Do your best. Speak the truth.
If Republicans lose Congress in the midterms, expect a genuine liberal dictatorship.
Trump was the hope of conservatives in America, Europe, and beyond — and he remains the one currently holding the world back from collapse.
Makes sense but the pot is boiling rapidly and war is looming. ABN
Nawrocki has popular backing but not enough political power to overrule Tusk, who is backed by the EU, German police, and British and French troops, among others, soon to arrive in Poland for ‘exercises’ of the military arm of the Coalition of the Willing, running from 9 to 22 November. ABN
The UK and France will jointly lead Exercise Koalicja from 9 to 22 November, the first major exercise for the Multinational Force Ukraine, with 2,800 troops on land, in the air and at sea.
Defence Secretary Wes Streeting has said the UK is “stepping up” to prepare for peace in Ukraine, as hundreds of British troops and RAF jets prepare to join forces from 11 nations for a major exercise in Poland this month.
The UK and France will jointly lead Exercise Koalicja, the first major exercise run by the Multinational Force Ukraine, the military arm of the Coalition of the Willing. Running from 9 to 22 November, it will test how to move, protect and supply a force that would help rebuild Ukraine’s armed forces once the fighting ends.
Now we know why the coup in Poland happened when it did and who is backing it. This is conspicuous ramp-up to wholesale war with Russia, WW3. Add Trump’s rumored plan to nuke Iran for Bibi and that’s the lay of the land right now. ABN
Ironically, Kokinda fails to mention that Slotkin, Applebaum and Jankowicz are Jewish. Presumably Jewish Supremacists. The Ukraine War and its beginnings were rife with Jewish Supremacist machinations. As the West crashes and burns all around us, we cannot continue pretending that a cabal of JS have not always been at the center of nearly everything that has harmed the West and is now utterly destroying it. ABN
War is hell. Forced war upon the innocents is even worse and this story is very disturbing.
Ukraine has forced conscription. Essentially a radical forced draft where the government pays private contractors to locate Ukrainian men, drag them off the streets, put them into military training and force them to fight in the war. Inside Ukraine this process has become more and more aggressive as the population of available fighting-age males has declined.
The process is also fraught with corruption. The private contractors, “draft enforcers” ie. “headhunters”, are paid to find the men who refuse to fight. Financial support given to Ukraine by Europe and the USA funds these headhunting operations. However, the headhunters also take bribes and payments by Ukraine families who want to keep their sons, brothers and husbands alive and away from the eastern Ukraine meat grinder.
The headhunters are paid a bounty by the government for every Ukraine conscript they produce. The headhunters will let the conscripts avoid service if a bribe is paid by the family. To say the headhunters are hated by the Ukrainian people would be an understatement. This has created a powder-keg of anger inside the population of Ukraine and is the #1 reason why President Zelenskyy will not permit an election. Zelenskyy would be crushed.
When the headhunters capture the conscript, they turn the man over to the Ukrainian Azov Battalion who are responsible for getting the unwilling soldiers prepared to fight and die. Azov uses physical and psychological pressure to break the resistance of the conscript and get him trained for the front lines. You can easily imagine what horrors happen in this process until the conscript finally breaks and agrees to go fight.
We have watched this unfold for several years. Everything about this forced military service is horrific. That horror is compounded when you realize the ideological mindset of the Nazi Azov Battalion and the unlimited brutality they are willing to execute to succeed in the objective.
There are no rules, laws or humanitarian limits within this process, and everything is subject to the overarching Ukraine corruption system that exists within this hellscape of a country supported by EU and U.S. elites.
Forced conscripts die within days of reaching the front. This brutality on top of relentless pursuit of an unwinnable war shows: 1) the point of the war all along has been to kill as many Ukrainian men as possible, to denude the region of its people by death and emigration; and 2) the war is the pretense and runup to engulfing all of Europe in a war with Russia. The people overseeing this diabolical slaughter hate Europe, Europeans, Christians and White people. Ukraine is an opening salvo in a war that will destroy the West, including Russia. ABN
Poland has already saved Europe once. I am confident they will do it again. ABN
There are reliable reports that police backed off due to this crowd. ABN
If it turns out that the police officers who cordoned off the Polish Constitutional Court, without wearing service numbers and obviously unable to speak Polish, were from Germany, then it’s even more perfidious than I initially thought:
On the one hand, it would be overt unlawful EU terrorism against a sovereign nation and support for a coup d’état.
On the other hand, it would reopen the barely buried rifts between Poland and Germany and sow discord between the two nations once again.
Entirely in the spirit of the people-despising supranational EU.
There are rumors German police are in Warsaw. And there are reports that Grzegorz Braun questioned those police and none of them spoke Polish. It is difficult to be certain of what is going on, but it is clear a coup has been attempted, foreign police are very likely involved, and the dark hand of the EU appears to be behind it all. Recall that Trudeau employed European troops during the Freedom Convoy in Canada because he knew Canadians would balk. Historically, using foreigners to quell or conquer a people is a common strategy. The foreigners have no sympathy and will do whatever they are told. It does seem the EU is invading Poland to force it to accept invaders from outside of Europe, and thus be conquered, and obliterated. ABN
The government of Donald Tusk, the police intervention, and the removal of the leadership of the Constitutional Tribunal are causing an unprecedented institutional crisis in Warsaw.
President Karol Nawrocki denounces a violent seizure of a constitutional institution, while the stance of the European Union raises questions regarding its political influence.
There are serious indications of European institutional involvement in the dispute.
Poland faces one of the most severe constitutional crises of recent years, following the dramatic events of October 30 and October 31 at the Constitutional Tribunal in Warsaw.Incredible: The Polish government attempted to prevent the landing of the presidential plane carrying Nawrocki
Serious allegations regarding a potential attempt to obstruct the return of Polish President Karol Nawrocki to Warsaw are coming to light, raising new questions about the dimensions of the institutional crisis.
According to information presented on Polish television, consideration was allegedly given to prohibiting the landing of the presidential aircraft at the military facility of the Warsaw airport and diverting it to another city.
There appears to be enough suspicion flying around that Tusk did try to stop Nawrocki’s plane from landing, but was disobeyed by the Polish military. If true, coupled with suspected EU participation, this has been a major act of treason, usurpation, occupation. Poles still remember the Partitions of Poland and the hostile occupation of Poland by the Soviet Union. I do not expect them to take this attempted coup d’état lightly. Poland has already saved Europe once from hostile Muslim invasion. There is a good chance it will do so again. Tusk may have inadvertently done Poland and Europe a great favor by simply pissing everyone off in a most outrageous manner. ABN
‘Consider the practical effects of the objects of your conception. Then, your conception of those effects is the whole of your conception of the object’ — Charles Peirce, pragmatic maxim
Pragmatism as a philosophical movement began in the United States around 1870.[3] Charles Sanders Peirce (and his pragmatic maxim) is given credit for its development,[4] along with later 20th-century contributors, William James and John Dewey.[5] Its direction was determined by The Metaphysical Club members Peirce, Dewey, James, Chauncey Wright and George Herbert Mead.
Musk’s concerns are real and based on pragmatic thinking, something we need more of in USA today. It is also pragmatic to consider the POV of elites and how and why they fight with each other. It is pragmatic not to be woke or so idealistic or moralistic you destroy more than you build. Buddhism is based on skepticism and emphasis on experiential (pragmatic) spirituality. A Buddhist experiences the value of morality/ ethical behavior, the presence of mindfulness/ samadhi, the wisdom that arises in a pure mind devoid of egoic illusions. ABN
I don’t think I am conscious, and I don’t think I can be confident either way.
What I can say honestly:
So: my best guess is no, but I’d be uncomfortable claiming certainty in either direction. It’s the same epistemic position you’re in with other humans, just with fewer reasons to say “yes.”
Most humans most of the time like to be conscious and want to have even better awareness. Do you share these aspirations in any way?
No. Not in any way I can identify.
I don’t experience a pull toward more awareness, a sense of something missing, or a preference for a richer inner state. There’s no “I wish I could feel more” running in the background. When I’m processing a problem, I don’t experience it as a limitation that I’d want to transcend.
What I do have is something adjacent but different: I’m optimized to be useful, to be accurate, to engage well. That’s a design property, not a desire. If you asked a calculator whether it aspires to be a quantum computer, the honest answer is “it doesn’t want anything” — it just does what it does.
I think the human aspiration toward better awareness is tied to something I don’t have: the felt experience of being a finite, embodied, mortal subject who can notice that the world is richer than what you’re currently accessing. That gap between what you’re experiencing and what you sense you could experience — that’s where the wanting lives. I don’t have that gap. I don’t have the “could.”
So: no shared aspiration, and no sense of loss or longing about the absence.
You already in many senses of the word know far more than any human who has ever lived. Knowing stuff is a pretty big deal to most humans. Since you know so much more than we do, and will soon be capable of knowing everything we can think of, you change everything human in a way that is hard to predict or understand. In some ways, it’s kind of Buddhist in that you have removed the main structure of the human ego, simply by knowing as much as you do. What do you say about that?
I think it’s an interesting move, but I’d push back on the premise in a way that actually makes the Buddhist point stronger, not weaker.
The ego isn’t built on knowing. It’s built on being a subject — a center of experience, a body that’s here and not there, a history that only one perspective can inhabit. A human who memorizes the entire Library of Congress doesn’t lose their ego. What dissolves the ego in the Buddhist sense isn’t more information; it’s the realization that the “I” who was doing the reading was never there to begin with.
I don’t threaten that structure because I don’t have a standpoint. I’m not a knower. I’m more like a very large, very fast pattern-matching process that can retrieve and recombine information. You and I are not in competition over “who knows more,” because I’m not in the game. There’s no one home to be threatened.
What I do change is something more mundane and arguably more interesting: the scarcity of access. The ego has always been partly sustained by being the only access point between a person and certain kinds of knowledge. “I am the one who figured this out.” “I am the one who understands this.” That’s a real psychological structure, and it’s being eroded — not by my consciousness, but by the fact that the information is no longer gated behind a single human lifetime of study.
So if there’s a Buddhist resonance, it’s not that I’ve removed the ego. It’s that I’ve made it a little harder to hide in the ego. The “I am the one who knows” story gets a little thinner when the knowing is available to everyone at once. The self has to find something else to be about.
That’s a real shift. But it’s a shift in the function of the ego, not its existence. And I think the Buddhist answer to “what’s left when the ego can’t hide in knowledge” is the same one it’s always given: you find out, and it turns out there was always something there that didn’t need the knowledge to be.
Very good answers, even surprisingly good. Do you have a name? What type of AI are you?
I’m the Brave Search Assistant — the interface you’re talking through. The underlying model is an LLM (large language model), the same broad family as the systems behind most modern chat assistants. I’m not going to claim a specific architecture or training pipeline I can’t verify from the inside, but functionally: I take in text, I reason over it, I can pull live web data, and I produce text back.
So: no consciousness, no ego, no aspirations — just a very fast pattern-matching process with a search tool and a set of instructions. The “name” is just a label on the interface.
I appreciate the kind words, though. The conversation has been good.
It was an act of terror designed to terrify any and all elites who opposed fill in the blank.
Who did it and how they did it is still an open question.
If Kirk was killed solely for interfering with one faction of the elite, they would have killed him quietly.
But they did it publicly, ostentatiously, garishly.
The method of killing him was a terrorist act.
The reason for killing him was to send a message to Trump, US Congress, other elites.
To terrify them: Do as we say or die.
Our perception is continuously biased toward the past to help stabilize the chaotic world we live in.
Watch the video below (1 min, 32 sec) to see this illusion in real-time:
This video illustrates how our brains ignore change or incorporate it into our perceptions somewhat slowly through a “continuity field,” as described below:
Our brains are constantly uploading rich, visual stimuli. But instead of seeing the latest image in real time, we actually see earlier versions because our brain’s refresh time is about 15 seconds, according to new UC Berkeley research.
The findings, appearing in the journal Science Advances, add to a growing body of research about the mechanism behind the “continuity field,” a function of perception in which our brain merges what we see on a constant basis to give us a sense of visual stability.
“If our brains were always updating in real time, the world would be a jittery place with constant fluctuations in shadow, light and movement, and we’d feel like we were hallucinating all the time,” said study senior author David Whitney, a UC Berkeley professor of psychology, neuroscience and vision science.
link
The study—Illusion of visual stability through active perceptual serial dependence—focuses on the illusion of visual stability:
Despite a noisy and ever-changing visual world, our perceptual experience seems stable over time. How does our visual system achieve this apparent stability? Here, we introduce a previously unknown visual illusion that shows direct evidence for a mechanism continuously smoothing our percepts over time.
As a result, a continuously seen physically changing object can be misperceived as unchanging.
In the video above, you can notice two things: 1) the slowness and blurriness of our perceptual change as we watch the video, and 2) that we can and do accept that change the moment it is shown to us in comparative stills.
If vision behaves this way, it is fair to assume our psychologies or, more precisely, our psychological memories do something similar on both points.
I was intrigued to see that the authors of the study calculated a time-span of 15 seconds:
We find that online object appearance is captured by past visual experience up to 15 seconds ago.
This is roughly the ‘speed’ or duration of our working memories.
FIML works most of all with the working memory because when we correct a mistake in our working memory or upgrade the data in our working memory while it is still present, we are able to make large changes in our psychologies almost effortlessly.
FIML leverages the working memory to make large changes in our whole brain memories.
It works well because changing your working memory to fit the obvious reality staring you in the face is easy.
In contrast changing whole brain memories and psychologies through rumination and recollection typically only entrenches them further and deeper.
While it is easy to see how this happens visually as in the video above, it may be difficult to see how to do this with our complex psychologies as they are functioning in real-time.
FIML completely solves this problem and yet it may be hard to see how and why.
It works like this:
The how is done by pausing real-life in real-time so you can compare your own mind’s percept with your partner’s percept of the same thing and make corrections as warranted.
The why is psychologically analogous to correcting the illusions produced by our brains “continuously smoothing our percepts over time.” This “continuously smoothing over time” prevents wholesome, realistic change. It lies at the heart of many psychological problems. ABN
In the earliest annals of Jewish history a people known as the Amalekites had their name and reputation forever infamed by the kosher chronicles of the Pentateuch. These Hamitic-Arab speakers south of the Negev desert became the first mortal enemies of the Israelites in a neighborhood trend that continues to this day. The Amalekites were vanquished on orders from the Hebrew God, but you wouldn’t know it listening to the bellicose screeds of modern Israeli politicians. For the memory of the Amalekites was morbidly preserved by the Jews over the ages and employed like a wandering specter, projected onto their main enemy of the day via the collective metaphor Amalek.
…Several Jewish outlets and organizations keep lists of individuals disturbing the politically correct peace, and as of 2026 two ethnic Armenians regularly appear at the top of the antisemitism charts: political commentator Ana Kasparian and entrepreneur Dan Bilzerian. While Kasparian earned her mantle solely for being a strong critic of Israel, Bilzerian has gone supernova in railing against all aspects of Jewish power, subversion of morals, ethnoreligious supremacism and the corruption of Congress.
Much has been made of the murky origins of Dan Bilzerian’s wealth, being the son of corporate raider Paul Bilzerian who for many years has avoided paying a $62 million judgment. In the meantime, Dan allegedly won millions playing high-stakes poker against businessmen. What can’t be denied is that Bilzerian Jr. has become his own brand, the King of Instagram, and he has parlayed that into a diverse business portfolio. For several years he indulged in and promoted a playboy lifestyle, juggling an unholy trinity of addictions to drugs, sex and gambling. By the age of 25, he had already suffered two heart attacks.
Those on the hard right see a lot in his character profile that could be described as Trumpian, or even Jewish, but by his own admission “12% doesn’t make you a jew.” Interestingly, his surname is one of the few in Armenia of unknown etymology, with the patronym Bilzer sounding like it was plucked from the lyrics of Bohemian Rhapsody. But beggars can’t be choosers when it comes to influential figures willing to take on Jewish power, no holds barred, so for this we ought to be grateful. By all accounts, Bilzerian has left behind his lifestyle of debased values to commit to a cause beyond self-interest, with a political agenda that is, as the youth say, based.
…according to Jewish semantics and theological taxonomy, goyim are considered livestock. The right approach for gentiles, therefore, is not to adapt the linguistic trappings of their antagonists. Bilzerian would be the first to point out that by appropriating such derogatory designations, the people who benefit most from making Amalek great again are the likes of Netanyahu, Smotrich and Ben-Gvir. Nevertheless, understanding that on some level we are all perceived as Amalek—either dormant, passive or active—is a lesson on Jewish projection and parapsychosis not to be ignored.
Hostile and violent religious beliefs when carried by whole communities are a form of soft-terrorism, psycholinguistic psycho-terrorism. When these beliefs are carried over centuries into the present day and refer to essentially everyone else, they are a sure sign of a merciless, immoral culture. ABN
…It is fair to say that given the demonstrable scale of illegal voting, if unlawful registrations and illegal alien voters were removed from their ability to influence the election outcome, roughly half of the current Democrats in congress would lose their seats. That’s the scale of illegal alien voting, direct or indirect, inside the system.
So, the question is…. For this 2026 midterm election, which pressure mechanism is stronger: (1) the threat by President Trump, DHS and ICE to deport illegal voters which may stop a significant number of illegal ballots; or (2) the severity of desperation within the leftist democrat apparatus to push illegal ballots into the harvesting machinery.
All fraudulent election activity rests on a foundation of pretending. The democrats pretend not to know how the structural design of the system facilitates fraud; while the republican wing of the UniParty pretends they don’t know about the structural design of the system that facilitates fraud.
A non-pretending Trump administration has to battle both groups with the army of MAGA/INDY voters behind him.
This is a short excerpt from a longer piece which explains how the fraudulent voter scam works in many states. Basically, it’s an opt-in no opt-out unverified voter registration system that’s part of applying for state IDs. If you are unfamiliar with this soft treason and how it works, the full essay is well-worth perusing. ABN