No small matter. Just below is the study. Below that is an article about the study.

The mRNA-based BNT162b2 vaccine from Pfizer/BioNTech was the first registered COVID-19 vaccine and has been shown to be up to 95% effective in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infections. Little is known about the broad effects of the new class of mRNA vaccines, especially whether they have combined effects on innate and adaptive immune responses. Here we confirmed that BNT162b2 vaccination of healthy individuals induced effective humoral and cellular immunity against several SARS-CoV-2 variants. Interestingly, however, the BNT162b2 vaccine also modulated the production of inflammatory cytokines by innate immune cells upon stimulation with both specific (SARS-CoV-2) and non-specific (viral, fungal and bacterial) stimuli. The response of innate immune cells to TLR4 and TLR7/8 ligands was lower after BNT162b2 vaccination, while fungi-induced cytokine responses were stronger. In conclusion, the mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine induces complex functional reprogramming of innate immune responses, which should be considered in the development and use of this new class of vaccines.

The BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 reprograms both adaptive and innate immune responses

I was very surprised to find this article referring to the study above on the front page of Google’s general news feed: Research suggests Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine reprograms innate immune responses.

Researchers in The Netherlands and Germany have warned that Pfizer-BioNTech’s coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine induces complex reprogramming of innate immune responses that should be considered in the development and use of mRNA-based vaccines.

Research suggests Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine reprograms innate immune responses

This kind of information is normally kept from the eyes of the general public. I wonder if it slipped through because the language is somewhat complex and studiously neutral. Of course, reprogramming our innate immune system is the biggest fear we have about these vaccines because once reprogrammed, the innate immune response will stay that way for decades, even a whole life. Changing something as complex as our natural immune system which is the fruit of millions of years of evolution is dangerous. Period. No doubt about that. Will these changes be passed on to offspring? Will they be contagious as the artificial spike proteins induced by the vaccines appear to be? What does an unplanned change in our immune response to fungi bode for the future? Clearly, these are not questions to be answered by vaccinating as much of the world as you can.

Twelve key questions about COVID-19 and lockdowns answered. All answers fully referenced from peer-reviewed research and leading authorities.

COVID-19: Just the Facts

The linked article provides a very good summary of the main covid issues. It centers on UK policies, statistics, and concerns but its conclusions largely apply to USA and world as well.

I found the section on vaccines wanting due to relying too much on dubious government statistics. In USA, it is of great concern that the CDC appears to have deliberately manipulated covid infection and mortality rates to make the disease seem worse and the vaccines better than they are. Also of great concern in USA is the banning and shunning of effective treatments such as ivermectin and budesonide, among others. Even worse it appears these treatments have been deliberately pushed aside so that Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) could be issued for the “experimental vaccines.” That would constitute a crime against humanity if true. I am not sure how much US policy affects UK, but it is probably considerable. Underlying policies for most nations appear to have some “global” source, either the WHO, elite herd mentality, or something more sinister.

Meta-analyses based on 18 randomized controlled treatment trials of ivermectin in COVID-19 have found large, statistically significant reductions in mortality, time to clinical recovery, and time to viral clearance. Furthermore, results from numerous controlled prophylaxis trials report significantly reduced risks of contracting COVID-19 with the regular use of ivermectin. Finally, the many examples of ivermectin distribution campaigns leading to rapid population-wide decreases in morbidity and mortality indicate that an oral agent effective in all phases of COVID-19 has been identified.

Review of the Emerging Evidence Demonstrating the Efficacy of Ivermectin in the Prophylaxis and Treatment of COVID-19

Article about the study:

“We did the work that the medical authorities failed to do, we conducted the most comprehensive review of the available data on ivermectin,” said Pierre Kory, MD, president and chief medical officer of the FLCCC. “We applied the gold standard to qualify the data reviewed before concluding that ivermectin can end this pandemic.”

A focus of the manuscript was on the 27 controlled trials available in January 2021, 15 of which were randomised controlled trials (RCT’s).

Consistent with numerous meta-analyses of ivermectin RCT’s since published by expert panels from the UK, Italy, Spain and Japan, they found a large, statistically significant reduction in mortality, time to recovery, and viral clearance in COVID-19 patients treated with ivermectin.

“Our latest research shows, once again, that when the totality of the evidence is examined, there is no doubt that ivermectin is highly effective as a safe prophylaxis and treatment for COVID-19,” said Paul E. Marik, founding member of the FLCCC and Chief, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine at Eastern Virginia Medical School.

Immediate Use of Ivermectin Medicine Globally Can End COVID-19 Pandemic: Scientists

Further reading: A plan to eradicate SARS-CoV-2 in Belgium in six weeks using ivermectin

When something in data is this unusual, we have to ask questions, no matter how uncomfortable they may be. It is an undeniable fact that this peak in deaths coincided with the mass roll-out of novel mRNA/DNA vaccines, on an extremely vulnerable population. If you compare the week ending 11 December 2020 with the week ending 29 January 2021, there was a 62% increase in total deaths and a 170% increase in COVID-19 labelled deaths in care homes.

Mortality data & COVID-19

Are we seeing similar figures in USA?

From their website: “HART is a group of highly qualified UK doctors, scientists, economists, psychologists and other academic experts.”

Included in this week’s bulletin:

Should children be vaccinated against COVID-19? The risk vs benefit calculation gives a resounding: no
Still no end in sight Huge ad campaign to run into 2022
Unqualified celebrities promote vaccination New NHS film misinforms and misrepresents
Ivermectin is effective More endorsement for the anti-parasitic drug
New variant not responsible for winter wave The true cause needs investigating
Natural vs vaccine immunity Which is safer or more protective?
An update from the USA Even more citizens are living free

6 May 2021 – bulletin

Researchers in Singapore have investigated the role of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies and T-cells in asymptomatic individuals suffering from COVID-19. They found that, contrary to some initial hypotheses, asymptomatic individuals mount an adaptive immune response on par with symptomatic individuals, demonstrating that T cell response does not appear to be correlated with symptom severity.

Highly efficient immune response in asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 patients

Berkeley MPI – Age 85+ excess deaths by

Korea – Taiwan – Italy – US

1. Korea and Taiwan 3 years of excess deaths
2. Italy 2 years of excess deaths
3. US 1 year of excess deaths

Shows migration of a death cause from East to West since Mar 2018. pic.twitter.com/O0S82t9hZJ

— Ethical Skeptic ☀ (@EthicalSkeptic) May 6, 2021

Larger version of image above: