The perdocent exploits the claim of not having been taught how to do something, as a means of not understanding, of taking control, or to avoid doing any actual work. As a management professional, no matter their appeal to credential, never let a perdocent take control. Always seek to maintain familiarity with the perdocent’s tactics of ego, laziness, and cleverly concealed dishonesty.
Yeadon told us this would happen in December of 2019. We posted his warnings on ABN when they came out. Alterative covid science and information has consistently been much, much better than the deliberately “nudged” disinformation coming from the CDC, FDA, NIH, NIAID. I am not proud or happy about that at all. It makes me sick. Our entire government needs a huge house cleaning. I would be content with paying the perps off and letting them live out their lives indulging in their ill-gotten gains if they just go away and let us put honest people in charge. Imagine if Yeadon, McCullough, Malone, Craig, and so many others had guided us through this pandemic instead of the narcissistic Fauci, Walensky, Collins, Birx, etc. ABN
Controlled covid information is and was information promoted by the US government, US mainstream media, mainstream science, mainstream academia, Big Pharma, most state governments, school systems, etc.
Uncontrolled covid information is and was all the information that disagreed with the above and sometimes agreed with the above.
Everyone—all of us—had skin in the game. The debate between controlled and uncontrolled information has been waging since early 2020 and continues today.
It is very important and significant that today we can say that uncontrolled information won the debate conclusively. We beat the crap out of controlled information. The nudgers lost very badly.
I bring this up and emphasize it because it is important that we all reflect on this and seal it in our minds. Uncontrolled—anarchic—information is the path to truth, justice, and the American way. We winnowed out the bullshit, considered many ideas that did not pan out, were afraid of no thoughts whatever, yet rarely if ever supported or promoted anything that was not sound information.
Covid is the single best example in our lifetimes of the power and brilliance of the free exchange of uncensored information. Compared to the controlled and restricted information demanded by the parties described in paragraph one above, uncensored information has won the debate decisively and been on the winning side for the duration of the argument.
I believe this very large example involving the entire world can serve as an example for all kinds of information and all kinds of debates.
Clearly, we must work very hard to ensure free speech, free information, no censorship, no governmental control of information. There is no single issue that is more important and covid has proved it. ABN
Sceptical scientists from around the world are flocking to sign the World Climate Declaration (WCD) that states there is no climate emergency. The WCD notes that climate science has degenerated into a discussion based on beliefs, not on sound, self-critical science. Over 100 scientists and professionals have signed the Declaration since August 18th, when the Daily Sceptichighlighted the project and interest soared across social media.
The WCD is particularly critical of climate models that provide the ‘evidence’ for most of the Net Zero agenda. “We should free ourselves from the naïve belief in immature climate models,” says the WCD. Models have many shortcomings and “are not remotely plausible as global policy tools”, it adds. The WCD started with 500 signatories and has now grown to over 1,200. The lead author is the Norwegian physics Nobel Prize winner Professor Ivar Giaever.
I have Asperger’s and my “special interest” is gender ideology, which means I spend every waking minute thinking and problem-solving on how to quell this monster. Everything points to exposing the abysmal quality of “scientific evidence” that props up their beliefs. 🧵
The concept that one has a “gender identity” rooted in sex-based stereotypes that can differ from the body is complete pseudoscience that hails from the most intellectually bankrupt sectors of the social sciences. There is absolutely no biological basis to support that claim.
Activists claim that gray matter studies prove there is a biological basis for trans identities, but they didn’t control for homosexuality. Similar studies were done that did control for homosexuality. Guess what? There’s a biological basis for homosexuality—not trans identities!
The claim that “gender affirming” care is “life saving” and that trans-identified people are more likely to kill themselves if they don’t receive it is a lie based on a bad interpretation of statistics.
The studies these activist-researchers put out are genuinely worthless. Biased samples, poor experiment design, bad methodology & erroneously drawn conclusions from their data. Yet they are picked up by mainstream media and hailed as irrefutable proof.
@UWMedicine found that the use of puberty blockers and hormones didn't improve the mental health of trans-identified teens, but published a study claiming they did. When they were caught, they conspired to conceal it.
The scientists who claim sex is a spectrum use hermaphroditism in animals and irrelevant developmental conditions in humans to support their beliefs. There are two sexes because there are two sex cells that the anatomy is organized around in development.
I’m telling you guys, all of the “evidence” propping up gender ideology is junk that must be exposed if we want to see any real change. They use the authority of “science” to stifle debate, affect policy and influence social media platforms’ rules on censorship.
We need a task force to critique the studies they use to support their beliefs. We need to amplify the work that’s already done by unbiased researchers & make it more accessible to lay people by breaking down main points. We need a central hub where all this info can be located.
Recently a person claiming to represent 'Covid Science' did a sleight-of-hand hack job on my Cancer tracking chart that I derive from CDC data.
We take you through that parade of deception & incompetence in 5 panels, after exemplifying how this work is professionally done below.
The 1st sleight-of-hand he used involves decrementing UCoD depressed cancer deaths from the totals.
He failed to us the Wonder Database to double-check and see if the lowered Cancer death rates were real, or merely an Underlying Cause of Death effect (i.e. Died 'with' Covid).
However, it also shows something much larger: Confirmation that the vaccines have no (mortality) efficacy. That’s what I’ll make clear in this article. The results also point to my recent observation that all of the U.S. statistics appear to be confounded by wealth effects for which no agencies are making statistical corrections.
American Buddhist Net 