McCullough testifies in Maine against vax mandate

According to McCullough, these deaths and ailments are among “patients who did not have any of these serious conditions prior to the onset of the vaccine program who developed or died within 28 days of receiving a [COVID] vaccine.” The data was quarried to rule out anyone who had a record of any of these ailments since Jan. 1, 2020. Thus, these are not people who were sick with some of the blood disorders listed in the table. It doesn’t mean that all of them died of the vaccine, but it sure is suspicious.

As McCullough noted, “Twenty-eight days within the administration of any investigational drug or product is within a regulatory window of concern” and is therefore “of interest” to regulators.

Although there is no way to prove definitively, absent an investigation, that all or most of them were due to the vaccine, McCullough asserted that it is concerning given that some of the other reported injuries seem to align with some of the known side effects from the vaccine. For example, 216 suffered an embolism and 201 developed a low platelet count. “These are well-known syndromes that can occur after the vaccine,” noted the doctor. “In fact, there is a disease now called vaccine induced thrombocytopenic purpura, which is serious – it’s related to thrombosis, related to severe anemia, related to organ dysfunction like kidney failure, and this has occurred in 201 individuals in Maine within the vaccine. This is not something that has any spontaneous occurrence at this level.”

link

A Report on Myocarditis Adverse Events in the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) in Association with COVID-19 Injectable Biological Products

Based on this study, the risk of suffering myocarditis subsequent to injection with the mRNA-based products is low with an average of 4 individuals suffering myocarditis per million fully injected. However, the Israeli Ministry of Health recently announced that approximately 1 in 4,500 men ages 16 to 24 who received BNT162b2 developed myocarditis.46 This rate is much higher than the rate estimated based on VAERS data and could reflect variation in reporting. Nonetheless, the risk is higher for the young with an average of 28 12-15-year-olds succumbing to myocarditis per million fully immunized. 

link to study

This study covers only myocarditis risks associated with covid vaxxes. Schools and health authorities are forcing healthy young people to risk their lives by taking a vax that provides no statistical benefit for them, only harm. Is this the tyranny of the old, the woke, the greedy, or the stupid? ABN

Covid vaxxes do not allow the small changes that promote co-existence with the virus because they remove these variants from the milieu

@EthicalSkeptic @BrendanEich @NickHudsonCT @lalasugarloaf

One hypothesis is that much of Asia/Oceania had been exposed to a previous SARS variant. This being the actual reason that rates of infection were so low, not lockdowns and masks.
1/

Now we may be seeing turnover where Western countries have had a much more aggressive recent pandemic and have residual resistance to a more recent SARS strain, closer in lineage to Delta.
2/

If true, we will see vicious outbreaks of the more contagious variants moving through populations naive to current variants(in Asia/Oceania now being exposed). If this pattern is true:
1) The pandemic will become endemic moving in waves between unsynchronized populations.
3/

2) This will prove that the new mRNA vaccines cannot ever be expected to eradicate the virus unless we find non-mutating epitopes for which antibodies can be developed.
3) Broad spectrum immunity(natural) may confer much broader protection in this pattern.
4/

The theory would be that variant evolution would partially escape not totally escape broad spectrum resistance meaning cases may be more mild as the variants emerge than with total vaccine breakthrough.
5/

4) If this endemic wave pattern is established we would suspect that current vaccine strategies would need to be changed:
a) the current narrow spectrum vaccines will induce rapid evolution triggering a rapid never ending series of related pandemics.
6/

b) rapid escape evolution increases the probability of worse variants and extinguishes variants that may be more mild and currently somewhat protective.
7/

c) in normal evolution no preference is made between large and small mutations but with vaccines, the mutations that confer survival become much more important and require complete escape.
8/

As a matter of fact, vaccines never allow the small changes that might promote co-existence with virus, because the vaccines remove these variants from the milieu.
9/

5) It is time to consider strategy modifications:
-rapid development of antibody treatments as variants develop
-encourage evolution of co-existence with the virus
-concentrate on treating effects of the virus to mitigate damage through therapeutics
10/

-stop protecting low risk populations to extinguish outbreaks as fast as possible. [also protect them from needless, counterproductive exposure to vax harm. ABN]

We do not normally see these patterns in attenuated virus vaccines, because they are broad spectrum vaccines.
11/

When we focus on vaccines that narrowly extinguish the current dominant strain, we encourage big mutations and total escape.
12/

The narrowly focused vaccines have the effect of destroying the virus that could become safe and we are faced with new virus strains with major changes. We need to rethink this current approach, immediately.
/end

Originally tweeted by Philosophical Engineer (@letsthinkdeeply) on October 12, 2021.

A microscopy analysis of a Moderna covid vaccine

(1/n) A microscopy analysis of a Moderna #Covidvaccine sample.
A fresh sample was analyzed with bright field and phase contrast microscopy. The cold chain was maintained and rigorous hygiene standards were applied.
These are the results:

(2/n) Particles and structures of different size and light refraction properties are visible in the vaccine when focusing on the border of the drop (yellow asterisk).

(3/n) Higher magnification reveals a wide spectrum of structures, including for example a rod-shaped structure (yellow arrow) with a length of about 14 µm (i.e. about twice as long as a red blood cell).

Continue reading “A microscopy analysis of a Moderna covid vaccine”

Too many people are dying and it’s showing

Demographers are starting to notice a puzzling increase in mortality, especially among the young, and it is a big mystery. Very ominous article, indicating the mortality from the vaxes may just be beginning. The problem with autoimmunities is they can affect anything, even things which don’t produce clearly defined symptoms immediately, like the heart. But all the while it is like that tissue is aging at an incredible rate, and by the time symptoms show up, significant damage is already done.

link

From the linked article:

So the question to ask ourselves is: What has changed? It appears plausible that the excess mortality seen throughout Europe is caused by the vaccination campaign against COVID-19. After all, the excess deaths that we witness, fit the kind of characteristics of the deaths we’ve seen from the vaccine: They are typically cases of heart failure or strokes, they occur suddenly in otherwise healthy people and they’re not really age-linked the way most illness is.

link

Mike Whitney pulls no punches: Will Vaccine-Linked Deaths Rise Sharply This Winter?

Blood clots, bleeding and autoimmunity are not trivial matters; they’re an indication that the body’s vital infrastructure has been compromised and, perhaps, severely damaged. This is going to manifest itself in all-cause mortality and broader public health data. A sizable portion of these maladies will be directly connected to the injection of a potentially-lethal pathogen into the bloodstream of millions of people who were deliberately misled about the safety of the product. Now we’re going to see the early results of that experiment. God help us.

link

This is the strongest, most dire and bleak prognostication on mass vax I have read. It’s also more likely than not. The evidence cited by Whitney can all be found on American Buddhist Net and we share his gloomy vision of the future. A central point in Whitney’s analysis is the inescapable conclusion that top people, including health officials, wanted this outcome. They had to have known the consequences of their policies. ABN

If I were an epidemiologist – and I could not explain the observations below – I would resign my position and become a heretic to my profession – as a bastion of pretenders

If I were an epidemiologist – and I could not explain the observations below – I would resign my position and become a heretic to my profession – as a bastion of pretenders.

But once you have letters behind your name, all self-accountability evaporates.

Originally tweeted by Ethical Skeptic ☀ (@EthicalSkeptic) on October 10, 2021.

Images enlarged:

Image
Image
Image

COVID: “Prior spread 100%”

Covid spread to entire world in just 1 month in Apr 2020…

Yet Delta has taken 16 months to do the same thing, despite being twice as communicable than that Apr 2020 variant. Hmm… Wow.

This tells me that the spread in April 2020 was observation effect.

Prior spread, 100%.

I'll modify this to 4 months vs. 14 months, just to ensure apples-to-apples… but the argument still stands. Add to this a 4 month spread during the most extreme mitigation measures.

Originally tweeted by Ethical Skeptic ☀ (@EthicalSkeptic) on October 9, 2021.

“There is only one model which explains this ‘must explain’ facet of the analytical domain”: Ethical Skeptic

1. An earlier release of Covid in China (2017/18)
2. Two years of global asymmetric spread (what it is doing now even)
3. E65 – 180 prior immunity to COVID itself.

[Ethical Skeptic above. Covid19Crusher below Links at bottom. ABN]

Those pandemic differences remain staggering and poorly explained:

Originally tweeted by Covid19Crusher (@Covid19Crusher) on October 8, 2021.

Originally tweeted by Ethical Skeptic ☀ (@EthicalSkeptic) on October 8, 2021.

If Ethical Skeptic is correct, and I find it very likely he is, then these data are showing that covid began in China in 2017. The most sinister interpretation of this is that China knowingly released covid or a milder version of covid early to inoculate its population against covid19, which it released later. A more benign interpretation is covid escaped the Wuhan lab in 2017. The inoculation this earlier version provided spread throughout the region, thus greatly dampening the effect of covid19 in those areas. Though the disease was worse in Europe and America, many people in these regions have also been inoculated by the earlier version of covid. A central fact to all analyses of covid is it seems to be conclusive that the virus is an engineered bioweapon. ABN