccine. Only the most serious myocarditis hospitalized has been reported, mainly affecting men under the age of 18.
The actual incidence of post-vaccination myocardial lesions is 2.8% vs 0.0035% myocarditis in retrospective studies
Myocardial lesions affect women more, contrary to what is described in previous studies.
The possibility of repeated doses of vaccine to maintain effective vaccination coverage should lead to great caution regarding possible repeated myocardial lesions and their impacts on possible cardiovascular complications.
Transgender women on hormone therapy may be at a higher risk for cardiovascular problems, such as stroke, blood clots and heart attack, researchers reported Monday.
The study was done by reviewing eight years of medical records of nearly 5,000 transgender patients in the Kaiser Health system, and looked at patients over the age of 18 who took hormones for gender transition. Over 97,000 cisgender patients — people whose sex assigned at birth matches their gender identity — with similar age and health characteristics were studied for comparison.
The study found that transgender women, who are assigned the male sex at birth, were twice as likely as cisgender men or women to have the blood clot condition venous thromboembolism. Transgender women on hormone therapy were also found to be 80 to 90 percent more likely to have stroke or a heart attack than cisgender women.
In the present study,bloodsamplesof 1,006 symptomatic subjects after one or more anti-COVID mRNA injectionsfromPfizer/BioNTech or Moderna wereanalyzed under anoptical microscope in the dark-field. Of the 1,006 cases, 948 (94.23% )showed various alterations in their blood. Aggregation of erythrocytes were highlighted and exogenous point-like and self-luminescent particles in the dark-fieldweredetected. The luminescence of those particles was markedly higher than that of oxygenated red blood cell walls. The particulate infiltrates, whatever they may consist of, gave the appearance of a starry skyat night.All of the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research2(2), August 12, 2022 Page | 402https://doi.org/10.56098/ijvtpr.v2i2 https://doi.org/10.56098/ijvtpr.v2i2.47abnormal blood samples of injected persons, the 948 cases,showed tubular/fibrous formations and frequently also crystalline and lamellar formations with extremely complex but consistently similar morphologiesacross all of the patients with abnormal blood samples.Our results are so similar to those of Lee et al. (2022) that it could be claimed that, except for our innovative application of dark-field microscopyto mark the foreign metal-like objects in the blood of mRNA injections from Pfizer or Moderna, we have replicated the blood work of the Korean doctors with a much larger sample.
An exploration of the perverse economic incentives in the practice of medicine and the obstacles faced in treating COVID vaccine injuries.
I have always been fascinated by the subject of free will, and continually saddened by observing individuals choosing to relinquish the spontaneity they inherited as living conscious beings. In turn, I’ve tried to touch upon how predictable psychological patterning, external influences, and predefined thought patterns help to explain many of the abhorrent behaviors we’ve observed from the medical profession, the scientific authorities, and the general public over the last three years.
•How the harsh medical training each doctor goes through leaves them with an existential need to believe their practice of medicine is safe and effective (retained emotional patterning, such as that resulting from traumatic experiences, exerts an enormous influence over most people’s lives).
•How the current academic system trains people to forfeit their critical thinking and instead follow rigidly defined cognitive algorithms, which prevents most of those it trains from arriving at inconvenient conclusions while simultaneously zealously believing in each defense they provide for the orthodoxy.
Former federal MP Dr Kerryn Phelps has revealed she and her wife both suffered serious and ongoing injures from Covid vaccines, while suggesting the true rate of adverse events is far higher than acknowledged due to underreporting and “threats” from medical regulators.
In an explosive submission to Parliament’s Long Covid inquiry, the former Australian Medical Association (AMA) president has broken her silence about the “devastating” experience — emerging as the most prominent public health figure in the country to speak up about the taboo subject.
“This is an issue that I have witnessed first-hand with my wife who suffered a severe neurological reaction to her first Pfizer vaccine within minutes, including burning face and gums, paraesethesiae, and numb hands and feet, while under observation by myself, another doctor and a registered nurse at the time of immunisation,” the 65-year-old said.
“I continue to observe the devastating effects a year-and-a-half later with the addition of fatigue and additional neurological symptoms including nerve pains, altered sense of smell, visual disturbance and musculoskeletal inflammation. The diagnosis and causation has been confirmed by several specialists who have told me that they have seen ‘a lot’ of patients in a similar situation.”
Approx. 2 years after the mRNA “vaccine” was first administered, a majority of American people are concerned about side effects association with the treatment. A recent Rasmussen poll of 1,000 U.S. American adults conducted on November 30-December 1, 2022 shows that fifty-seven percent (57%) are concerned that COVID-19 vaccines may have major side effects, including 31% who are “Very Concerned”.
It seems that the independent media and word of mouth is having a larger impact on people’s opinions than government health officials and the mass media who are working hard to convince Americans that the Vaccine is “Safe and Effective”.
Another grim finding by the poll showed that of the vaccinated adults polled; a whopping 41% respondents had either a major (7%) or minor side effect (34%):
American Buddhist Net 