Nolan is an interesting man and the subject is fascinating. This interview is worth watching, but the interviewer gets in the way far too much. A good interviewer should bring out the thoughts and ideas of the interviewee. Michels wastes far too much time talking himself or cutting to silly street scenes. ABN
Tag: science
The China did it on purpose hypothesis gets stronger
So this analysis now becomes … not just very important, but pivotal…
Omicron bore a modification to this peptide to make it weaker… remember, Omicron’s genetics are older than the stronger forms of SARS-CoV-2…
A form with a proline change (Omicron) was used to create immunity, then the stronger form hit those nations without immunity hard.
"The binding epitope on [SARS-CoV-2] S [Spike Protein] harbors a sequence motif unique to SARS-CoV-2 (not present in other SARS-related coronaviruses), which is highly similar in both sequence and structure to the bacterial superantigen staphylococcal enterotoxin B."
Of the many mutations in omicron the most interesting two are in the SEB domain.
Staphylococcus Enterotoxin B is a peptide that is classified as a bioweapon.
When ingested it creates symptoms very similar to COVID and it’s know to trigger cytokine storms
It’s well described in Cheng et al.
This known toxin was warp sped into spike only Vaccines.
SEB is directly adjacent to the FCS.
So this falsifies those charts which show Omicron originating from (Alpha) B.1.1.7 20B.
If I run a nucleotide by nucleotide most-like evaluation & then optimize a spanning tree from those relative 'alike' measures – the best solution which fits all the alike-strengths places Omicron before the B.1 sequence (Dec 24 2019).
Originally tweeted by Ethical Skeptic ☀ (@EthicalSkeptic) on December 6, 2021.
Originally tweeted by Ethical Skeptic ☀ (@EthicalSkeptic) on December 7, 2021.
Omicron and Alpha are cousins and share a genetic grandparent that existed before covid-19 was supposed to exist
This is probably a very big deal. Omicron or very similar could be the virus China released in 2017 to inoculate its population in preparation for the 2019 deliberate release of covid-19 in Wuhan. There is every reason to assume Western intelligence services knew that a novel respiratory virus was active in East Asia (centered around China) as early as 2017. In another Tweet TES says: “It was not as deadly during those two years [2017-2018]. And it was not hidden completely. Pig Ebola was a good cover story, but intel services hit onto something going on…” With this sort of assumption we can still consider that Western IC knew about the early virus and was well-prepared for the release of a stronger relative in 2019; and thus able to use covid-19 to seize even more power and wealth through our disastrous (for everyone else) “lockstep” covid responses. Other hypotheses are worth considering but this finding does strengthen the one that China released a milder inoculant virus in 2017 in preparation of the stronger covid-19 version. Their aim was most likely to unseat Donald Trump, an aim shared by Western IC and pursued accordingly. It would be reasonable to suspect collusion between China and West in this. ABN
This blows the doors off of any idea that Omicron emerged in the last 2 years
24% INDELS in the latest Omicron sample Sequence QLD-2568 – 2 Dec 2021, blows the doors off of any idea that this variant emerged in the last 2 years. INDELS, especially deletions, occur 8x less often than do in-clade substitutions.
Prohibitively strong as an argument.
Originally tweeted by Ethical Skeptic ☀ (@EthicalSkeptic) on December 4, 2021.
TES hypothesis: Covid began in 2017-18 in China and spread widely in that region plus parts of Africa with large Chinese presence
Covid may have been an accidental release of a bioweapon in 2017 in China or it may have been deliberate. In either case, Chinese and neighboring populations were largely inoculated (80%) against covid by this early release, while other parts of the world were less inoculated (30-50%) though they also had early exposure to the virus. This hypothesis is supported by “flu” data from 2017-2019 which shows a marked increase during those years in the green areas in the map above. ABN
South Korea excess deaths begin at the end of 2017 and segue cleanly into covid deaths in 2020, indicating high probability covid was active starting in China much earlier than 2019
South Korea is in their 4th year of something which is killing 65+ yr-olds faster. But I am 100% sure it's not Covid, because it can't be Covid, therefore it is not Covid.
Except that it is Covid after Feb 2020, but before that it is the well-known-but-mysterious 65sulp virus.
Originally tweeted by Ethical Skeptic ☀ (@EthicalSkeptic) on November 24, 2021.
The Ethical Skeptic has much more on this hypothesis here: China’s CCP Concealed SARS-CoV-2 Presence in China as Far Back as March 2018. A deeply sinister interpretation of this is China deliberately released covid or something similar in 2017 to inoculate its population for their planned 2019 release of covid19. A less sinister but also nasty interpretation is covid or something similar escaped from the Wuhan lab in 2017 and China allowed it to adventitiously inoculate its population, a circumstance they used in 2019 with full release of the bioweapon. Another possibility is they simply concealed the (accidental or deliberate) release of covid in 2017 and then did psyop theater on the world in 2020 causing everyone else to panic. A very important unanswered question is why has the West reacted to covid in such a stupid and self-destructive manner? Have we become weak, a hill of mediocrities that has grown rotten over many decades? Or is the West itself deeply sinister and is using covid to subdue the world by first enervating Western societies?
Corruption of Health Regulatory Agencies, Big Pharma, Government, and Media
This is a long page detailing what the title says with many links included.
The above is part of a larger site by mathematician Kathy Dopp found here: Compilation of Scientific and Medical Research, Data, and Reports.
These links are well-worth reviewing and saving as Dopp has collected a wealth of information. ABN
China’s CCP Concealed SARS-CoV-2 Presence in China as Far Back as March 2018
[Everything below this bracket is an excerpt from: China’s CCP Concealed SARS-CoV-2 Presence in China as Far Back as March 2018 ABN]
How do we infer that the Chinese Communist Party both reacted to and concealed the existence of SARS-CoV-2 as far back as March 2018? There is a critical path of query and dependency necessary and sufficient in prosecuting this problem from a deductive perspective. The questions which compose this pathway are exhibited in detail within this article. To summarize in advance, the critical arguments within this article involve eight key avenues of consilient inference:
- The mismatch in timing of Chinese SARS-CoV-2 B.1 and B.1.617.2 variant global rates of spread
- The conclusive evidence of both risk and culpability that SARS-CoV-2 was released (not zoonotic) from a Chinese BSL gain-of-function lab (during a U.S. ‘pause’ in such research)
- The elevated rates of unidentified ‘flu’ in longitude E65-180 nations during 2018/19, matching geographic pathogenic history
- The observed footprint of Covid prior immunity in longitude E65-180 nations (up until Delta variant prior natural-immunity breakthrough infections)
- The genetics of SARS-CoV-2 itself, which strongly suggest an inception case date of March 2018
- The CCP’s social response to an unknown, which resulted in unprecedented CO2 ppm reductions during 2018/19
- The CCP’s reactive social disruption patterns exhibited during 2019
- The CCP’s concerted efforts to conceal the critical databases, genomes, and lab production logs which pertain to SARS-CoV-2 origins.
Is vaccine efficacy a statistical illusion?
To evaluate the risk/benefit of a vaccine for treating a virus, such as covid-19, we can compare the all-cause mortality rate of vaccinated against unvaccinated people on a periodic basis. If the mortality rate for those vaccinated is consistently lower than that for unvaccinated then we might conclude the vaccine must be beneficial.
link
The author elegantly argues it is a statistical illusion. Well-worth reading and not hard to follow. ABN
2 Just Wear a Mask or You’ll Kill Grandma v2
To put it simply, the Biden administration plan would kill 5,248 children via Pfizer mRNA shots in order to save 45 children from dying of coronavirus
For every one child saved by the shot, another 117 would be killed by the shot.
If the FDA or CDC want to calculate a different NNTV [Number Needed To Vaccinate] (and explain how they arrived at that number) I’m all ears. But we all know that the FDA refused to calculate an NNTV not because they forgot, but because they knew the number was so high that it would destroy the case for mRNA vaccines in children this age. Your move CDC — your own Guidance document states that you must provide this number.
link
Sad to say, “evidence-based medicine” has morphed into “authoritarian medicine by unaccountable federal agency decree.” Killing small children to protect profits or vanity is as bad as it gets. This is a crime against humanity. No parent, doctor, teacher, or human being should allow this to happen. One of the most effective things we all can do is talk to people about this. Share these ideas with your grapevine. There is a vast oral culture in America to which we can all contribute. Nowadays, knowing what we know about information, it seems stimulating your grapevine works better than demonstrating, though that helps too. ABN
superspreader k = ‘ghost variable’
Vitamin D Deficiency and Covid-19
Vitamin D deficiency is so widespread, and so predictive of bad health outcomes, that it has itself been called a pandemic by many scientists, even in the title of at least one peer-reviewed scientific paper1. Others have argued that widespread vitamin D deficiency may be a symptom, not a cause, of ill-health2. In A Hunter-Gatherer’s Guide to the 21st Century, Bret Weinstein and I contend that the rush to supplement with vitamin D is yet another example of reductionist, metric-heavy thinking that passes for modern medicine and science (excerpted here). Our broader point stands, including that we moderns are making matters worse with many of our lifestyle choices, such as spending too much time inside, and slathering ourselves with sunscreen when we do venture out. But with particular regard to whether WEIRDos3 ought to supplement with vitamin D, we (both Bret and I) now believe that we were wrong.
link
Gummi Bear’s Anthropogenic Climate Change Deep Dive – Part 1
I’ve been curious about climate change ever since I first saw Al Gore’s “An Inconvenient Truth”. Back then I flirted with doing a deep dive but considered the topic way too complicated.
I finally decided to look into Anthropogenic Climate Change (ACC) because it’s now a driving force for policy and it will cost each of us a lot of money moving forward while fundamentally transforming our society.
link
Well-worth reading. ABN
American Buddhist Net 