‘Died Suddenly’ – An Explanation

Protein Folding

It sure looks like protein folding irregularities lie at the heart of severe COVID-19, long COVID and vaccine harm (both immediate and delayed), these being driven by the presence of the spike protein. A Midwestern Doctor draws upon a solid body of research to reach the following conclusion:

In summary, this study demonstrated that there are always slightly irregular or misfolded fibrous blood clots being formed within the body, but at the same time the body has a mechanism for removing them. However, once small amounts of spike protein are added into the mix (at concentrations I believe will be reached through vaccination) those irregular fibrous clots spiral out of control and come to dominate the clotting process. At this point, the body’s mechanisms for removing them are no longer able to outpace this growth function and they instead grow until they are constrained in size by the blood vessels they are within like the large fibrous clots shown in Died Suddenly.

Ante Mortem Hypercoagulation

My penny worth – as expressed in my initial article – is that these clotting processes likely continue after death, these grotesque results being an example of ante mortem hypercoagulation. I’ve chewed this over with a switched-on GP and we agree that the size and quantity of fibre and clots, along with the level of blood decomposition seen by embalmers, is not plausible in a living person. We presume that the emergence of Sudden Adult Death Syndrome (SADS) and the rise in excess young death around the globe is due to onset of these processes.

link

Many have pointed out problems with the movie “Died Suddenly” and also many have pointed out there is a lot of evidence for the clots. This article provides a probable explanation for why so many clots are being found by embalmers. ABN

Data analysis: sudden death cases from Canada for 2018-2022

The main reason we did this keyword search is that we see lots of articles/videos (at least in the alternative media) mentioning that the number of sudden death cases have risen in the past 1 year and 10 months but they never do the exact computations for the current and past years so we never have a reference (before 2021) to use in order to check if we are in familiar ground or really in black swan territory in terms of the number of sudden death cases.

link

The new BA.5 bivalent booster has not worked

If you use a sub-optimal vaccine that induces a sub-optimal, immature, underdeveloped, sub-lethal immune pressure on the target antigen (in this case the binding sites on the spike protein), then this is the perfect setting for natural selection to ‘select’ for more infectious variants that can overcome the sub-optimal vaccinal antibody pressure. These ‘fitter, stronger variants become enriched in the environment and then become dominant e.g. now BQ.1s as above. You Francis Collins, Bourla, Fauci, Bancel, Walensky et al. cannot be this stupid to continue with this failed vaccine especially the failed bivalent booster that would have become a mismatch to the antigen. It has. Then is there malfeasance? We need to know.

link

The question is not ‘Is there a pull forward effect?’ ~ THE Random Dude

The question is not ‘Is there a pull forward effect?’

The question is ‘Why would a person take advisement about Covid trends, from someone who does not even grasp that it exists?’

All Cause Mortality Analysis = Deception

The pull forward effect exists in ALL competently run numbers.

Only charlatans leave it unaddressed.

Originally tweeted by THE Random Dude ☀ (@EthicalSkeptic) on November 24, 2022.

This is important information that all of us should understand. It is not hard to understand. This string has follow-up questions and comments. MSM and US health officials and academics consistently fudge the importance of this kind of statistical analysis or—what’s worse—do not understand it or even know of it. ABN

‘I give all the sources, methods, fields, formulas, ref-tables, calcs, risk points, conservancy checks, assumptions, etc. necessary in replicating the work’ ~ The Ethical Skeptic

The trolls like to pretend ‘I challenged his work!~ THAT’s why he blocked me. Harrumph!’ BS… 🤡

I only block a** h***s.

I give all the sources, methods, fields, formulas, ref-tables, calcs, risk points, conservancy checks, assumptions, etc. necessary in replicating the work.

click image for larger

The reality is —> They can’t do the work.

They crave so badly to be hailed as a super-smart-troll.

If I wasted my time teaching insincere people to do this work, it would take 2+ yrs. In the meantime we all would suffer a net loss in research & insight.

Only the troll wins.

I have had several congressional/senate offices call, to have their PhD analysts walk through the work with me.

They asked pointed questions. I gave specific and resolute answers.

I explained how I did each step, how it was conservative, and how it was reality checked.

So I hope that you all understand, why I do not consider trolls as any form of ‘peer review’.

I will not suffer fools.

This is too important.

Originally tweeted by Ethical Skeptic ☀ (@EthicalSkeptic) on November 21, 2022.

This is an important post by TES. For many months, he has been plagued by credentialed trolls even though he has explained his work fully. In this post, he is clear as a bell so even the trolls can understand. His work is an example of what the entire West is up against. Good people doing good work are trolled, cancelled, vilified by what are essentially parasites ensconced in parasitic communities, i.e. the woke, virtually all of academia, most of government, IC, foreign actors, secret societies, etc. TES is a rare example of an individual who has been able to bear the abuse and triumph. On the one hand he is an inspiration. On the other, he shows how bad our situation is in stark detail. He possesses rare skills, rare moral strength, rare perseverance that few can match. ABN

What is Causing the Explosion of RSV?

Many of you have observed an explosion of RSV and to a lesser extent influenza (e.g. a friend called me up today to ask if it was linked to the vaccine and many colleagues have reached out to me about the unprecedented surge they are observing in patients). Although I expected this, it is still somewhat disconcerting to see this happen as RSV is typically not a major concern outside of very specific patient populations.

I first started seeing signs of this trend last year when Australia reported a huge spike in RSV over the summer. This summer, Australia experienced an unprecedented spike in both influenza and RSV. This has led many experts to become worried about the threat we were facing from these diseases and emphasize the urgent need to develop a vaccine for RSV (the last one was pulled because it caused enhanced respiratory disease). 

Many vaccines are currently in clinical trials (with vaccines expected to be available next year) and Moderna is presently developing an mRNA vaccine for RSV while Pfizer is opting for a more traditional design. Due to the “emergent” nature of the RSV situation, everyone appears to be going for an accelerated approval which skips the necessary time for the safety testing process, which as the last few years have shown, may not be the best idea when a vaccine already had known safety concerns.

link

Excellent article, very clearly argued. Highly recommended. ABN

Finland exposes massive covid reporting scandal — nearly 40% of deaths were not from covid

Finland has become one of the first countries to uncover evidence that state agencies around the world committed fraud in their Covid deaths reporting during the pandemic.

The blockbuster report sheds light on how public health agencies around the world overhyped ‘Covid-related deaths’ in order to drive mass hysteria.

According to Sirkka Goebeler, chief specialist at the Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), Covid-19 has not been the actual cause of death in up to 40 percent of fatalities attributed to the illness in Finland. As a result, they will not end up in Statistics Finland’s official data as coronavirus deaths.

link

So, what have we learned? ~ The Ethical Skeptic

So, what have we learned?

Well, first – after months of saying that these charts were 'all made up', most of the troll audience is begrudgingly admitting we have an Excess Non-Covid Natural Cause Mortality problem now. 'Long Covid' in their minds.

That settled, TES was right.

Then we learned that both the pharma trolls and the CDC colluded, especially to fraudulently deny the escalation in cancers. Both were caught by TES in that fraud.

Again, TES charts turned out to be correct.

[This is a very important thread that all intelligent people should read and understand. This outlines the fraud perpetrated on the world by US and other health care authorities, including shitty academics and craven doctors. If this thread is not unrolling well, please use this link for the same information. Or go to TES’s Twitter feed to find it there. ABN]

Continue reading “So, what have we learned? ~ The Ethical Skeptic”

The confinement of the healthy

COVID-19 represents the first time in the history of pandemics that we confined healthy populations. While the ancients did not understand the mechanisms of infectious disease—they knew nothing of viruses and bacteria—they nevertheless figured out many ways to mitigate the spread of contagion during epidemics. These time-tested measures ranged from quarantining symptomatic patients to enlisting those with natural immunity, who had recovered from the illness, to care for the sick.

From the lepers in the Old Testament to the plague of Justinian in Ancient Rome to the 1918 Spanish flu pandemic, lockdowns were never part of conventional public health measures. The concept of lockdowns arose in part from a public health apparatus that had become militarized over the previous two decades. We now routinely hear of “countermeasures,” but doctors and nurses never use that word, which is a term of spycraft and soldiering. 

In 1968, while an estimated one to four million people died in the H3N2 influenza pandemic, businesses and schools stayed open and large events were never cancelled. Until 2020 we had not previously locked down entire populations, because that strategy does not work. In 2020 we had zero empirical evidence that lockdowns would save lives, only flawed mathematical models whose predications were not just slightly off, but wildly exaggerated by orders of magnitude.

link