Are vaccines CAUSING the recent spikes in deaths? Strong evidence cannot be ignored

Mike Whitney proposes the following hypothesis, which is well-worth considering:

The sharp rise in cases and deaths following mass vaccination is NOT related to Covid “the respiratory illness”, but Covid “the vascular disease”. The vascular component is mainly the result of spike proteins produced by cells in the lining of the blood vessels (Endothilium) that are activating platelets that cause blood clots and bleeding. The other main factor is autoimmune reaction in which the killer lymphocytes attack one’s own body triggering widespread inflammation (and potential organ failure.). In short, the post-injection fatalities are caused by the spike proteins produced by the vaccines and not by Covid. Once again, look at the chart of Cambodia. There were no deaths prior to vaccination. All the deaths came afterwards. That suggests that the fatalities are attributable to the vaccines. (Mass Vaccination triggers sharp spike in Cases and Deaths)

One piece of evidence he provides is this:

“What is very clear looking at data worldwide, is that vaccinations are certainly not associated with a reliable fall in covid cases in any predictable timeframe. This, alongside the observations in the trial, surely must be addressed. What is happening here? Is it just that vaccinations are coincidentally being rolled out at the same time as outbreaks are due? In very many places? Or is the vaccine not working immediately? If not, why not? … Or is the vaccine making people more susceptible to infection? If this is the case … is this a temporary effect? What causes it? … How long does it take for any increased susceptibility to diminish?”…We are told that everyone must be vaccinated (but) How can free informed consent be given under these conditions?” (“Covid-rates Post Vaccination around the World”, Inform Scotland)

Another piece is this:

there is also a very real possibility, supported by animal experiments as well as by the studies cited above, that the vaccine itself may produce symptoms in vulnerable people which are then attributed to Covid-19. The damage to health may be especially severe in an individual who has been recently or is concurrently infected with the actual virus.

There is therefore every reason to doubt the manufacturers’ assurances that the deaths and injuries seen to be accompanying vaccination, and that in some instances look like and are being attributed to Covid-19, are unrelated to the jabs. The situation is serious enough for some doctors and scientists to be calling for a moratorium on further Covid vaccinations until it has been properly investigated.” (“Every reason to doubt the vaccine makers’ reassurances“, Conservative Woman)

A third piece of evidence provided by Whitney is this:

The team then replicated this process in the lab, exposing healthy endothelial cells (which line arteries) to the spike protein. They showed that the spike protein damaged the cells by binding ACE2. This binding disrupted ACE2’s molecular signaling to mitochondria (organelles that generate energy for cells), causing the mitochondria to become damaged and fragmented.

Previous studies have shown a similar effect when cells were exposed to the SARS-CoV-2 virus, but this is the first study to show that the damage occurs when cells are exposed to the spike protein on its own.” (“The novel coronavirus’ spike protein plays additional key role in illness, Salk.edu)

I can add that Geert Vanden Bossche has advanced a similar hypothesis while also noting that vaccines may drive the evolution of more contagious variants, which we are also seeing.

Similarly, Dr Sucharit Bhakdi has argued that the vaccines risk harming epithelial cells. Other doctors and medical professionals who have argued along the lines of Whitney’s hypothesis can be found by scrolling through our health tag.

A very disturbing aspect of all of the above is MSM and the CDC are completely ignoring all of it.

Whitney also includes the following video, which ABN posted yesterday. I am including a Bitchute version of that video below in case the YouTube link is disappeared.

The impact of vaccines on mortality:

UFOs: Interview with Luis Elizondo on upcoming govt release of information

INVERSE: Why has this topic come to a head in the last few years? Does it come from within the intelligence community or from forces outside?

ELIZONDO: There has been an increase in support for transparency around the UAP [unidentified aerial phenomena] subject from both inside and outside government. We’re now living in a world where most in government who’ve been briefed on the full UAP portfolio immediately realize the seriousness of this subject.

“THE REALITY OF UFOS IS NO LONGER A STIGMATIZED ISSUE. IT’S FACT.”

Covid mRNA vaccine “induces complex functional reprogramming of innate immune responses”

No small matter. Just below is the study. Below that is an article about the study.

The mRNA-based BNT162b2 vaccine from Pfizer/BioNTech was the first registered COVID-19 vaccine and has been shown to be up to 95% effective in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infections. Little is known about the broad effects of the new class of mRNA vaccines, especially whether they have combined effects on innate and adaptive immune responses. Here we confirmed that BNT162b2 vaccination of healthy individuals induced effective humoral and cellular immunity against several SARS-CoV-2 variants. Interestingly, however, the BNT162b2 vaccine also modulated the production of inflammatory cytokines by innate immune cells upon stimulation with both specific (SARS-CoV-2) and non-specific (viral, fungal and bacterial) stimuli. The response of innate immune cells to TLR4 and TLR7/8 ligands was lower after BNT162b2 vaccination, while fungi-induced cytokine responses were stronger. In conclusion, the mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine induces complex functional reprogramming of innate immune responses, which should be considered in the development and use of this new class of vaccines.

The BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 reprograms both adaptive and innate immune responses

I was very surprised to find this article referring to the study above on the front page of Google’s general news feed: Research suggests Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine reprograms innate immune responses.

Researchers in The Netherlands and Germany have warned that Pfizer-BioNTech’s coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine induces complex reprogramming of innate immune responses that should be considered in the development and use of mRNA-based vaccines.

Research suggests Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine reprograms innate immune responses

This kind of information is normally kept from the eyes of the general public. I wonder if it slipped through because the language is somewhat complex and studiously neutral. Of course, reprogramming our innate immune system is the biggest fear we have about these vaccines because once reprogrammed, the innate immune response will stay that way for decades, even a whole life. Changing something as complex as our natural immune system which is the fruit of millions of years of evolution is dangerous. Period. No doubt about that. Will these changes be passed on to offspring? Will they be contagious as the artificial spike proteins induced by the vaccines appear to be? What does an unplanned change in our immune response to fungi bode for the future? Clearly, these are not questions to be answered by vaccinating as much of the world as you can.

Rational overview of covid and covid policies

Twelve key questions about COVID-19 and lockdowns answered. All answers fully referenced from peer-reviewed research and leading authorities.

COVID-19: Just the Facts

The linked article provides a very good summary of the main covid issues. It centers on UK policies, statistics, and concerns but its conclusions largely apply to USA and world as well.

I found the section on vaccines wanting due to relying too much on dubious government statistics. In USA, it is of great concern that the CDC appears to have deliberately manipulated covid infection and mortality rates to make the disease seem worse and the vaccines better than they are. Also of great concern in USA is the banning and shunning of effective treatments such as ivermectin and budesonide, among others. Even worse it appears these treatments have been deliberately pushed aside so that Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) could be issued for the “experimental vaccines.” That would constitute a crime against humanity if true. I am not sure how much US policy affects UK, but it is probably considerable. Underlying policies for most nations appear to have some “global” source, either the WHO, elite herd mentality, or something more sinister.

“Ivermectin can end this pandemic”: large, statistically significant reductions in mortality, time to clinical recovery, and time to viral clearance found for Ivermectin

Meta-analyses based on 18 randomized controlled treatment trials of ivermectin in COVID-19 have found large, statistically significant reductions in mortality, time to clinical recovery, and time to viral clearance. Furthermore, results from numerous controlled prophylaxis trials report significantly reduced risks of contracting COVID-19 with the regular use of ivermectin. Finally, the many examples of ivermectin distribution campaigns leading to rapid population-wide decreases in morbidity and mortality indicate that an oral agent effective in all phases of COVID-19 has been identified.

Review of the Emerging Evidence Demonstrating the Efficacy of Ivermectin in the Prophylaxis and Treatment of COVID-19

Article about the study:

“We did the work that the medical authorities failed to do, we conducted the most comprehensive review of the available data on ivermectin,” said Pierre Kory, MD, president and chief medical officer of the FLCCC. “We applied the gold standard to qualify the data reviewed before concluding that ivermectin can end this pandemic.”

A focus of the manuscript was on the 27 controlled trials available in January 2021, 15 of which were randomised controlled trials (RCT’s).

Consistent with numerous meta-analyses of ivermectin RCT’s since published by expert panels from the UK, Italy, Spain and Japan, they found a large, statistically significant reduction in mortality, time to recovery, and viral clearance in COVID-19 patients treated with ivermectin.

“Our latest research shows, once again, that when the totality of the evidence is examined, there is no doubt that ivermectin is highly effective as a safe prophylaxis and treatment for COVID-19,” said Paul E. Marik, founding member of the FLCCC and Chief, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine at Eastern Virginia Medical School.

Immediate Use of Ivermectin Medicine Globally Can End COVID-19 Pandemic: Scientists

Further reading: A plan to eradicate SARS-CoV-2 in Belgium in six weeks using ivermectin

Former Director of Pentagon “UFO program” on why UFO information is being made public now

Part Two: “Pay attention for the next thirty days. I think this… is about to get real interesting… This is a process not an event.”

What are the odds that an alien race visiting us would be using technology only 100 years ahead of ours? Why not thousands, millions, or billions of years ahead of ours? One hundred years is next to nothing on cosmic time scales. So if Elizondo is right about this claim, then: 1) the technology could be terrestrial, coming from Russia, China, or Western Europe; 2) a much more advanced alien civilization is allowing us to see only this technology and not more; and 3) the alien civilization is technologically only a few centuries ahead of us.

The third option is the least likely while the second is the most likely—an alien civilization is allowing us to see only technology we can (almost) understand. In my view, any highly advanced civilization visiting earth would almost certainly not want o harm us. They would show their hand gradually to prevent panic and confusion. Based on this reasoning, the second option again seems most likely. Since UFOs have been reliably observed since before the 1950s, it seems very unlikely the technology is a human invention.

Geert Vanden Bossche makes the important point that covid variants could very well be arising due to vaccines being given during the pandemic

This makes sense both evolutionarily and in what we are seeing on the ground. I posted this whole interview some days ago but am reposting this segment because events in India seem to be further confirming what Bossche is saying.

On a more sinister note, it might be added that if covid was released as a bioweapon, then whoever released it would probably release the kinds of variants we are seeing. This problem is so complex and serious, in an odd way it is also fascinating. If Bossche is right then we are living through the most deadly health policy in world history. At the same time, we can be all but certain that covid is a laboratory gain of function creation; made as an experiment or as a weapon, with scores of inferences arising from either assumption.

The following video provides a more detailed explanation of Vanden Bossche’s main points: Summary, key lessons and conclusions. Well-worth viewing.

Ivermectin: in NY you have to go to court to have your prescription filled

This video also describes what you need to do to legally prepare yourself for this eventuality.

Good, clear explanation by a doctor of why Ivermectin works so well: Dr Pierre Kory, Part 2, Ivermectin

The worst explanation for government interfering in patient-doctor relations is Emergency Use Authorization for all vaccines requires that no other treatment be available. There is some subtlety in this as legally the covid vacs are considered treatments not vaccines. Whatever, the second worst explanation for this mess is people are stupid herd animals easily manipulated by a few top authorities, who may also be stupid or greedy or even worse. And there is plenty of evidence for all three of those.

Are covid vaccines causing massive excess deaths in UK?

When something in data is this unusual, we have to ask questions, no matter how uncomfortable they may be. It is an undeniable fact that this peak in deaths coincided with the mass roll-out of novel mRNA/DNA vaccines, on an extremely vulnerable population. If you compare the week ending 11 December 2020 with the week ending 29 January 2021, there was a 62% increase in total deaths and a 170% increase in COVID-19 labelled deaths in care homes.

Mortality data & COVID-19
image from Mortality data & COVID-19

Are we seeing similar figures in USA?

COVID-19: an overview of the evidence

This is a very reasonable and balanced report on covid from the HART group in the UK. This is the kind of perspective the whole world needs to adopt. Linked to this overview is a more detailed report where readers can delve further into issues that most concern them. ABN

Reinstate the existing pandemic planning policies from 2019, pending a detailed review of the policies adopted in 2020. Look to countries and states which did things differently. There should be a clear commitment from the Government that we will never again lockdown.

Stop mass testing healthy people. Return to the principles of respiratory disease diagnosis (the requirement of symptoms) that were well researched and accepted before 2020. Manufacturers’ guidelines state that these tests are designed to assist the diagnosis of symptomatic patients, not to ‘find’ disease in otherwise healthy people.

Stop all mask mandates. They are psychologically and potentially physically harmful whilst being clinically unproven to stop disease spread in the community and may themselves be a transmission risk.

Vaccination. Abandon the notion that vaccine certification is desirable and that children should be vaccinated. There is no logical or ethical argument for either.

Devise a public education programme to help redress the severe distortions in beliefs around disease transmission, likelihood of dying and possible treatment options. A messaging style based on a calm presentation of facts is urgently needed.

A full public enquiry into the extent to which severe/fatal COVID-19 is spread in hospitals and care homes. There is stark recent evidence on this from Public Health Scotland and if true for the rest of the UK, there needs to be better segregation of COVID-19 patients and staff within these settings.

More funding and investigation of treatments for COVID-19, instead of only focusing on vaccination as a strategy. Given the high rates of hospital transmission, encourage a drive for more early treatment-at-home using some of the protocols discussed herein.

Divert funds. The not inconsiderable money saved from ceasing testing programmes can be diverted to much needed areas, such as mental health, treatment research and an increase in hospital capacity and staffing. The vast debts accrued during 2020 will also need to be paid off, a fact that seems to be worryingly absent from economic recovery plans.

COVID-19: an overview of the evidence

HART: Answers to basic covid questions

From their website: “HART is a group of highly qualified UK doctors, scientists, economists, psychologists and other academic experts.”

Included in this week’s bulletin:

Should children be vaccinated against COVID-19? The risk vs benefit calculation gives a resounding: no
Still no end in sight Huge ad campaign to run into 2022
Unqualified celebrities promote vaccination New NHS film misinforms and misrepresents
Ivermectin is effective More endorsement for the anti-parasitic drug
New variant not responsible for winter wave The true cause needs investigating
Natural vs vaccine immunity Which is safer or more protective?
An update from the USA Even more citizens are living free

6 May 2021 – bulletin

Highly efficient immune response in asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 patients

Researchers in Singapore have investigated the role of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies and T-cells in asymptomatic individuals suffering from COVID-19. They found that, contrary to some initial hypotheses, asymptomatic individuals mount an adaptive immune response on par with symptomatic individuals, demonstrating that T cell response does not appear to be correlated with symptom severity.

Highly efficient immune response in asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 patients