Tag: war

Huge discovery on covid origin and spread

~ ABN ~ Leave a comment

Can anyone explain how all-cause mortality in the UK in April 2020 spiked at exactly the same time in every region when travel routes into the UK are overwhelmingly via the South East?

[If it was from an imported virus]

@boriquagato @EthicalSkeptic ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulati…

https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/datasets/weeklyprovisionalfiguresondeathsregisteredinenglandandwales

Travel is undertaken by only a fraction of the population at any one time, so the idea that “COVID” could be spread by travel as explanation of this sporadic pattern of worldwide spread seems unlikely.

It should spread locally – predominantly.

Yet there was basically no increase in all-cause mortality outside of Wuhan in mainland China for 2 years.

link to Threadreader unroll

link to original Twitter thread

This is truly a major finding. Be sure to look at the Twitter link just above as the author answers follow-up questions.

UPDATE: In addition to everything included in the above thread, what is also explained is the explosive spread of covid in China following their ending of zero-covid policies in November 2022. In previous posts I have commented on this not being possible through natural spread but only through deliberate release of the pathogen by drones and other means. This also implicates China in the origin and spread of early covid-19 as they are using the same MO.

Furthermore, this explains how both China and bad actors in the West may have or probably did conspire to do this in concert to: 1) remove Trump from office by creating new rules that permit election fraud; 2) aggrandize power through medical tyranny; and 3) relieve China of the psychological and economic burden of losing the trade war to Trump.

This also contributes to our understanding of a major anomaly in the Ukraine War, namely all NATO/neocon policies appear to have been designed not only to harm Russia but also to destroy Ukraine; to force civilians to flee to other countries while also killing as many military-age men as possible. What’s worse is NATO neocon policies also appear to be designed to provoke a nuclear war between Europe/USA and Russia—and this indicates the top designers of these policies are not Westerners. From that line of thought we can also theorize that the release of covid on the world may have been done at the top by non-Western actors, many of whom have infiltrated Western institutions and surely compromised many Westerners into cooperating.

We may also surmise that China has been infecting its own people for over two months: to remove the weak; to discipline those who remain; to destroy internal enemies in large numbers under cover of covid; to prepare not to take Taiwan but for WW3, which will begin in Europe-Russia, spread to include USA, and probably then include China. If any of this is true, the greatest danger before us is these bad actors must act—they must use nukes—before their plans are widely understood or understood by people in top positions who might be able to stop them, if there are any such people. ABN

Truth About Tanks: How NATO Lied Its Way to Disaster in Ukraine

~ ABN ~ 1 Comment

…The truth about tanks is that NATO and its allied nations are making Ukraine weaker, not stronger, by providing them with military systems that are overly complicated to operate, extraordinarily difficult to maintain, and impossible to survive unless employed in a cogent manner while supported by extensive combined arms partners.

The decision to provide Ukraine with Western main battle tanks is, literally, a suicide pact, something those who claim they are looking out for the best interests of Ukraine should consider before it is too late.

link

Again and again we see this same conclusion. NATO/US neocons are destroying Ukraine and needlessly killing Ukrainian young men while causing many millions of Ukrainian civilians to flee the nation. I do not believe this consistent outcome is due to incompetence. The top masters of the West are doing it deliberately. One explanation is someone wants the land. Another explanation is top masters of the West want nuclear war between Russia and NATO/USA, thus destroying all of them. Both possibilities indicate the top masters of the West are not Western. ABN

A Panicked Empire Tries to Make Russia an ‘offer It Can’t Refuse’

~ ABN ~ Leave a comment

Those behind the Throne are never more dangerous than when they have their backs against the wall.

Their power is slipping away, fast: Militarily, via NATO’s progressive humiliation in Ukraine; Financially, sooner rather than later, most of the Global South will want nothing to do with the currency of a bankrupt rogue giant; Politically, the global majority is taking decisive steps to stop obeying a rapacious, discredited, de facto minority.

So now those behind the Throne are plotting to at least try to stall the incoming disaster on the military front.

As confirmed by a high-level US establishment source, a new directive on NATO vs. Russia in Ukraine was relayed to US Secretary of State Antony Blinken. Blinken, in terms of actual power, is nothing but a messenger boy for the Straussian neocons and neoliberals who actually run US foreign policy.

…The Washington Post’s old school Moscow-based correspondent John Helmer has provided an important service, offering the full text of Blinken’s offer, of course extensively edited to include fantasist notions such as “US weapons help pulverize Putin’s invasion force” and a cringe-worthy explanation: “In other words, Russia should not be ready to rest, regroup and attack.”

link

Good article, well-worth reading. The US/NATO neocon failure in Ukraine illustrates the true nature of power in USA and the West. The gang in control does not know how to do anything except seize control of institutions and extract resources from them. They have no interest or any idea how to run a society so that it can flourish and remain prosperous. Ukraine today is a warning sign of what will be Europe and USA tomorrow. ABN

What is 5th Generation Warfare (5GW)? — James Corbett

~ ABN ~ Leave a comment

In a nutshell, Lind et al.’s thesis is that the “modern age” of warfare began with the Treaty of Westphalia in 1648, which, Lind opines, “gave the state a monopoly on war.” From that point on, modern warfare went through three generations, namely:

  • First-generation warfare: the tactics of line and column, developed in the era of the smoothbore musket;
  • Second-generation warfare: the tactics of indirect fire and mass movement, developed in the era of the rifled musket, breechloaders, barbed wire and the machine gun; and
  • Third-generation warfare: the tactics of nonlinear movement, including maneuver and infiltration, developed in response to the increase in battlefield firepower in WWI.

This, according to Lind and his co-authors, brought us to the late-20th century, when the nation-state began to lose its monopoly on war and military combat returned to a decentralized form. In this era—the era of fourth-generation warfare—the lines between “civilian” and “military” become blurred, armies tend to engage in counter-insurgency operations rather than military battles, and enemies are often motivated by ideology and religion, making psychological operations more important than ever.

But, some argue, we have now entered a new era of warfare, namely fifth-generation warfare. There is still much debate about what defines fifth-generation warfare, how we know we are engaged in it, or even if it exists at all (Lind, for one, rejects the concept). Various scholars have made their own attempts at defining fifth-generation warfare (5GW), like Dr. Waseem Ahmad Qureshi, who identifies it as “the battle of perceptions and information,” or Qiao Liang and Wang Xiangsui of the People’s Liberation Army, who write of the era of “Unrestricted Warfare” in which “a relative reduction in military violence” has led to “an increase in political, economic, and technological violence.”

If academic debates about the changing nature of warfare are your thing, then there’s plenty of reading for you to do on the subject, from The Handbook of 5GW: A Fifth Generation of War? to a slew of academic articles.

But for the purposes of this editorial, I’m not interested in that debate. In fact, we’re going to use a decidedly non-academic definition of fifth-generation warfare from an Al Jazeera article as our starting point: “The basic idea behind this term [fifth-generation warfare] is that in the modern era, wars are not fought by armies or guerrillas, but in the minds of common citizens.”

link

European historical border changes

~ ABN ~ Leave a comment

https://t.co/jpSiQxszkX

Among other things, this map shows why so many Eastern Europeans hate Russia. EE is basically descended from a freed slave population (serfs were emancipated in 1861). American and NATO neocons are exploiting this natural, though unfortunate, tendency in Ukraine and also in Poland and the Baltics. Many of the people living in those regions cannot be rational about Russia. The smartest thing all of them could do—all of Europe and all of Russia—is form a strong alliance. But the neocons do not want that because then they will lose control. ABN

Bioweapons at the root of Deep State Ukraine War

~ ABN ~ Leave a comment

 Now that I have everyone’s attention, allow me to address why US establishment politicians are sending tanks, jets, weapons, equipment, and $100+ billion to Ukraine.

It has nothing to do with Ukrainian citizens, and everything to do with Deep State assets/secrets in Ukraine.

2) Let’s go back to when and where it all began.

Flashback to 2005. Then Senator Obama and Senator Lugar visited former Soviet biological and chemical facilities in Ukraine, and established the US Deep State roots in Ukraine.

To “counter bioweapons”.

link

Demand for funeral facilities soars as the covid tsunami continues: How many Chinese have died from the virus?

~ ABN ~ Leave a comment

The number of dead from covid estimated in this video—up to 400 million—sounds incredible to me. This channel has no reason to lie about this, as far as I know. Conversely, official CCP covid death tallies sound just as incredible as so few are admitted. Is it even possible there are such high infection rates in China? What variant(s) are responsible? Why are these enormous numbers of infection and death not appearing in neighboring countries? As usual, there is no way to know for sure and plenty of reason speculate. Is Xi killing off his weakest people in preparation for war and hard times? Is he simply angry and deliberately spreading disease to save face for the failure of his zero-covid lockdown policies? Many in the West speculate that NATO and American neocons are preparing to attack China after they are finished with Russia. Xi must know this. Is he preparing for that? ABN