Tag: analysis

Charlie’s Final Ride To The Hospital Isn’t Adding Up. Neither Is Daily Wire’s Accounting. | Ep 355

~ ABN ~ Leave a comment

__________

The first segment of this episode has a very interesting analysis of what happened in the SUV during the high-speed drive to the hospital. And what happened once they got there. ABN

UPDATE: One very important detail of the Kirk story after he was killed is what was the condition of his chest. If he was killed by a PETN shaped charge, there should be a severe wound in his chest. I am not well-versed in this area but believe a PETN shaped charge fires a burst of gas at high-velocity or a hyper-velocity jet of solid and molten metal particles. This is directed in pinpointed high-pressure stream that will penetrate a human body and look like a bullet hole. We know Charlie’s shirt was removed and many must have seen his chest. This definitely needs to be cleared up. A wound like that in his chest would also explain the lack of video evidence of Kirk arriving at the hospital or while he was in it. I wonder what his undertaker would say. I wonder who his undertaker was. Also, is there no one who attended to Charlie at the hospital who is willing to talk? ABN

The exact model RØDE microphone face shattered and placed on automobile carpet next to the SUV photos…. — Jon Bray

~ ABN ~ Leave a comment

link

__________

This comparison is evidence that Charlie Kirk was killed by an exploding mic he wore on his shirt. To add to this, the mic was placed inside his shirt when normally they are placed outside the shirt for obvious reasons. For more on this, see this link. The SUV photo is from the SUV that took Kirk from the murder scene to the hospital. Use of an SUV, due to the absence of an ambulance which was the norm at his events, is itself suspicious. He was carried like a sack of potatoes by his ‘security’ staff. What’s worse is the SUV was cleaned and sold at auction very soon after Kirk’s assassination. In the real world, that SUV would have been preserved as evidence. These are but a few of dozens of suspicious anomalies surrounding almost every detail of the crime. The Kirk case is important in itself and also because 50 million Evangelical Christians are being affected by his murder exposing the fraudulence of Christian ‘dispensationalism’ and the ostentatious violence of those who have promoted it. ABN

Excess heat in the abyssal ocean explains warming oceans — The Ethical Skeptic

~ ABN ~ Leave a comment

We are at 151 Deep Argo Float cycles1 for the last 30 days of 2026, and guess what is showing up consistently with this hot ocean we have in June of 2026?

Abyssal oceanic heat. Key inferences:

  1. The abyssal ocean is not isothermal as has been assumed by climate science.
  2. There appears to be a broad and pervasive thermal curvature below the deep ocean temperature minimum.
  3. The bottomward warming extends over 1000–2000 meters, far thicker than a conductive or advective boundary layer (no thermocline in the taper) could create (not the result of an overturning current).
  4. The excess abyssal heat content is real and measurable. Unlike the ocean’s surface, maintaining this abyssal heat content requires a continual balance between energy losses and replenishment. The critical path question is: what is the source of the replenishing energy flux?
  5. The layer contains substantial heat content (J/m²).

Climate science missed this – badly…
ECDO Theory caught it.

link

  1. Deep Argo floats operate on a nominal 10-day cycle, though some configurations use 15-day cycles to accommodate deeper profiling depths. 
     During each cycle, the floats cycle between the ocean surface and the seafloor, typically reaching depths of 4000 meters or 6000 meters depending on the specific model (such as Deep SOLO, Deep Arvor, or Deep NINJA). 
    The cycle consists of the following key phases:
    Descent: The float sinks to its target profile depth (4000 m or 6000 m), a process that can take up to 13 hours for deep models. 
    Parking/Drifting: Upon reaching the bottom or target depth, the float pauses or drifts for a set duration before beginning its ascent. 
    Ascent and Profiling: The float rises to the surface, a process taking approximately 17 hours from 5000 meters, continuously measuring temperature, salinity, and pressure. 
    Transmission: Once at the surface, the float transmits data via satellite (often Iridium) and receives new mission instructions before sinking back to its drift depth to repeat the process. 
    While Core Argo floats sample the upper 2000 meters, Deep Argo floats are designed to sample the full ocean volume, providing critical data for understanding deep-ocean heat content and circulation.  ↩︎

__________

My understanding is the heat coming from deep in the earth also heats land masses, but more slowly and harder to measure. It is obvious that ocean heat will heat the atmosphere far more than the atmosphere will heat the ocean. Also, I love Ethical Skeptic but he can a pain in the ass because his writing is filled with abstruse phraseology and technical terms. It requires close attention, which is usually worth the effort. BUT when he has written on a topic I know very well AND based his entire analysis on a flatulent Wikipedia entry AND THEN is rude in response to my horror at his conclusions… well, he did eventually remove the piece. And, like I said, I do greatly appreciate his work. (footnote above is mine) ABN

Why did Wittgenstein dislike Schopenhauer?

~ ABN ~ Leave a comment

Wittgenstein was very much taken by Schopenhauer in his youth, and we know he read him intensely. Particularly around the age when he was finishing school and beginning his later studies in Berlin. That feeling towards Schopenhauer changed over time, though. In Wittgenstein’s private notes, later published in Culture and Value:

“One could call Schopenhauer an altogether crude mind. I.e., he does have refinement, but at a certain level this suddenly comes to an end & he is as crude as the crudest. Where real depth starts, his finishes. One might say of Schopenhauer: he never takes stock of himself.”

So what happened? At 16, Wittgenstein read The World as Will and Representation and adopted Schopenhauer’s transcendental idealism (the idea that the world is fundamentally “my representation”). The entire concluding section of the Tractatus – where Wittgenstein talks about the “solipsistic I,” the world as a limited whole, and ethics/aesthetics being one – is essentially Schopenhauer translated into the language of mathematical logic.

We know, though from his notebooks and conversations with others that his view of Schopenhauer then shifts. He finds him too “glib”, too clean, things too clear and neat and, in some sense, easy. Schopenhauer, for example, solves the mystery of the universe by labelling the underlying force of reality “The Will.” To the (later) Wittgenstein, this felt like a cheap linguistic trick. It didn’t solve the philosophical knot in any way, it just gave the knot a mysterious, evocative name.

Also, compared particularly to Frege and Russell (who taught Wittgenstein in different contexts), Schopenhauer began to look like a sweeping, romantic prose-stylist rather than a rigorous thinker. Wittgenstein remarked that when he read Schopenhauer, he could “see to the bottom very easily” and to Wittgenstein, if a philosophical problem looks easy to solve, you probably haven’t actually understood its depth.

Wittgenstein was a choosy person, with his God-complex, and saw himself as unique figure.

Wittgenstein was certainly a choosy person, in many ways, but he was not someone with a God complex. Wittgenstein’s own journals abound with incredibly intense self-criticism, self-roasting, and self-recrimination. He held himself to incredibly high standards, which he generally thought he fell short of. He also held others to very high standards – particularly if they (claimed) they were engaging in philosophy. This was all because, for Wittgenstein, it mattered intensely. I think this is also key to Wittgenstein’s later dismissal of Schopenhauer. He may also have seen himself as something of a unique figure, but absolutely not in the sense of being marked out as exceptional, brilliant, or laudable – only in the sense of being deeply uncomfortable and highly distressed by things that didn’t seem to trouble others nearly so much.

Wittgenstein was notoriously brutal on himself. He was obsessed with purity, confession, and stripping away pretence – he often sought to try and confess or disclose his transgressions to those around him, for example. And it wasn’t just personal or psychological; he deeply believed that philosophy wasn’t just an intellectual exercise but a battle against one’s own vanity.

Wittgenstein later wrote that Schopenhauer “never searches his conscience.” I think he saw Schopenhauer as a hypocrite, really, who wrote brilliant things about the tragedy of human existence but didn’t actually suffer or work through them internally. Because Wittgenstein himself struggled constantly with his own ‘soul’ and feared being a “fraud” or a merely “reproductive” thinker rather than a truly original creator, he may well have applied that self-same scrutiny to Schopenhauer.

Let’s not forget that Schopenhauer lived a highly comfortable, bourgeois life, frequented fine restaurants, fought bitter legal battles over money with his mother, and was deeply vain about his own genius. It’s easy to then imagine that Wittgenstein came to look down on Schopenhauer for treating philosophy like a beautiful literary garment you could put on, rather than a painful, agonising restructuring of your soul.

link

My thesis on the fusion of liberal progressivism and capitalism optimization is irrefutable — Ricardo Duchesne

~ ABN ~ Leave a comment

Let me list some major retailers in determined to bring massive immigration into every small town in America and Canada and Europe.

Target, Costco, Home Depot, Lowe;s, Best Buy
Dollarama, Dollar Tree, Family Dollar, Dollar General ————– all thrive in neighbourhoods full of lower-income immigrants.

Burger King, Wendy’s, Subway, KFC, Pizza Hut, Tim Hortons are all heavily reliant on immigrant labor and drive-thru diverse consumers.

The list goes on: Starbucks, Dunkin’, Popeyes, Taco Bell, Eleven, Circle K, Petro-Canada, Shoppers Drug Mart, Rexall, Pharmaprix ———– are all heavily into immigrant labor and consumption.

The list is endless: Walgreens, CVS, Rite Aid,
Loblaws, No Frills, Sobeys, Metro, FreshCo, Amazon ———- are all enormous beneficiaries of both immigrant warehouse labor and diverse consumer growth.

IKEA, Canadian Tire, Winners, Marshalls, Uber, DoorDash, SkipTheDishes ——- are almost entirely dependent on recent immigrant labor.

My thesis on the fusion of liberal progressivism and capitalism optimization is irrefutable.

link

__________

Duchesne typically runs from any theory entailing mass immigration as a political or military strategy to destabilize and destroy the West. He probably does this because he does not want to face up to the central role of Jewish Supremacists and their many mentees, such as BLM, Antifa, NGOs, universities, etc. That said, what he says above is true enough and well-worth recognizing as a major factor in the weakening of the West. Propaganda and mind-control have analogous ‘benign’ features underlying their nefarious tactics — normal instinct, conformity, order, virtue signaling, etc. The complete picture of almost anything always has many sides to it. ABN

Five Mistakes in the Science That Gave Rise to the ‘HIV’ Myth

~ ABN ~ Leave a comment

For over four decades, the prevailing narrative surrounding AIDS has centered on the HIV virus as its primary cause, as posited by governments and health organizations worldwide. Despite this consensus, alternative theories have been largely suppressed or marginalized. In his book *The Real Anthony Fauci*, Robert Kennedy Jr. highlights the extensive body of evidence supporting these dissenting views, including over 900 references to academic literature. While some praise this work, critics argue that the endorsements come from lesser-known figures in the scientific community. One notable exception is the late Luc Montagnier, the Nobel Prize-winning researcher credited with discovering HIV, who acknowledged the presence of “many untruths” in the mainstream narrative about AIDS and supported Kennedy’s claims, suggesting that the understanding of AIDS and its causes is more complex than originally thought.

Montagnier’s own perspectives on the relationship between HIV and AIDS have evolved over time. In a 1992 interview, he indicated that HIV infection did not necessarily lead to AIDS and that other factors might contribute to the disease’s development. This sentiment echoes the views of other dissident scientists, such as Professor Peter Duesberg, who argued that recreational drug use was a significant factor in the early AIDS cases, rather than HIV itself. Duesberg’s critiques prompted significant backlash from the scientific community, which maintained a strong consensus on the HIV/AIDS connection. The UK’s Chief Medical Officer and other health authorities condemned dissenting views as potentially dangerous misinformation, reinforcing the prevailing narrative that linked HIV infection directly to AIDS.

One of the most significant challenges to the HIV/AIDS paradigm emerged from a 1993 paper published in *Bio/Technology*, which argued that the HIV tests used for diagnosis were never scientifically validated. This paper suggested that the antibodies detected in patients could be due to immune system abnormalities rather than the presence of HIV. The authors contended that the tests were based on circular reasoning, as they were designed to react with antibodies in AIDS patients without proving that these antibodies were specific to HIV. This argument revealed a critical flaw in the scientific basis for HIV testing and the resultant diagnosis of AIDS, casting doubt on the validity of the entire HIV/AIDS narrative.

Despite the overwhelming financial and political investments in the HIV/AIDS model, various researchers, including the Perth group led by Eleni Papadopulos-Eleopulos, have continued to challenge the established view. Their work identified five key mistakes in the foundational science, including the misinterpretation of reverse transcriptase activity and the failure to isolate and purify HIV particles. Additionally, they argued that the correlation between HIV and AIDS is artificial, stemming from the nature of the tests rather than a clear causal relationship. Their findings suggest that lifestyle factors, such as drug use and certain sexual practices, may be more relevant to the observed health crises than the presence of a virus. Despite decades of criticism and censorship, the critiques and alternative explanations offered by these researchers call for a reevaluation of the HIV/AIDS framework and its implications for public health and treatment strategies, potentially benefiting millions in the process.

link

__________

The above is an AI summary offered by the website which has posted the full article. The summary is a convenience for interested readers. Coincidentally, to my knowledge, Fauci is widely believed to have had as large a role in the ‘HIV myth’ as he has had in the covid-19 scamdemic. It is possible Fauci will be revealed to be the most successful psychopathic medical murderer in world history. ABN

Elon Musk promised DOGE would save taxpayers $1 TRILLION. But, it actually just paved his path to become a trillionaire. Let’s follow the money

~ ABN ~ Leave a comment

This will probably get suppressed, but I don’t care. It’s time.

Elon Musk promised DOGE would save taxpayers $1 TRILLION. But, it actually just paved his path to become a trillionaire. Let’s follow the money.

  • “Claimed savings”: Final DOGE claim was $214B saved. The independently verifiable amount was less than 5% of that, not including the actually costs.

Costs

  • The firing-and-rehiring churn cost ~ $135B.
  • Week one: 17 inspector generals fired who return $26 per $1 spent and catch the very things happening right now with the Trump family ventures, Elon’s ventures, AI, etc.
  • They didn’t touch the $850B Pentagon budget that has never passed an audit.
  • Also untouched were the $38B in government contracts flowing to Elon.
  • Data privacy breaches by DOGE employees

And before you say that he worked for free, he did not have to file a financial disclosure because he “worked for free”. This looks more like a workaround.

Elon donated over $290M to Trump’s campaign. The morning Trump was sworn in, Musk’s companies faced $2.37B in legal exposure across 11 federal agencies.

Then he was handed power over those same agencies. Inside the first quarter, six of the regulators investigating Elon’s companies were cut, closed, or told to stand down.

So, he spent ~$290M to elect Trump and he left office with his cases dead and SpaceX ~$6B RICHER in NEW defense contracts.
That is not a Department of Government Efficiency.

And as someone who was on the inside when this all went down, the strategy behind finding these contracts was incredibly inefficient and just caused defense contractors, such as Booz Allen Hamilton, to merely change their name from consulting to technology. It merely caused word changes in contracts. Contracts that are bloated and should be cut, weren’t even looked at. And in the end, it cost tax payers exponentially more than it saved, including data privacy,

Just want to call out the reality of how Space X and this shady IPO even came about.

link

__________

I have do not know how to verify these claims, but they are worth posting. ABN

European sacred symbols

~ ABN ~ Leave a comment

link

__________

Both Baltic and Finnic symbols have what looks like a Dharma Wheel, the eight points of which signify the Noble Eightfold Path. Both regions have ancient Scythian roots. Scythian power was based on the war chariot, which in ancient times was sophisticated technology requiring many trained humans and horses. There is strong evidence the Buddha was Scythian1. His moniker Shakyamuni means ‘sage of the Scythians’. There is also evidence that Laozi2, the founder of Daoism in China, was either a disciple of Shakyamuni/ Gautama (Lao Dan) Buddha or a member of a group of Scythian philosophers who had great impact on the ancient world. ABN

  1. Historian Christopher Beckwith argues in The Scythian Empire that Laozi (Lao Tzu) was a Scythian philosopher, identified as Gautama or Lao-Tan, who taught in early China. 
     Beckwith posits that Laozi was an immigrant outsider who, like Zoroaster and the Buddha, founded Daoism by introducing Scythian philosophy to Chinese society. 
    Beckwith’s interpretation includes several key claims:
    Scythian Origin: Laozi bore a Scythian name and was part of a group of Scythian-linked thinkers who spread across Eurasia between 600 and 400 BCE.
    Philosophical Content: Laozi’s teachings on logic, epistemology, and ethics were inspired by Early Buddhism and focused on resolving conflicting antilogies rather than mystical or political theory. 
    Rejection of Tradition: Like other Axial Age figures, Laozi criticized and rejected the traditional beliefs of his adoptive culture, establishing a new philosophical framework centered on equanimity and the relativity of absolute assertions. 
    Cultural Impact: Beckwith suggests that the Scythian influence, embodied by figures like Laozi, was instrumental in creating the first powerful states and philosophical traditions in China, Persia, and India.  ↩︎
  2. The Chinese characters for the names associated with the philosopher are:
    Laozi: 老子
    Literally translates to “Old Master” or “Old Child.”
    老 (Lǎo) means “old.”
    子 (Zǐ) means “master,” “child,” or “philosopher.” 
    Lao Tan (also spelled Lao Dan): 老聃
    This is the personal name often attributed to Laozi in early texts like the Zhuangzi.
    老 (Lǎo) means “old.”
    聃 (Dān/Tán) refers to having long ears or a drooping earlobe, a feature traditionally associated with wisdom and longevity in Chinese physiognomy. 
    Historical records, such as Sima Qian’s Shiji, also mention his surname as Li (李) and his given name as Er (耳, meaning “ear”) or Dan (聃). 
     Thus, he is sometimes referred to as Li Er (李耳) or Li Dan (李聃).  ↩︎