…Hypothetically, the plan could go something like this:
Release a virus (omicron) that is not particularly harmful in the short term, but spreads at a torrid pace all around the world, quickly creating endemicity among both humans and other mammals ensuring a reliable background reservoir. This virus leaves high levels of immunity in its wake.
Release a highly related virus (SARS-CoV-2) to the first that is somewhat harmful (primarily to those who are frail and go untreated), that will create a controlled panic.
Release a whizzy new gene therapy quasi-vaccine that paints the vaccinated as targets, drawing omicron to them while the unvaccinated get infected with SARS-CoV-2 more often.
Profit while weakening the enemies of authoritarian rule.
Understand, I have a wide set of levels of belief among the hypotheses presented so far, and with substantial error bars. There is room to steer, mold, or abandon them. But this last one should demonstrate the importance of the exploration. If there is a 1% chance that it is true, it is worth a great deal of attention. Government-corporate alliances should not have such powers. In fact, they should not have such opportunities, which is to say that we need to be certain that the curtain is always open enough to see to it that they cannot.link
The above is a small section from a longer piece on several major hypotheses about Omicron. I found this last one very chilling, though all hypotheses based on covid being a deliberately used bioweapon are chilling. Biowarfare is a KOBK move. It demands a KOBK response. The author, Mathew Crawford, just above says, “they should not have such opportunities, which is to say that we need to be certain that the curtain is always open enough to see to it that they cannot.” Unfortunately, I do not think this is possible. KOBK does not allow us that luxury. If we don’t do it our enemies will. There is no way to police a world where “the curtain is always open.” This is a primary reason why raw KOBK always prevails. ABN