The battle for the soul of the American Right is no longer fought in whispers. It has erupted into open warfare, with a taxpayer-funded Jewish organization demanding that Tucker Carlson be purged from conservative media and banished from President Donald Trump’s coalition entirely.
Days after the United States and Israel launched military operations against Iran in early March 2026, the Tikvah Fund released a podcast episode that laid bare the neoconservative establishment’s fury at populist opposition to the war. Former CIA Director and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo declared that conservatives must “wholeheartedly” reject Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens over their “nuttiness” and “anti-Semitism.” Pompeo insisted the “isolationist” wing of MAGA does not represent “the Trump that I worked for.”
Hudson Institute senior fellow Michael Doran went further. “I want to see Tucker Carlson dethroned,” Doran told Tikvah’s Jonathan Silver. “I would like to see him become an embarrassment to JD Vance. I would like to see Donald Trump attack him. Not just call him kooky from now and then but really make him off-limits to everybody in the administration.”
Chris Menahan of Information Liberation called attention to the podcast and how the Tikvah Fund is subsidized by gentile taxpayers: “Keep in mind as you watch that this is Trump admin/US taxpayer-funded cancel culture.”
…The frantic campaign to purge figures like Tucker Carlson from the American Right reveals the inherent fragility of Jewish influence. By attempting to use the coercive power of the state to suppress rising populist dissent, organized Jewish power inadvertently accelerates the very instability it fears. This escalation into state-sponsored censorship is a desperate bid to maintain control, yet it serves only to deepen the rift with the gentile population. As the ideology of the current establishment begins to turn against its own Jewish architects, this current conflict represents merely the latest chapter in an unavoidable and predictable civilization struggle between gentiles and Jews for civilizational primacy.
Jewish Supremacy, funded by USA taxpayers, out in the open attacking free speech and entirely reasonable dissention from their arrogant and groundless supremacist views. JS caused this wanton war. To what extent Trump agrees with them or is forced to play along or is even a crypto Jew or JS himself, is hard to tell. One thing is certain, this is a terrible way to run a country. As Trump said they other day, ‘it is a habit’ of USA to do JS bidding. ABN
This is profoundly true. The Western failure to understand human savagery and differences in ethics and morality is a root cause of the downfall of the West. At one end of the spectrum of savagery are deranged savages as described above. At the other end are deranged savages who act in groups. The most sophisticated and dangerous group at this end of the spectrum is Jewish Supremists who are very clearly pursuing a strategy of lethal parasitism against the West and also annihilation of all of their perceived enemies, which will include the West once we have helped them destroy their neighbors. Their intransigent belief in their own superiority, coupled with what appears to be gene-based self-deception, has given rise to their religious fantasy of world domination. The sheer craziness of their ideas shows that group dynamics do not need to be based on reality; indeed, group bonds can be even stronger when they are based on delusion. I mention Jewish Supremacy in this context because they are very clearly the major proponents of mass immigration invasion of the West. This should be obvious to all thoughtful Westerners by now. They also very clearly have total control over the Trump administration, as they did over Biden, Obama, Bush, and Clinton… ABN
The letter below (click image for larger version):
Robert Trivers was born in Washington DC, son of Howard Trivers, a Jewish-American academic and US State Department diplomat who played a key role in the denazification of post-war Germany
Trivers said of Epstein’s assaults on underage girls “by the time they’re 14 or 15 they’re like grown women were 60 years ago, so I don’t see the acts as so heinous.” Reuters reported that Trivers said Epstein “is a person of integrity who should be given credit for serving time in prison and for settling civil lawsuits brought by women who said they were abused”
Trivers, has been open about his diagnosis of bipolar disorder, which was first diagnosed when he had a manic episode at Harvard, requiring hospitalisation for several months and treatment with first generation antipsychotics. During his recovery he developed an interest in psychology and social biology
__________
Epstein’s main crime was the blackmail and bribery operation he ran, with little doubt, for a gang of Jewish Supremists. This is not to downplay the traumas suffered by Epstein’s victims but to emphasize that even in their abject degradation they were but tools, toys for Epstein’s larger design — total control of USA and the West. Epstein alone is not responsible for having turned USA into a captured nation, but he was a significant participant in that effort and should stand as a symbol for what was done and still is being done and by whom to USA and the West. ABN
A regime is not upheld by abstractions, but by men—by their capacities, their instincts, and their loyalties. Every political order is biopolitical. It rests on who is born, who holds power, and who is cast out.
Hierarchy is the principle by which men are arranged according to their natural differences. Order is the cohesion and stability that arise when those differences are rightly understood and affirmed. Both emerge from the unequal distribution of traits among men: differences in character, in foresight, and in the will to lead or the willingness to follow.
Institutions do not endure through ideals alone. They endure through the strength, discipline, and continuity of a people—through the cooperation of the living and the faithful transmission of order across generations. Each man fulfills the station assigned to him. As the Roman poet Horace observed, “Content with his own place, he does not strive to rise above his rank.” This is the foundation of every stable order.
When these biological foundations are subverted—when the weak and unfit are gathered into a collective and their infirmity is transmuted into political force—politics does not vanish. It degenerates. It no longer serves truth, justice, or excellence, but becomes a mechanism of control. The regime still demands obedience, but not from men of worth. It secures it through dependence, and sustains it by elevating the weak over the strong, the base over the noble.
This is the logic of Bioleninism.
Coined by the writer “Spandrell,” Bioleninism describes a strategy of rule that emerges in times of civilizational decline. Unable to sustain themselves through the loyalty of the competent and independent, regimes in decay assemble a new ruling coalition from the biologically—and therefore, often socially—unfit. These are not men who ascend through merit, but men whose status, and in many cases their very existence, depends entirely on the system. Their loyalty is secured through dependency. Their resentment is weaponized against those more capable.
This is not a new phenomenon. Lenin perfected it in revolutionary Russia. He recruited from the embittered margins—what Dr. Edward Dutton calls the “spiteful mutants”: ethnic outsiders, failed intellectuals, radical ideologues, and social deviants. These were not men with a stake in the old order, nor any place in a just or natural hierarchy. But for a regime built upon destruction, they were the perfect instruments. Their failure bound them in loyalty. Their hatred made them merciless.
Bioleninism adapts this same logic to the postmodern West. It extends beyond socioeconomic class to encompass the full spectrum of biological dysfunction. Its favored instruments are the neurotic, the perverse, the embittered, and the malformed. The more broken the individual, the more easily he is controlled. The less capable he is of surviving on merit, the more tightly he clings to the regime that elevates him. In this perverse selection process, the ugliness of ineptitude and failure becomes power. Dependence is transfigured into virtue.
This is not a regime designed to elevate the noble or reward the capable. It exists to entrench itself through the destruction of those who might transcend it. What it cannot corrupt, it casts out. What it cannot cast out, it slanders or crushes. Its war on merit is not accidental but essential, for excellence threatens its command. Competence defies control. Beauty reveals the sublime indifference of nature, where nothing is owed and everything must be earned. Normalcy resists authoritarian domination, for it thrives on proportion and restraint. And so inversion becomes the law. The strong are treated as a threat, the virtuous as a danger, the noble as criminal. In their place rise the bitter, the weak, and the grotesque—men who could never have built a civilization, but who will burn one down to preserve their power.
The result is a system that no longer aspires to greatness, but to obedience. Its rulers do not seek honor, but control. They govern not through excellence, but through fear, distortion, and manufactured dependency. Their stability rests on the loyalty of those who would hold no place in any just or well-ordered world.
Bioleninism is not a temporary error, but the death knell of a collapsing system. It does not merely manage decline, as the familiar idiom suggests, but voraciously feeds upon it. And unless it is utterly annihilated—without hesitation and without mercy—all that is noble will be shattered and all that is beautiful will lie in ruin.
Victory does not demand cruelty, but it does demand resolve, the kind that does not turn away from necessity. It calls for fidelity to nature, the courage to name things as they are, and the unbending will to build again. Like all parasitic systems, Bioleninism is brittle. Its strength lies not in might, but in submission. As Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn warned, “Let the lie come into the world, let it even triumph. But not through me.” If enough men refuse to live by lies, the mask cracks, the spell breaks, and the whole decrepit order begins to fall.
He gets it mostly right for the present and recent past but does not understand or acknowledge that the Arenda system in Poland and Eastern Europe (Poland was a much larger political region centuries ago) is what gave rise to the perception of Jews as despicable goblins.
The Arenda system was a leasing system which rewarded Jewish parasitism. The Polish, and other, ‘nobles’ who leased sale of liquor, tax collecting and other rights to Jews were every bit as much parasites as the Jews.
Jews flocked to Eastern Europe to cash in on the parasitic privileges they enjoyed under the Arenda System.
During those years, Jews experienced the largest population growth in world history, which is an indubitable indicator of wealth and an easy life.
At the same time, the peasantry they exploited were treated as slaves, because they were slaves.
The Khmelnytsky Uprising1, also known as the Cossack–Polish War, Khmelnytsky insurrection, Cossack Revolution, or, in Ukraine, as the National Liberation War was a response to many years of savage exploitation under the Arenda System.
The Uprising was directed at the entire Polish-Lithuanian ‘nobility’, Poles in general, Roman Catholics and Jews.
All of them were rightly perceived as parasitic oppressors. All of them were hated. And Jews who interfaced most closely with their peasant-slaves were perceived as greedy goblins. ABN
__________
This rabbi does history better, but likewise leaves out the Arenda System, which taught Jews how to control and exploit large numbers of slaves, entire populations, a skill they are still practicing today to the detriment of all others. ABN
Khmelnytsky Uprising The Khmelnytsky Uprising was a major rebellion that took place between 1648 and 1657 in the eastern territories of the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth, led by Cossack Hetman Bohdan Khmelnytsky. It began as a revolt by the Zaporozhian Cossacks but quickly evolved into a broader war of liberation involving the local Ukrainian peasantry and initially allied with the Crimean Tatars. The uprising was fueled by social discontent, religious tensions, and resentment toward Polish Catholic nobility (szlachta), particularly due to the imposition of Catholicism, Polonization, and the use of Jewish leaseholders (arendators) to manage estates. The rebellion resulted in significant violence and mass atrocities, especially against Polish and Jewish communities, with estimates of hundreds of thousands of casualties during the uprising and subsequent conflicts. The Cossacks targeted Roman Catholic and Ruthenian Uniate clergy, as well as Jewish populations, who were seen as representatives of the oppressive Polish administration. The event is known in Jewish history as one of the worst national catastrophes since the destruction of Solomon’s Temple. The uprising led to the creation of the Cossack Hetmanate, a new political entity in Ukraine, and marked the end of Polish Catholic noble control over Ukrainian Orthodox populations In 1654, the Pereiaslav Agreement was signed, leading to the incorporation of eastern Ukraine into the Tsardom of Russia, a development that had lasting implications for Ukraine’s relationship with both Poland and Russia. The conflict also contributed to the decline of the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth, a period known in Polish history as “The Deluge”. The uprising is considered a pivotal moment in Ukrainian history, symbolizing a national liberation struggle and influencing modern Ukrainian identity, though it remains a complex and contested event due to its violent legacy ↩︎
I so clearly remember having a conversation with Charlie about what was happening in Gaza which he obviously felt was morally wrong but also believed he could somehow broker peace between differing perspectives.
I told him to forget the politics— there are basic rules of the jungle; people that will mass murder innocent children and lie about it will murder us too. There’s no allying halfway with sheer evil.
It’s amazing that people don’t realize this and think America will somehow be kept safe if it keeps cheering on Israeli war crimes all around the world. As though that chicken won’t come home to roost.
Of course it will. As they have done many times in the past, Israel will murder Americans and our offspring too. We are dealing with a biblically murderous tribe that are not in any manner or form guided by Judaic belief.
Be sure to cheer this worldwide neocon shit on at your own peril.
American Buddhist Net 