60,000 scientists call for an end to mass vaccination: “Those who are not vulnerable should immediately be allowed to resume life as normal”

What do they advocate? “focused” protection. That is to say, to protect as much as possible the elderly, the infirm, the frail and to leave the others to live normally until the society reaches the collective immunity. However, mass vaccination by mRNA makes this collective immunity impossible.
One of the original co-signatories was Dr. Simon Thornley, an epidemiologist and biostatistician at the University of Auckland. The Great Barrington Declaration has since been signed by 60,000 physicians and scientists and is becoming increasingly well known around the world. A petition has so far gathered 870,000 signatures of support.

link

Canadian province stops giving boosters to elders who have had COVID in the past due to severe, life-threatening side effects

Elders in that category reacted very poorly to the booster. Many patients developed a fever after receiving their third dose.

They lost appetite, became physically weak, tired and lethargic, Le Devoir reported.

In more severe cases, the booster dose caused the patients difficulties in breathing and lowering oxygen levels.

Some elders also became delirious after receiving the injection.

link

SOUTH AFRICA: Omicron is “mild, whether you’re a child, 80, vaccinated or unvaccinated…”

🚨🚨Please listen

Dr Angelique Coetzee of the South African Medical Association says TODAY

@TomSwarbrick1 @LBC

RT !

“It’s mild, whether you’re a child , 80 , vaccinated or unvaccinated..”

WOW 😮

Originally tweeted by Adam Brooks (@EssexPR) on December 12, 2021.

South African medical care and understanding of infectious disease is first-rate, according to Dr Robert Malone. I mention this because, as he says, some people may feel their information on Omicron is not reliable. ABN

The China did it on purpose hypothesis gets stronger

So this analysis now becomes … not just very important, but pivotal…
Omicron bore a modification to this peptide to make it weaker… remember, Omicron’s genetics are older than the stronger forms of SARS-CoV-2…
A form with a proline change (Omicron) was used to create immunity, then the stronger form hit those nations without immunity hard.

"The binding epitope on [SARS-CoV-2] S [Spike Protein] harbors a sequence motif unique to SARS-CoV-2 (not present in other SARS-related coronaviruses), which is highly similar in both sequence and structure to the bacterial superantigen staphylococcal enterotoxin B."

Of the many mutations in omicron the most interesting two are in the SEB domain.

Staphylococcus Enterotoxin B is a peptide that is classified as a bioweapon.

When ingested it creates symptoms very similar to COVID and it’s know to trigger cytokine storms

It’s well described in Cheng et al.

This known toxin was warp sped into spike only Vaccines.
SEB is directly adjacent to the FCS.

Continue reading “The China did it on purpose hypothesis gets stronger”

Geert Vanden Bossche offers a positive message

This is a positive message from G. Vanden Bossche (can you imagine?!) to all those who were jabbed but now want their innate immune system to revert to ‘virgin’ statusNow is the time to do it! Why and how?

Omicron will soon dominate the scene. As it is poorly (or not at all) recognized by S(pike)-directed antibodies (Abs) that are either induced by the current C-19 vaccines (containing Wuhan’s S protein) or by short-lived anti-S Abs of low affinity that result from previous asymptomatic/ mild infection with the Delta variant, your valuable innate Abs capable of handling ALL SARS-CoV-2 variants will now be set free! 

–  Under NO circumstances should you get further shots, and certainly not with an updated (anti-Omicron) C-19 vaccine (see footnote

–  Take your health VERY SERIOUSLY (exercise, focus on metabolic health & a nutritious diet, don’t panic and work to minimize stress & anxiety)

…In addition, the more people refrain from getting jabbed with an updated anti-Omicron vaccine, the more readily we (Wuhan S-vaccinated and unvaccinated together!) will diminish the infectious pressure in the population and, therefore, mitigate disease symptoms and achieve herd immunity (thanks to sterilizing immunity conferred by a fully functional innate immune system). This will largely prevent healthy individuals from contracting the disease and even protect the most vulnerable who lack full-fledged innate immunity because of underlying conditions.

link

AUSTRALIA: Expert panel on immunization says it NEVER recommended covid VAX mandates

Australia’s expert immunisation panel has distanced itself from state-enforced Covid-19 vaccine mandates and says it never recommended them.

The Australian Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation (ATAGI) insists no recommendation was made at any time to the states regarding mandatory vaccine rules, which have sparked widespread protests across the country.

The advisory body was grilled at a parliamentary committee hearing on Wednesday, where it was asked the controversial mandates are still necessary if 90 per cent of the population are double jabbed.

link

Unethical Employment of Intellectual Property

The link to TES’s reply to the question at the top is here: Unethical Employment of Intellectual Property.

This essay is a must read. I hope smart biologists and lawyers will jump on this and use these ideas to alleviate our current dangerous situation with what is clearly vax induced disease as well as injury. Below is a short excerpt. Please do not let this replace reading the whole essay which is not long, very clearly written, and not hard to understand.

What we have served to broach here is the critical role of product identity, in the conflation of ethical burdens on the part of companies inside the separate contexts of naturally occurring and synthesized threats. The ethical standards under each circumstance are different. The exercise of enforced medicinals under threat of a naturally occurring pathogen can be ethical. However, once the threat is principally created by a modified/artificial/fabricated agent, then enforcement of that synthesized/derived agent itself, as the solution to a problem which it created in the first place, especially under the auspices of monopoly profit, constitutes 18 U.S.C. § 1961 – U.S. Code Racketeering.

Unethical Employment of Intellectual Property

Can someone get this to Robert Malone and the Unity Project people? ABN