Tag: medical science

Even with conservative lag, we’re still at a 7-sigma Excess Non-Covid Natural Cause Mortality

~ ABN ~ Leave a comment

MMWR Wk 35 Update from today's CDC drop.

First, the contention that lag adjust is no longer needed is misinfo. Ignore the idiots.

Below is our lag curve performance for this week – it is suitably conservative, AND as figures come out of lag, they are actually showing higher.

Now that we have addressed lag disinfo, let's jump right to Cancers. I capped this at 8-sigma & DID NOT EVEN USE the lag calcs here anyway.

The actuals, out of the lag window, are rising FAST – confirm my lag calcs as sound/conservative.

PFE is only a very small part of this.

Now remember, none of the Cancer metrics you just saw include

– records still missing
– records which were reassigned
– records still stuck in the R99 bucket (below)

Continue reading “Even with conservative lag, we’re still at a 7-sigma Excess Non-Covid Natural Cause Mortality” →

‘Stunning’: The Real Reason Health Officials Won’t Let Independent Scientists Examine mRNA Vaccine Vials

~ ABN ~ Leave a comment
  • The reason health officials don’t want individual vaccine vials examined by independent scientists is that the vials are all different — and the mRNA in the shots is not intact.
  • For an effective mRNA product, the mRNA integrity needs to be 100%, meaning all the RNA must be intact. Considering how ineffective the jabs are, it seems fair to question whether lack of mRNA integrity might be to blame.
  • Fragmented RNA could potentially also be hazardous to health by generating incomplete spike proteins. While we do not know if incomplete spike proteins are dangerous, it’s possible they might contribute to cellular stress.
  • The “bad batch” phenomenon may also be indicative of quality problems. Independent investigations have revealed that some lots of the shots are associated with very severe side effects and death, whereas other lots have very few or no adverse events associated with their use.
  • However, the fact that “hot” lots are being released in a coordinated fashion suggests vaccine makers may in fact be doing intentional lethal-dose testing on the public, and that these “bad batches” are not merely the result of intermittently poor manufacturing.

link

Covid vaccines are far worse than covid itself and mandating them for young adults is glaringly unethical ~ study

~ ABN ~ Leave a comment
Abstract

Students at North American universities risk disenrollment due to third dose COVID-19 vaccine mandates. We present a risk-benefit assessment of boosters in this age group and provide five ethical arguments against mandates. We estimate that 22,000 – 30,000 previously uninfected adults aged 18-29 must be boosted with an mRNA vaccine to prevent one COVID-19 hospitalisation. Using CDC and sponsor-reported adverse event data, we find that booster mandates may cause a net expected harm: per COVID-19 hospitalisation prevented in previously uninfected young adults, we anticipate 18 to 98 serious adverse events, including 1.7 to 3.0 booster-associated myocarditis cases in males, and 1,373 to 3,234 cases of grade ≥3 reactogenicity which interferes with daily activities. Given the high prevalence of post-infection immunity, this risk-benefit profile is even less favourable. University booster mandates are unethical because: 1) no formal risk-benefit assessment exists for this age group; 2) vaccine mandates may result in a net expected harm to individual young people; 3) mandates are not proportionate: expected harms are not outweighed by public health benefits given the modest and transient effectiveness of vaccines against transmission; 4) US mandates violate the reciprocity principle because rare serious vaccine-related harms will not be reliably compensated due to gaps in current vaccine injury schemes; and 5) mandates create wider social harms. We consider counter-arguments such as a desire for socialisation and safety and show that such arguments lack scientific and/or ethical support. Finally, we discuss the relevance of our analysis for current 2-dose CCOVIDovid-19 vaccine mandates in North America.

COVID-19 Vaccine Boosters for Young Adults: A Risk-Benefit Assessment and Five Ethical Arguments against Mandates at Universities

Here’s the COVID-origin debate footnote that explains everything

~ ABN ~ Leave a comment

Here’s the COVID-origin debate footnote that explains everything:

98%-100% of research/articles defending the natural origin were paid for by taxpayers
Almost ALL lab-origin leaning research was unfunded/self-funded
Yet, we persisted

@TyCardon @chrismartenson @EthicalSkeptic

[2/3]
In other words, American taxpayers have paid for the experiments that may have caused this pandemic, & every penny to cover up all of that research, & well as the trillions in response.
Yet Fauci releases blank pieces of paper FOR FOIA’s
@quay_dr @R_H_Ebright @BretWeinstein

[3/3]
Further,
The scientists who’ve gaslighted all of us have sacrificed nothing – in fact, they’ve been rewarded with MORE taxpayer $
Any member of Congress who won’t stand for an origin inv. [with 1M 🇺🇸dead] has no place representing the living
@alykhansatchu @thackerpd

[4/3]
However, I have no reservations about standing up for the dead who deserve justice.
And doing so hasn’t come without a cost⬇️
So be it.
I gave DC plenty of warning that I was coming, and I’m going to stay here until justice is obtained

Continue reading “Here’s the COVID-origin debate footnote that explains everything” →

Study shows SARS-CoV-2 progenitor “may have emerged in June-July 2019 and that viruses with mutations characterizing B.1 strain may have been spreading globally before the first Wuhan outbreak”

~ ABN ~ Leave a comment

Abstract

As a reference laboratory for measles and rubella surveillance in Lombardy, we evaluated the association between SARS-CoV-2 infection and measles-like syndromes, providing preliminary evidence for undetected early circulation of SARS-CoV-2. Overall, 435 samples from 156 cases were investigated. RNA from oropharyngeal swabs (N = 148) and urine (N = 141) was screened with four hemi-nested PCRs and molecular evidence for SARS-CoV-2 infection was found in 13 subjects. Two of the positive patients were from the pandemic period (2/12, 16.7%, March 2020–March 2021) and 11 were from the pre-pandemic period (11/44, 25%, August 2019–February 2020). Sera (N = 146) were tested for anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG, IgM, and IgA antibodies. Five of the RNA-positive individuals also had detectable anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. No strong evidence of infection was found in samples collected between August 2018 and July 2019 from 100 patients. The earliest sample with evidence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA was from September 12, 2019, and the positive patient was also positive for anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies (IgG and IgM). Mutations typical of B.1 strains previously reported to have emerged in January 2020 (C3037T, C14408T, and A23403G), were identified in samples collected as early as October 2019 in Lombardy. One of these mutations (C14408T) was also identified among sequences downloaded from public databases that were obtained by others from samples collected in Brazil in November 2019. We conclude that a SARS-CoV-2 progenitor capable of producing a measles-like syndrome may have emerged in late June-late July 2019 and that viruses with mutations characterizing B.1 strain may have been spreading globally before the first Wuhan outbreak. Our findings should be complemented by high-throughput sequencing to obtain additional sequence information. We highlight the importance of retrospective surveillance studies in understanding the early dynamics of COVID-19 spread and we encourage other groups to perform retrospective investigations to seek confirmatory proofs of early SARS-CoV-2 circulation.

link

We, the medical doctors and scientists from all over the world, declare that there is an international medical crisis due to the diseases and deaths co-related to the administration of products known as “COVID-19 vaccines”

~ ABN ~ Leave a comment

Therefore, the following measures must be undertaken on an urgent basis:

  1. A worldwide ‘stop’ to the national inoculation campaigns with the products known as “COVID-19 vaccines”.
  2. Investigation of all sudden deaths of people who were healthy previous to the inoculation.
  3. Implementation of early detection programs of cardiovascular events which could lead to sudden deaths with analysis such as D-dimer and Troponin, in all those that were inoculated with the products known as “COVID-19 vaccines”, as well as the early detection of serious tumors.
  4. Implementation of research and treatment programs for victims of adverse effects after receiving the so called “COVID-19 vaccine”.
  5. Undertaking analyses of the composition of vials of Pfizer, Moderna, Astra Zeneca, Janssen, Sinovac, Sputnik V and any other product known as “COVID-19 vaccines”, by independent research groups with no affiliation to pharmaceutical companies, nor any conflict of interest.
  6. Studies to be conducted on the interactions between the different components of the so called “COVID-19 vaccines” and their molecular, cellular and biological effects.
  7. Implementation of psychological help and compensation programs for any person that has developed a disease or disability as a consequence of the so called “COVID-19 vaccines”.
  8. Implementation and promotion of psychological help and compensation programs for the family members of any person who died as a result of having been inoculated with the product known as “COVID-19 vaccines”.

link to article containing declaration, videos, and more information

Perdocent – Opposite of the Autodidact

~ ABN ~ Leave a comment
The perdocent exploits the claim of not having been taught how to do something, as a means of not understanding, of taking control, or to avoid doing any actual work. As a management professional, no matter their appeal to credential, never let a perdocent take control. Always seek to maintain familiarity with the perdocent’s tactics of ego, laziness, and cleverly concealed dishonesty.
link