Controlled Or Catastrophic Disclosure w/ Daniel Sheehan

Over his career, Daniel Sheehan has participated in numerous legal cases of public interest, including the Pentagon Papers case, the Watergate Break-In case, the Silkwood case, the Greensboro massacre case, the La Penca bombing case and others. He established the Christic Institute and the Romero Institute, two non-profit public policy centers. Since 2015 Sheehan has lectured on American history, politics and the assassination of John F. Kennedy at the University of California, Santa Cruz.[2] Sheehan is currently Chief Counsel of the Romero Institute, where his focus is the Lakota People’s Law Project. Sheehan and The Lakota People’s Law Project participated in legal cases related to the Dakota Access Pipeline protests. In 2013 Sheehan published Daniel Sheehan: The People’s Advocate, a memoir, through Counterpoint Publishing.

UPDATE: This is a very important interview. I have watched about one-half of it and am pretty sure, given Kill-Or-Be-Killed rules, there is no chance significant information will be released to the public.

KOBK itself is not precisely a morality but it does force moral decisions on top people. They have no choice but to play by KOBK rules. Their only way out of KOBK is defeat. KOBK is winner-take-all, loser-loses-all.

Any technology that can yield a super-weapon will be pursued and will not be given up or shared with ‘the world’ which obviously includes KOBK adversaries.

Right now there are three main contenders for world domination. We do not know precisely who they are but can roughly locate them geographically. They are: 1) the powers that control the West; 2) the powers that control China; and 3) the powers that control Russia.

KOBK rules force Russia and China to cooperate, for now. They also force Western power(s) to pursue world-domination against any alliance that may threaten it. This of course means China and Russia today.

It may feel weird to think from the point of view of a top KOBK player, but try it. If you are at the top of Western power, would you give up a super-weapon or the chance of creating a super-weapon, with or without alien technology?

To do so would cause your defeat in the KOBK arena by gifting to your adversaries—who are as ruthless as you—the best means you have to win the battle for global domination.

Another take on this is the alien stuff is a bluff. The super-weapon is a bluff to unsettle KOBK adversaries, keep them wondering, keep them in check. Before you weigh this possibility, factor in how recklessly and apparently ‘incompetently’ Westerns powers have been behaving. Incompetence can be a ruse as well as an excuse.

Did top KOBK players in the West seize control of the West through incompetence and recklessness? Or did they seize control of the West through strategic competence and well-calculated daring?

If we factor in their past behavior, we would do well to assume they are very savvy deep players who have beaten everyone to get to the top and who do not back down. This is why I do not believe we will see anything significant coming from this bill. ABN

Leave a comment