Do your best. Speak the truth.
In light of recent events in Kansas City, does the media truly selectively focus on white criminals over POC ones?
Yes, seemingly so. A murderer’s race is mentioned 4x more often if he is white rather than black.
And not only does the media mention the race of white murderers more, they also do it sooner into the article!
I’ve noticed this myself, they place the race of white offenders more prominently
A retired CIA leader coordinated a letter from former intelligence chiefs claiming that Hunter Biden‘s laptop was Russian disinformation because he wanted to help Joe Biden‘s presidential campaign.
Mike Morell told the House Judiciary Committee that he was asked by Antony Blinken, the Secretary of State – who at the time was a senior member of the Biden campaign – to help discredit the laptop reporting.
link
No news is good news if Blinken, Garland, or Mayorkas is involved. Most anti-American admin in history, almost like a covert force. ABN
I write the headline in the form of a question but in reality, all of the data points in one direction, yes.
If I am going to be brutally honest, this Elon Musk scenario is like the August 2022 review when it became obvious all of the DeSantis 2024 data only reconciled in one direction. In many ways, Musk is to social media interests as DeSantis is to DC UniParty interests.
More than half the readers here have picked up on the clues and cues showing Musk has a very real motive to position himself in the best light possible given the situation that surrounds him. Unfortunately, that position creates conflicts between ideals (what’s possible) and reality (what limits surround one’s ability). Musk is riding a tiger, and the intelligence community ring masters control the beast.
The damage control motive is a few layers deep. However, one of the recent events that would lead to Musk’s public need for brand image protection comes from the situation with Matt Taibbi:
link
In this essay, Musk is compared to Bill Barr winning approval for siding with Trump only to later use that as cover to destroy him. In today’s analogy, ‘Trump’ is the gullible Twitter public who are being fooled by a powerful psyop that ultimately will own them. I am not 100% convinced of Musk’s role in this though the argument makes sense. It is seriously telling that the ‘Fauci Files’ have never been released, nor has much else come out. Musk has made Twitter better, but Barr made things look better too. Why does Sundance trust Taibbi? Nothing is perfect. Time maybe will tell. ABN
Obviously I agree with him, but the widely shared video cuts off before @JohnRatcliffe starts blaming the CCP.
Here’s the full statement.
2) What if the Chinese MIL were responding to a biological attack?
Ratcliffe asserts that they “destroyed tests, samples and data”.
If we found a rogue lab creating bioweapons in the US, wouldn’t you expect our military to destroy the pathogens and confiscate/destroy the data?
3) Ratcliffe also asserts that China had the audacity to produce “propaganda” that the US created Covid-19.
I wonder what gave them that idea. Maybe it was the fact that the US have the largest global biolab network and have been doing gain of function research for decades…
4) It was the US government and their controlled media, who published and distributed more propaganda about Covid, than the rest of the world combined.
[I tend to like Ratcliffe due to his demeanor and clear deliveries of information, so I have a conscious bias. That said, he needs to directly and fully address the many indications that US actors not only created covid-19 in a lab but also released it into the world, with a special release in Wuhan that makes it look like China did it. ABN]
Continue reading “Covid lab leak argument is strong, but which lab and was it a leak?”michaelshellenberger@proton.me.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) hired a marketing firm to write what looked like news articles but were actually ad placements created to persuade parents of young children and elderly people to get flu shots, according to documents obtained by Children’s Health Defense (CHD).
The documents, obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request, show the CDC in September 2020 hired Weber Shandwick, a marketing firm, to create and place unattributed articles on news sites.
The campaign was part of a multi-year, $32 million dollar contract between Weber Shandwick and the CDC’s National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases (NCIRD) to promote influenza vaccination and strengthen NCIRD’s immunization program.
link
Full video:
It would be very good if most Americans understood this. This interview is excellent. Both men provide lots of information and excellent analyses to augment it. ABN
Excellent interview, full of information and intelligent analysis. Very direct and to the point throughout. This is a model for how an interview can be conducted and how an interviewee can respond. As many of us have known all along, this war has been a psychopathic massacre of Ukrainian men and a disaster for Western geopolitics. ABN
This was a total lie and they knew it and did it because they are a propaganda organ of the Deep State. NPR sells Deep State propaganda using childish voices to make their lies appear innocent. ABN
One way to look at elites is they have evolved in tandem with the inexhaustible gullibility of the masses. This has taught them that they can get away with anything. And this has made them careless and, yes, incompetent. They really did think it was a good idea to goad Russia into war and then respond with sanctions. Or that they really can get away with a plandemic and weaponized vax. Our elites are a product and reflection of the gullibility of human masses, of us. Historically, it has ever been thus.
Kevin McKernan has a good take on what covid really was and is—he sees it as PCR test malfeasance built on a weak virus that can’t do much more than infect with mild or no symptoms. Mike Yeadon sees it this way as well.
Why were there such bad symptoms in some people or such large death tolls? Because patients were maltreated in hospitals, which were paid handsomely to do deadly protocols. Maybe some strong viruses were seeded here and there which would account for the bad symptoms experienced by some. A sprinkling of cases like that would suffice to alarm doctors whose concerns would intensify the scam. This is biowarfare being used to cause panic and disruption more than to kill in very large numbers.
Recall the scary lab leak from China and their videos, and their being secretive about the origins of covid; all just mind-control to panic the masses. A thread on this topic and McKernan’s thoughts can be found here. This way of looking at it accounts for what JJ Couey is saying while also sidelining many of his conclusions. ABN
By now people are familiar with a New York Times (original source) story of a leak of sensitive classified information regarding U.S. operations in Ukraine and other geopolitical efforts. The New York Times was the first with the story, as shared with them by “senior Biden administration officials.”
…If you follow the bouncing ball, what you immediately suspect is the domestic IC planted the ‘classified information’ in the platforms they can access, then turn around and report on the leak of the classified information to media they use for domestic narrative engineering.
♦ Motive – But why would the IC plant classified information, then turn around and report on the classified information they planted? This is where you need to learn how the motives work, against a bigger picture.
The leak (planted information) and then the telling of the leak (NYT story) creates an opportunity for the domestic IC to frame a Russian dis/mis/mal-information narrative.
But why would the IC want to immediately stir up a misinformation or disinformation narrative against Russia?
♦ Answer: 18 hours before the leak/story construct. Two Russian gremlins, perhaps state sponsored, or perhaps just state aligned, tricked former French President Francios Hollande into admitting the U.S. government and western alliance were behind all of the events in Ukraine after 2014, with the expressed intention to construct a proxy war against Russia using Ukraine.
Russian Pranksters Vovan and Lexus, posing as former Ukraine President Petro Poroshenko, got French ex-President Francois Hollande to admit the Minsk Accords were a NATO ruse to militarize Ukraine, and Western nations overthrew Ukraine’s democratically-elected government in 2014. (Full YouTube Conversation)
link
Very important to understand this connection, which details how US propaganda/ mind-control works through MSM. I have excerpted a part of the article and hope readers will take the time to read the whole piece linked above. ABN
A thread of videos that young people are watching and sharing by the millions:
Young people on Tiktok are not fucking around. These videos get literally millions of views. Political awakening is happening at a speed I’ve never seen before.
CW: police brutality, anti-Black violence & death
[This is an important thread, especially if you are unaware of vids like these. US wants to ban TikTok because the app allows China to promote this sort of material. In principle I despise censorship, but when an entire app is controlled by a communist anti-American foreign entity, is it censorship to ban it or right policy to prevent an adversary having this kind of influence over young people? I do favor the ban but am also aware that this brings other less clearcut bans into question. We are in an era of 5GW information warfare. There clearly is nowhere to hide from it. Everyone wants to be in control. AI will probably intensify this even more though it may also make it clearer how information is used, by whom, and why. Be sure to watch at least four or five of the vids below. ABN]
UPDATE: My support of a ban or restrictions on TikTok do not mean I support the RESTRICT ACT. I do not support that act. ABN
Continue reading “This is the real reason why the US wants to ban TikTok”
I love Twitter for doing this. NPR is mind-control propaganda that deceptively implants hypnotic mental weakness and dangerous ideas into listeners by using cuddly voices that sound like children reading children’s stories to children. ABN
UPDATE: Elon Musk elaborates:
How a former CIA fellow came to lead US government efforts to stamp out disfavored speech on the Internet
Since the 2016 elections, politicians, journalists, and many others have raised the alarm about “foreign election influence” and “disinformation,” demanding greater “content moderation” by social media platforms. It is too easy, they argued, for foreign and malign actors to quickly “go viral” at low cost, leaving the good guys unable to correct bad information. We must become more “resilient” to disinformation.
It’s now clear that all of that rhetoric was cover for a sweeping censorship effort by the federal government and government contractors.
Since December, a small but growing group of journalists, analysts, and researchers have documented the rise of a “Censorship Industrial Complex”, a network of U.S. government agencies, and government-funded think tanks. Over the last six years, these entities have coordinated their efforts to both spread disinformation and to censor journalists, politicians, and ordinary Americans. They have done so directly and indirectly, including by playing good cop/bad cop with Twitter and Facebook. Hundreds and perhaps thousands of people have been involved in these censorship and disinformation campaigns in the U.S., Canada, and the UK.
We now know, thanks to the Twitter Files, emails released by the Attorney Generals of Missouri and Louisiana, and research by others, that the Censorship Industrial Complex is violating the First Amendment by coordinating with government agencies and receiving government funding to pressure and help social media companies to both censor information, including accurate information, while spreading disinformation, including conspiracy theories.
And such efforts are continuing if not accelerating. At Biden’s “Summit for Democracy” last week, US allies in Europe demanded that Facebook censor “false narratives” and news that would “weaken our support to Ukraine.” Facebook agreed.
link
American Buddhist Net 